HB180: HB180 Probate courts; modify certain requirements for probate judges
Last action May 14, 2025 · Effective Date 2025-07-01
House Bill 180 changes the eligibility rules for probate court judges in Georgia's larger counties, clarifying the requirement to have practiced law for seven years and protecting past rulings from being overturned on that basis.
In plain language
Georgia law already requires that in counties with more than 90,000 people (based on the 2010 census), a candidate for probate judge must be at least 30 years old, have practiced law for seven years, and be a member in good standing with the State Bar of Georgia. House Bill 180 rewrites this section of law (O.C.G.A. § 15-9-4) to restate these qualifications and keeps the requirement that candidates file a supplemental affidavit confirming they meet them. The bill also adds a new protection: any probate judge who held office on or after June 30, 2000 can keep serving and run for reelection, and no ruling or official action by a probate judge can be thrown out solely because that judge did not meet the seven-year law practice requirement. The bill repeals any conflicting laws and does not list a delayed effective date beyond the standard process.
What the bill does
- Restates that probate judges in counties with more than 90,000 people must be at least 30 years old, have practiced law for seven years, and be a State Bar member in good standing.
- Keeps the requirement that qualifying candidates file a supplemental affidavit affirming they meet these qualifications before or at the time they qualify to run.
- Adds a new rule protecting sitting probate judges who held office on or after June 30, 2000, letting them continue serving and run for reelection.
- Bars courts from overturning a probate judge's rulings or official actions solely because the judge lacked the seven-year law practice requirement.
- Repeals any other Georgia laws that conflict with these changes.
Who it affects
This bill affects probate court judges and candidates for probate judge in Georgia counties with populations over 90,000, county election qualifying officers who handle candidate affidavits, and anyone whose case has been decided by a probate judge whose legal qualifications might otherwise be challenged.
Why it matters
By shielding past and future probate court rulings from being overturned based solely on a judge's lack of seven years of law practice, the bill gives more legal certainty to decisions already made in larger counties' probate courts and to judges currently serving there.
Key provisions
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. § 15-9-4 to restate the age, law-practice, and State Bar membership qualifications for probate judges in counties over 90,000 people.
- Section 1 preserves the requirement for a supplemental affidavit confirming a candidate meets these qualifications, filed with the qualifying officer.
- Subsection (c) allows any probate judge holding office on or after June 30, 2000 to continue in office and seek reelection.
- Subsection (c) prohibits overturning any probate judge's decision, judgment, ruling, or official action based solely on the seven-year law practice qualification requirement.
- Section 2 repeals conflicting laws.
From the bill
“no decision, judgment, ruling,33 or other official action of any judge of the probate court shal l be overturned, denied, or34 overruled based solely on this requirement for qualification, election, and holding the office35 of judge of the probate court.”
“No individual elected judge of the probate court in any co unty provided for in this10 Code section shall engage in the private practice of law.”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2025-07-01
- Act 253
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
Show full history (15 actions)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Tyler Smith (R, HD-018)
- Mitchell Scoggins (R, HD-014)
- Trey Kelley (R, HD-016)
- Soo Hong (R, HD-103)
- Stan Gunter (R, HD-008)
- Stacey Evans (D, HD-057)
- Bo Hatchett (R, SD-050)
Votes
- House voteMarch 4, 2025
171 yea, 0 nay (4 not voting, 5 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2025
48 yea, 2 nay (3 not voting, 3 absent)
Topics
- probate courts
- judicial qualifications
- local government
- judges
- Georgia courts