HB295: HB295 Local government; procedures for real property owners to make claims for compensation for loss of property value or expenses incurred; provisions
Last action May 12, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-07-01
House Bill 295 would let property owners in Georgia file compensation claims against county and city governments that fail to enforce certain laws or that maintain a public nuisance, and it lets people sue local officials over immigration sanctuary and detainer violations.
In plain language
Georgia law does not currently give property owners a specific way to seek money from their county or city government when officials decline to enforce laws against things like public camping, loitering, panhandling, drug use, shoplifting, or public intoxication, or when a local government lets a public nuisance persist on nearby property. House Bill 295 creates that process. Owners can file a written claim seeking either their documented mitigation expenses or the drop in their property's fair market value, capped at the property taxes they paid to that local government the prior year. Local governments must act on a claim within 30 days; if they reject it or ignore it, the owner can sue in superior court, where the government carries the burden of proof and a winning owner recovers attorney fees. Owners who file repeated unsuccessful claims on the same property must pay the government's litigation costs. The statute of limitations pauses while a claim is pending, and the General Assembly waives local governments' sovereign immunity for this purpose. The bill also lets anyone harmed by a local government's violation of the state's immigration sanctuary ban or a jail's noncompliance with federal immigration detainer requests seek a priority mandamus order from a superior court.
What the bill does
- Creates a new legal process (O.C.G.A. § 36-60-34) letting real property owners file written compensation claims against local governments for lost property value or mitigation expenses.
- Applies when a local government has a pattern of not enforcing laws on camping, loitering, panhandling, drug possession, shoplifting, or public intoxication, or maintains a public nuisance, or violates the state's immigration sanctuary ban.
- Requires local governments to decide claims within 30 days and pay accepted claims within 30 more days, or face a lawsuit in superior court where the government bears the burden of proof.
- Caps compensation at the amount of property taxes the owner paid to that local government the prior year and lets an owner file once per tax year per parcel.
- Requires owners who lose repeated claims on the same property to pay the local government's litigation costs and attorney's fees.
- Allows anyone harmed by a local government's violation of the immigration sanctuary ban or a jail's failure to honor federal immigration detainer notices to seek priority mandamus relief in superior court.
Who it affects
Real property owners across Georgia who want to file claims; county, municipal, and consolidated governments, which face new financial exposure and a 30 day response deadline; sheriffs, wardens, police chiefs, and prison commissioners who handle immigration detainer notices; and superior courts, which would hear the new compensation and mandamus lawsuits.
Why it matters
Property owners near unenforced public nuisances or crime-related conditions would gain a direct financial remedy against their local government instead of relying on general lawsuits, while local governments would face new claim deadlines, potential payouts limited to a year's property taxes, and possible attorney fee awards if they lose in court.
Key provisions
- Section 1 adds O.C.G.A. § 36-60-34, defining fair market value, local government, owner, and 'policy, pattern, or practice,' and setting the grounds for a compensation claim.
- Subsection (c) lets the owner choose compensation equal to either documented mitigation expenses or the reduction in the property's fair market value.
- Subsection (d) requires local governments to act on a claim within 30 days, pay within 30 days of acceptance, and puts the burden of proof on the government if the owner sues after a rejection or non-response.
- Subsection (e) caps compensation at the amount of ad valorem (property) taxes the owner paid to the local government the prior year.
- Subsection (j) requires an owner with repeated unsuccessful claims on the same parcel to pay the local government's litigation costs and attorney's fees.
- Subsection (k) exempts case-by-case prosecutorial discretion decisions (if published monthly), executive clemency, and acts required by federal or state law from the claim process.
- Subsection (l) waives local governments' sovereign immunity to the extent needed to carry out this claims process.
- Section 2 adds mandamus relief with docket priority for violations of the state's immigration sanctuary ban (O.C.G.A. § 36-80-23); Section 3 adds the same mandamus remedy for violations of the immigration detainer law (O.C.G.A. § 42-1-11.5).
From the bill
“A prevailing owner shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees and costs.”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-07-01
- Act 713
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Agreed House Amend or Sub (Senate)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted As Amended (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
Show full history (21 actions)
- Senate Taken from Table (Senate)
- Senate Tabled (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Houston Gaines (R, HD-120)
- Rob Leverett (R, HD-123)
- Clint Crowe (R, HD-118)
- Jan Jones (R, HD-047)
- Victor Anderson (R, HD-010)
- Jesse Petrea (R, HD-166)
- Clint Dixon (R, SD-045)
Votes
- House voteMarch 4, 2026
98 yea, 75 nay (2 not voting, 2 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 31, 2026
39 yea, 10 nay (2 not voting, 3 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
23 yea, 30 nay (0 not voting, 1 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
32 yea, 21 nay (0 not voting, 1 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
29 yea, 24 nay (0 not voting, 1 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
44 yea, 9 nay (0 not voting, 1 absent)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
30 yea, 22 nay (1 not voting, 1 absent)
- House voteApril 2, 2026
93 yea, 76 nay (2 not voting, 5 absent)
- Senate voteApril 3, 2026
34 yea, 19 nay (0 not voting, 1 absent)
Topics
- local government liability
- property rights
- public nuisance law
- immigration sanctuary policies
- property tax compensation