HB 1042: Real Estate Security and Title Act; enact
Last action February 20, 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
House Bill 1042 would let foreclosure lenders submit credit bids at judicial sales, expand privacy protections for judges' spouses on public records, and tighten qualifications for special masters in quiet title cases in Georgia.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
This bill, called the Real Estate Security and Title Act, changes three parts of Georgia law. First, it lets the holder of a foreclosed security instrument (typically a lender) submit a credit bid instead of cash or a cashier's check at a judicial sale, and it adds certified funds and credit union insurance as acceptable payment forms. Second, it expands the existing law shielding judges' and justices' personal information (home address, parcel number, and phone number) from public records so it clearly covers their spouses, and adds new procedures: government entities must flag restricted records, protected people can request access to their own restricted records or authorize a third party to see them, and restrictions can be lifted after the protected person's death. It also creates an exception letting title insurers and their attorneys get unrestricted copies for title insurance purposes. Third, it adds new residency, citizenship, and experience requirements for special masters appointed in quiet title lawsuits.
What the bill does
- Allows the holder of a foreclosed security instrument, or its representative, to submit a credit bid at a judicial sale instead of cash or a cashier's check.
- Adds certified funds and National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund coverage to the list of acceptable payment forms for judicial sale purchases.
- Expands the definition of 'protected person' under Georgia's judicial privacy law (O.C.G.A. § 15-5-110) to explicitly include spouses of current and former judges and justices.
- Requires government entities to mark official record indices, including real estate conveyance records, when personally identifiable information has been restricted.
- Creates procedures letting a protected person access their own restricted records, authorize a third party to view them, or lift the restriction, and allows removal of the restriction after the protected person's death.
- Adds a carve out letting title insurers, their attorneys, and their agents obtain unrestricted copies of records for title insurance purposes, and sets new residency, citizenship, and experience requirements for special masters in quiet title cases.
Who it affects
Purchasers and lenders involved in judicial foreclosure sales, current and former judges and justices and their spouses whose personal information appears in public records, county and state government offices that maintain those records, title insurance companies and their attorneys, and attorneys or judicial circuit residents seeking appointment as special masters in quiet title lawsuits.
Why it matters
Lenders foreclosing on property would gain a faster, cash-free bidding option at judicial sales. Judges' spouses would get clearer legal protection for their home addresses and phone numbers in public records, while title insurers would retain a path to the property records they need, and courts would have stricter standards for who can serve as a special master in disputed land title cases.
Key provisions
- Section 2 revises O.C.G.A. § 9-13-166 to let purchasers use certified funds or a credit bid, and adds credit union deposit insurance as an accepted form of payment guarantee.
- Section 3 revises O.C.G.A. § 15-5-110's definition of 'personally identifiable information' to cover home address, parcel number, and phone number, and redefines 'protected person' to include spouses.
- Section 4 revises O.C.G.A. § 15-5-112 to require flagging of restricted records on official indices within 30 days, and adds new subsections (e) through (j) letting protected persons or authorized third parties access restricted records, letting restrictions be lifted by request or after death, and exempting title insurers and their attorneys from the restriction when providing title insurance.
- Section 4 also makes false attestations under this Code section punishable as perjury under O.C.G.A. § 16-10-70.
- Section 5 revises O.C.G.A. § 23-3-63 to require special masters in quiet title actions to be United States citizens residing in the judicial circuit, Georgia citizens for at least three years, and to have at least five years of experience litigating or opining on Georgia land titles.
From the bill
“the holder of the security instrument being foreclosed or its designated representative shall be authorized to submit a credit bid for the purchase price in lieu of cash, a cashier's check, or certified funds.”
“Have not less than five years of experience litigating or providing opinions on title to land in this state.”
Status timeline
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Matt Reeves (R, HD-099)
- Stan Gunter (R, HD-008)
- Tyler Smith (R, HD-018)
- Stacey Evans (D, HD-057)
- Omari Crawford (D, HD-089)
- Trey Kelley (R, HD-016)
Topics
- foreclosure sales
- judicial privacy
- real estate title insurance
- public records
- quiet title actions