SR5: SR5 Senate Special Committee on Investigations; reauthorizing
2025-2026 Regular Session · Enrolled version · Last action January 13, 2025
25 LC 47 3186
Senate Resolution 5
By: Senators Dolezal of the 27th, Kennedy of the 18th, Gooch of the 51st, Beach of the 21st,
Still of the 48th and others
ADOPTED SENATE
A RESOLUTION
Reauthorizing the Senate Special Committee on Investigations; to provide for the issuance1
of compulsory process to secure the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents2
and materials; and for other purposes.3
WHEREAS, in early 2024 it came to the attention of the Senate, through public reports and4
court filings, that Fani Willis, district attorney for the Atla nta Judicial Circuit, which5
comprises Fulton County, was accused of various forms of miscon duct relating to the6
prosecution of cases related to the 2020 Presidential Election; and7
WHEREAS, such alleged misconduct included the expenditure of significant public funds8
for the purpose of hiring a special assistant district attorney , with whom District Attorney9
Willis had an ongoing romantic relationship; and10
WHEREAS, such relationship was eventually admitted in open court; and11
WHEREAS, the Superior Court of the Atlanta Judicial Circuit, which is presiding over the12
trial where such allegations have become an issue concluded, among other things, that the13
practices of District Attorney Fani Willis in the case of State v. Trump created "a significant14
appearance of impropriety that infects the current structure of the prosecution team … [and15
S. R. 5
- 1 -
25 LC 47 3186
that] a perceived conflict in the reasonable eyes of the public threatens confidence in the16
legal system itself. When this danger goes uncorrected, it und ermines the legitimacy and17
moral focus of our already weakest branch of government," State v. Trump , 2024 WL18
1236900, at * 1, 5 (Ga. Super. Mar. 15, 2024); and19
WHEREAS, after examining the "facts and circumstances" at issue, the Court of Appeals of20
Georgia agreed that the practices created an appearance of impropriety and that the matter21
presented "the rare case in which disqualification [of District Attorney Fani Willis] is22
mandated and [that] no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity23
of [the] proceedings," Roman v. State, A24A1595, 2024 WL 516724 at *7 (Ga. App. Dec.24
19, 2024); and25
WHEREAS, many have concluded that the conduct of District Attorney Willis has brought26
her and her office into disrepute; undermined public confidence in the fair, impartial, and27
disinterested administration of justice by prosecutors across o ur state; and cast significant28
doubt as to the purpose and validity of the charges her office has brought in regard to29
the 2020 Presidential Election; and30
WHEREAS, the General Assembly is empowered by the Constitution of the State of Georgia31
to pass legislation to regulate certain prosecutorial practices, including those at issue in the32
Roman v. State matter, see Ga. Const. Art. VI, Sec. VIII, Paras. I and II; and33
WHEREAS, the taxpayers of Fulton County have already borne a significant financial cost34
in supporting activities relating to this prosecution, including the hiring of investigators and35
attorneys, the conduct of grand jury proceedings, negotiation of plea agreements with various36
co-defendants in the case, and other activities relating to the sprawling investigation of37
the 2020 Presidential Election; and38
S. R. 5
- 2 -
25 LC 47 3186
WHEREAS, inquiry into these circumstances may show that existing state laws, including39
those establishing processes for selecting, hiring, and compensating special assistant district40
attorneys, are inadequate to address various legal and fiscal issues raised by District Attorney41
Willis's alleged conduct; and42
WHEREAS, the General Assembly, of which the Senate is a part, has "the power to make43
all laws not inconsistent with this Constitution, and not repugnant to the Constitution of the44
United States, which it shall deem necessary and proper for the welfare of the state"; see Ga.45
Const. Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. I; and46
WHEREAS, Article III, Section IX, Paragraph II(b) of the Georgia Constitution provides that47
"[t]he General Assembly shall annually appropriate those state and federal funds necessary48
to operate all the various departments and agencies" of state g overnment, including the49
Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of the State of Georgia and the Prosecuting Attorneys50
Qualifications Commission; and51
WHEREAS, the Georgia Supreme Court, in Dean v. Bolton , 235 Ga. 544, held that52
constitutional separation of powers does not prohibit the legislative branch from investigating53
the official conduct of any person performing duties in any branch of the government; and54
WHEREAS, the Senate has the inherent power and authority to conduct investigations into55
any matter relevant to the administration of existing laws, pro posals for new or amended56
laws, the expenditure of public funds, the conduct of public officers who discharge powers57
and duties under state law, and any other matter germane to its role as part of the legislative58
branch of state government; and59
S. R. 5
- 3 -
25 LC 47 3186
WHEREAS, the Superior Court of the Atlanta Judicial Circuit considered the question of the60
Senate's authority to act in this manner and the manner authorized by Senate Resolution 465,61
which the Senate adopted during that 157th General Assembly, se e Willis v. The Georgia62
Senate Special Committee on Investigations, et al. , Civil Action No. 24CV011204 (Ga.63
Super. Dec. 23, 2024); and64
WHEREAS, over the objections of District Attorney Willis, the S uperior Court in Willis65
agreed and acknowledged that precedent maintains that the "inhe rent powers of our State66
General Assembly are awesome … The legislature is absolutely unrestricted in its power to67
legislate, so long as it does not undertake to enact measures prohibited by the State or Federal68
Constitution," Willis at 2 (citing Ga. Power Co. v. Allied Chem. Corp. , 233 Ga. 558, 56569
(citing Sears v. State of Georgia, 232 Ga. 547, 553-54)); and 70
WHEREAS, the Willis court further recognized that the "State Constitution authorizes each71
chamber to adopt its own rules and create committees … Here, th e Senate, as a chamber,72
