HR251: HR251 Local government; probate judges shall be elected in nonpartisan elections; provide - CA
Last action May 12, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-07-01
A Georgia House resolution would ask voters to amend the state Constitution so that all probate court judges are elected in nonpartisan elections, removing party labels from those races.
In plain language
Currently, judges for Georgia's superior courts, state courts, the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals are already elected on a nonpartisan basis, but probate judges are not covered by that same constitutional rule. This resolution would amend Article VI, Section VII, Paragraph I of the Georgia Constitution to add probate judges to the list of judges who must run without party affiliation on the ballot. The change would not take effect on its own. Because it is a proposed constitutional amendment, it must go before Georgia voters for ratification. The resolution sets the exact ballot question asking whether the Constitution should be amended to require nonpartisan election of probate court judges, and specifies that a Yes vote favors the change and a No vote opposes it.
What the bill does
- Amends Article VI, Section VII, Paragraph I of the Georgia Constitution to add probate judges to the group of judges elected on a nonpartisan basis.
- Ties probate judges' term lengths to those already set out in Article IX, Section I, Paragraph III rather than changing term lengths itself.
- Leaves all other judges, such as superior court and state court judges, under their existing nonpartisan election rules unchanged.
- Schedules the proposed amendment to be submitted to Georgia voters for ratification or rejection rather than taking effect automatically.
- Specifies the exact wording of the ballot question voters will see, asking whether probate court judges should be elected in nonpartisan elections.
Who it affects
Georgia's probate court judges, who currently may run in partisan elections; candidates seeking probate judge seats; county probate courts, which handle wills, estates, and some licensing matters; and Georgia voters, who would decide the amendment's fate at the ballot box.
Why it matters
If voters ratify this amendment, probate judge races statewide would no longer list party affiliation on the ballot, changing how candidates campaign and how voters choose among them, aligning probate elections with the nonpartisan format already used for other Georgia judgeships.
Key provisions
- Section 1 revises subparagraph (a) of Article VI, Section VII, Paragraph I to state that all probate judges shall be elected on a nonpartisan basis.
- Section 1 ties probate judges' terms to those set in Article IX, Section I, Paragraph III of the Constitution rather than establishing new term lengths.
- Section 2 directs that the proposed amendment be published and submitted to voters as required by Article X, Section I, Paragraph II of the Constitution.
- Section 2 sets the specific ballot question: whether the Constitution should be amended to require nonpartisan election of all probate court judges.
- Section 2 states that if ratified, the amendment becomes part of the Georgia Constitution.
From the bill
“Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to require that all probate court judges be elected in nonpartisan elections?”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-07-01
- Act 638
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Reconsidered Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Reconsidered (Senate)
- Senate Notice to Reconsider (Senate)
- Senate Lost (Senate)
Show full history (20 actions)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Kimberly New (R, HD-040)
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
- James Burchett (R, HD-176)
- Tyler Smith (R, HD-018)
- Mitchell Scoggins (R, HD-014)
- Holt Persinger (R, HD-119)
- Brian Strickland (R, SD-042)
Votes
- House voteFebruary 11, 2026
145 yea, 20 nay (4 not voting, 6 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 19, 2026
31 yea, 18 nay (2 not voting, 3 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 20, 2026
32 yea, 5 nay (17 not voting, 0 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 31, 2026
46 yea, 0 nay (2 not voting, 6 absent)
Topics
- probate court
- judicial elections
- nonpartisan elections
- constitutional amendment
- Georgia Constitution