HR32: HR32 General Assembly; increase maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property - CA
Last action May 14, 2025 · Effective Date 2025-05-14
A Georgia House resolution would ask voters to amend the state constitution to double the maximum acreage that qualifies for conservation-use property tax breaks, from 2,000 to 4,000 acres per owner.
In plain language
Georgia's constitution currently lets landowners get a special property tax assessment, called bona fide conservation use, on farmland and timber land up to 2,000 acres per owner. This resolution proposes raising that cap to 4,000 acres. The conservation use program lets qualifying land be taxed based on its current use and productivity rather than its full market value, as long as the owner signs a covenant to keep the land in that use. Because this is a constitutional change, it cannot take effect on its own. The resolution sends the question to Georgia voters as a ballot measure asking whether to raise the acreage limit to protect family farmland. If voters approve it, the higher 4,000-acre cap becomes part of the state constitution.
What the bill does
- Proposes a constitutional amendment raising the maximum acreage for bona fide conservation use property tax assessment from 2,000 to 4,000 acres per owner.
- Leaves unchanged the five-acre cap for bona fide residential transitional property and the existing rules requiring a covenant to keep the land in qualifying use.
- Keeps the existing penalty structure, requiring recapture of tax savings if an owner breaches the covenant within ten years.
- Sends the proposed amendment to Georgia voters as a ballot question for ratification or rejection.
Who it affects
Large landowners who farm or manage timber land, since more of their acreage could qualify for reduced property tax assessments; county tax assessors and local governments that collect property taxes; and Georgia voters, who will decide the measure at the ballot box.
Why it matters
If voters approve the amendment, owners of large farms and timber tracts could get reduced property tax assessments on up to 4,000 acres instead of 2,000, potentially lowering their tax bills while affecting the property tax base local governments rely on for revenue.
Key provisions
- Section 1 amends Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III(e)(1) of the Georgia Constitution to raise the conservation use acreage cap from 2,000 to 4,000 acres per single owner.
- Section 1 retains the requirement that a property owner sign a covenant to continue the land in bona fide conservation use or residential transitional use.
- Section 1 retains the rule that breaching the covenant within ten years results in recapture of tax savings and possible additional penalties.
- Section 2 sets the ballot language asking voters whether to raise the acreage limit from 2,000 to 4,000 acres to protect family farmland, and directs how the amendment is submitted for ratification.
From the bill
“Shall the Constitution of Georgia, for the purpose of protectin g family farmland, be amended so as to increase the maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property from 2,000 acres to 4,000 acres?”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2025-05-14
- Act 363
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Engrossed (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
Show full history (22 actions)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
- Robert Dickey (R, HD-134)
- Leesa Hagan (R, HD-156)
- Debbie Buckner (D, HD-137)
- Sam Watson (R, SD-011)
Votes
- House voteMarch 3, 2025
168 yea, 5 nay (1 not voting, 6 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 18, 2025
29 yea, 23 nay (1 not voting, 3 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 18, 2025
50 yea, 1 nay (1 not voting, 4 absent)
Topics
- property taxes
- conservation use
- farmland
- constitutional amendment
- ballot measure