HB668: HB668 Crimes and offenses; change references to assistance and guide dogs to service dogs
Last action May 11, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-07-01
House Bill 668, the "Mara Jade Act," rewrites Georgia law to replace older terms like "assistance dog" and "guide dog" with "service dog," and creates new tiered criminal penalties for people who harass, injure, or kill a service dog.
In plain language
Georgia law has long used separate terms such as "assistance dog," "guide dog," and "leader dog" across different statutes covering crimes, disability rights, and traffic rules. HB 668 standardizes this language by replacing most of those terms with "service dog" throughout Title 16 (crimes), Chapter 4 of Title 30 (rights of people with disabilities), and Chapter 6 of Title 40 (rules of the road). Beyond the terminology change, the bill restructures the criminal penalties for harming a service dog into three tiers: interfering with a service dog (misdemeanor), harming a service dog (aggravated misdemeanor), and aggravated harming that kills or disables the dog (a felony with a two to ten year prison term and a mandatory minimum). It also updates the rules for training and raising service dogs, requires restitution covering veterinary costs and replacement value when a dog is killed or disabled, and creates a new misdemeanor for falsely claiming a need for a service dog. The bill is named the "Mara Jade Act" and repeals conflicting laws.
What the bill does
- Replaces references to "assistance dog" and "guide dog" with "service dog" across Georgia's criminal code, disability rights law, and traffic rules.
- Creates three tiers of criminal offenses for mistreating a service dog: interfering (misdemeanor), harming (aggravated misdemeanor), and aggravated harming that kills or disables the dog (felony).
- Sets a felony penalty of two to ten years in prison and up to a $50,000 fine for killing or disabling a service dog, with a mandatory minimum two years that cannot be suspended except by agreement between prosecutor and defendant.
- Requires courts to order restitution covering veterinary costs, retraining costs, and the dog's full replacement value if it dies or can no longer work.
- Adds a new misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature for anyone who falsely claims to need a service dog or falsely claims to be a trainer to get accommodations.
- Updates the definitions and rules for owner training, trainers, and dogs still in training, including requirements for leashes, identification, and control.
Who it affects
People with disabilities who use service dogs, service dog trainers and puppy raisers, businesses and public transit operators that must accommodate service dogs, drivers who must yield to pedestrians with service dogs, and anyone accused of harassing, injuring, or misrepresenting the need for a service dog.
Why it matters
People who rely on service dogs would gain clearer, updated legal protections and a felony-level penalty for anyone who kills or seriously injures their dog, plus a guaranteed path to recover replacement costs. Businesses, drivers, and trainers would also operate under more consistent statewide terminology and rules.
Key provisions
- Section 1 names the bill the "Mara Jade Act."
- Section 2 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 16-11-107.1 to create tiered offenses for interfering with, harming, or fatally injuring a service dog, with penalties ranging from a misdemeanor to a felony carrying two to ten years in prison and a $50,000 fine.
- Section 2 also requires restitution for veterinary costs, retraining, and the service dog's full replacement value when a dog dies or can no longer perform its duties.
- Section 3 updates O.C.G.A. § 16-12-120 to allow service dogs on public transit under the new terminology.
- Section 4 rewrites definitions in O.C.G.A. § 30-4-1, defining "service dog," "owner training," and "trainer," and removing the separate "assistance dog" category.
- Section 5 revises O.C.G.A. § 30-4-2 to set rules for accompanying, training, and raising service dogs, including leash, identification, and control requirements.
- Section 7 adds a new misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature in O.C.G.A. § 30-4-4 for people who falsely claim a need for a service dog or falsely claim to be a trainer.
- Section 8 updates O.C.G.A. § 40-6-94 so drivers must yield to pedestrians accompanied by a "service dog" instead of a "guide dog."
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-07-01
- Act 440
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Taken from Table (Senate)
Show full history (21 actions)
- Senate Tabled (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Brad Thomas (R, HD-021)
- Devan Seabaugh (R, HD-034)
- Dale Washburn (R, HD-144)
- Derrick McCollum (R, HD-030)
- Katie Dempsey (R, HD-013)
- Darlene Taylor (R, HD-173)
- Kay Kirkpatrick (R, SD-032)
Votes
- House voteMarch 6, 2026
168 yea, 0 nay (1 not voting, 8 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 27, 2026
26 yea, 22 nay (3 not voting, 3 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 27, 2026
47 yea, 0 nay (2 not voting, 5 absent)
- House voteMarch 31, 2026
168 yea, 0 nay (1 not voting, 7 absent)
Topics
- service dogs
- disability rights
- animal cruelty penalties
- criminal law
- traffic rules