SB8: SB8 Courts; arrest warrant requirements when juvenile courts are acting as courts of inquiry; provide
Last action March 27, 2026 · House Passed/Adopted By Substitute
A House substitute for SB 8 would create a system of state-approved remote online notaries in Georgia, letting notaries verify signers over video instead of in person, while also toughening penalties for the unauthorized practice of law in real estate closings.
In plain language
This bill replaces its original subject (juvenile court arrest warrants) with an entirely different set of changes proposed in a House committee substitute. It sets up a new category of notary called a 'remote online notary public,' who can notarize documents by video call instead of meeting signers in person. The Georgia Superior Court Clerks' Cooperative Authority would write technical standards for this by January 1, 2027, and notaries would need extra training, a $2,000 bond, and secure video and record-keeping systems before they could notarize online. The bill also changes rules for real estate paperwork: clerks of superior court could accept documents with an official and unofficial witness without checking how the witnessing happened, and it becomes an unfair business practice under Georgia's consumer protection law (O.C.G.A. § 10-1-393) to knowingly file certain home real estate documents tied to the unauthorized practice of law. It raises some unauthorized-practice-of-law violations from misdemeanors to felonies with fines up to $1 million, effective July 1, 2026.
What the bill does
- Creates a new 'remote online notary public' commission letting notaries verify signers and notarize documents over secure video instead of meeting them face to face.
- Directs the Georgia Superior Court Clerks' Cooperative Authority to adopt technical standards for remote online notarization by January 1, 2027.
- Requires remote online notaries to complete training, pass an exam, post a $2,000 surety bond, and keep a ten-year electronic journal and video recording of each notarization.
- Makes it an unfair business practice to knowingly file certain one-to-four family home real estate documents tied to the unauthorized practice of law.
- Raises penalties for unauthorized practice of law violations under O.C.G.A. § 15-19-51 and § 15-19-53 from misdemeanors to felonies, with fines up to $1 million for repeat offenses.
- Exempts video recordings of remote online notarizations from Georgia's open records law (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70).
Who it affects
Notaries public and clerks of superior court statewide, people buying, selling, or refinancing homes, title and closing companies, technology vendors that provide video notarization services, and lawyers or non-lawyers involved in real estate closings who could face felony charges for unauthorized practice of law.
Why it matters
Georgians could get documents like deeds and closing papers notarized remotely instead of traveling to meet a notary in person, which could speed up real estate transactions. At the same time, people or companies improperly handling real estate closings without a licensed attorney could face felony charges and fines up to $1 million instead of a misdemeanor.
Key provisions
- Section 1-2 rewrites the notary definitions statute (O.C.G.A. § 45-17-1) to define terms like 'remote online notary public,' 'electronic seal,' and 'communication technology.'
- New Code Section 45-17-8.4 requires an applicant to already hold a regular notary commission, complete training, and submit an application with a technology provider and repository before becoming a remote online notary.
- New Code Section 45-17-8.5 requires each remote online notary to keep a tamper-evident electronic journal and audiovisual recording of each notarization, retained for at least ten years by a third-party repository.
- New Code Section 45-17-8.9 caps the fee a remote online notary can charge at $25.00 per notarization and makes tampering with a notary's digital signature tools a misdemeanor.
- New Code Section 45-17-8.10 clarifies that a non-attorney remote online notary is prohibited from giving legal advice or otherwise practicing law.
- Section 2-1 adds knowingly filing certain residential real estate documents tied to unauthorized law practice as an unfair or deceptive practice under the Fair Business Practices Act (O.C.G.A. § 10-1-393).
- Section 3-1 rewrites penalties under O.C.G.A. § 15-19-56, making certain unauthorized practice of law violations felonies punishable by one to ten years in prison and fines from $50,000 to $1 million.
- Section 4-1 sets most of the bill effective upon the Governor's signature, but delays the new felony penalties in Part III until July 1, 2026.
Status timeline
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Reconsidered (House)
- House Third Reading Lost (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
Show full history (17 actions)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Kay Kirkpatrick (R, SD-032)
- Brian Strickland (R, SD-042)
- Bo Hatchett (R, SD-050)
- Kim Jackson (D, SD-041)
- Matt Brass (R, SD-006)
- Jason Esteves (D, SD-035)
- Joseph Gullett (R, HD-019)
Votes
- Senate voteFebruary 10, 2025
51 yea, 1 nay (3 not voting, 1 absent)
- House voteMarch 31, 2025
79 yea, 87 nay (6 not voting, 8 absent)
- House voteMarch 31, 2025
94 yea, 74 nay (6 not voting, 6 absent)
- House voteMarch 27, 2026
115 yea, 45 nay (1 not voting, 15 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
26 yea, 26 nay (1 not voting, 1 absent)
Topics
- notary public
- remote online notarization
- real estate closings
- unauthorized practice of law
- consumer protection