empowered itself to issue subpoenas, which it was authorized to do," Willis at 3 (citing Ga.73
Const. Art. III, Sec. IV, Par. IV; Coggin v. Davey, 233 Ga. 407, 411); and74
75
WHEREAS, such inherent powers also include the authority to create special committees for76
the purpose of conducting investigations and to endow such committees with all the inherent77
powers of investigation possessed by the Senate, including the power to compel the78
appearance and testimony of witnesses and the production of records and the power to place79
witnesses under oath or affirmation; and80
WHEREAS, in addition to such inherent powers, Code Sections 45- 15-17 and 45-15-1981
empower the General Assembly to make investigations into the affairs of the state and further82
authorize compelling the appearance and testimony of witnesses and the production of83
S. R. 5
- 4 -
25 LC 47 3186
records and grants, the power to place witnesses under oath or affirmation, and to enforce84
subpoenas issued pursuant thereto; and85
WHEREAS, Article III, Section IV, Paragraph IV of the Georgia Constitution provides for86
the creation of interim committees pursuant to the authority of the General Assembly or of87
either house; and88
WHEREAS, in 2024, with the adop tion of Senate Resolution 465, i t was the sense of the89
Senate that such issues arising from or relating to the conduct of District Attorney Willis90
were best examined by a select group of Senators who, acting as a special committee, were91
empowered by the Senate to exercise each of the Senate's inherent powers of investigation;92
and93
WHEREAS, the special committee established pursuant to Senate Resolution 465 diligently94
conducted its investigation, holding multiple meetings where su ch committee was able to95
take testimony from a number of witnesses, and received a numbe r of books, records, and96
papers from such witnesses, but was not able to complete the investigation prior to the end97
of the 157th General Assembly; and98
WHEREAS, in the exercise of the aforesaid powers, it remains ne cessary to determine99
whether the conduct of District Attorney Willis should be addressed by the enactment of new100
or amended laws of statewide application, prompt some change in state appropriations, or101
both; and102
WHEREAS, it remains the sense of the Senate that such issues arising from or relating to the103
alleged and admitted misconduct of District Attorney Willis are best examined by a select104
S. R. 5
- 5 -
25 LC 47 3186
group of Senators who, acting as a special committee, shall be empowered to exercise each105
of the Senate's inherent and statutory powers of investigation.106
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE:107
(1) Delegation of Authority and Recreation and Reauthorization of t he Senate108
special committee. The Senate hereby delegates its powers to the Senate Special109
Committee on Investigations, which is recreated and reauthorized.110
(2) Members and officers. The committee shall be composed of no more than nine111
members, at least three of whom shall be from the minority party. All members shall be112
appointed by the Senate Committee on Assignments, which shall also select a chairperson113
of the committee from its membership.114
(3) Powers and duties. The committee is hereby reauthorized to undertake a legislative115
investigation into the issues mentioned above or related theret o. For the purpose of116
conducting any investigation as provided herein, the committee shall have the power to117
administer oaths; to call any party to testify under oath at such investigations; to require118
the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, records, and papers; and to take119
the depositions of witnesses. For such purposes, the committee is reauthorized to issue120
subpoenas for any witness or to compel the production of any books, records, or papers121
and is further reauthorized to undertake such actions as may be necessary to enforce such122
subpoenas in cases of refusal to obey. The committee is hereby declared to be the123
successor to the committee established pursuant to Senate Resolution 465 and shall have124
access to and control over any books, records, or papers obtain ed by such earlier125
committee. Pursuant to Senate Rule 2-1.5(d), the committee may establish rules of126
operation that are not in conflict with Senate Rules or the most current edition of Mason's127
Manual of Legislative Procedure; provided, however, the committee may not establish128
rules that authorize one member to issue subpoenas without the consent of the committee129
S. R. 5
- 6 -
25 LC 47 3186
as demonstrated by a majority vote at a meeting where a quorum is present or without the130
express, written consent of the chairperson of the committee.131
(4) Meetings. The chairperson shall call all meetings of the committee. The committee132
may conduct such meetings at such places and at such times as it may deem necessary or133
convenient, including at any time during the interim period occ urring following the134
Senate adjourning sine die , to enable it to exercise fully and effectively its powers,135
perform its duties, and accomplish the objectives and purposes of this resolution.136
(5) Funding. Funds necessary to carry out the provisions of this resolution shall come137
from funds appropriated to the Senate.138
(6) Report.139
(A) In the event the committee adopts any specific findings or recommendations that140
include suggestions for proposed legislation or changes in appr opriations, the141
chairperson shall file a report of the same, subject to subpara graph (C) of this142
paragraph.143
(B) In the event the committee adopts a report that does not i nclude suggestions for144
proposed legislation or changes in appropriations, the chairperson shall file the report,145
subject to subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.146
(C) No report shall be filed unless the same has been approved by majority vote of a147
quorum of the committee. A report so approved shall be signed by the chairperson of148
the committee and filed with the Secretary of the Senate.149
(D) In the absence of an approved report, the chairperson may file with the Secretary150
of the Senate a copy of the minutes of the meetings of the committee in lieu thereof.151
S. R. 5
- 7 -