HB 1129: Local government; designation of enterprise zones; provisions
Last action May 11, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-07-01
House Bill 1129 changes how Georgia's largest enterprise zones work, ending automatic state sales tax breaks for big redevelopment projects and capping how many such zones a single county can have.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
Georgia law lets local governments create 'enterprise zones' that offer tax breaks to encourage big redevelopment projects, especially in areas that have been rundown for decades. This bill focuses on a specific type of enterprise zone tied to redevelopment projects worth at least $400 million in areas certified as chronically underdeveloped for 20 years or more. Under current law, projects that qualify for one of these zones automatically get exempted from both local and state sales and use taxes. The bill changes that so the automatic exemption only covers local sales tax; the state sales tax exemption would now require sign-off from the Governor or the Governor's designee. It also lets local governments charge annual infrastructure fees to businesses benefiting from the tax break, limits how those fees and any bonds backed by them can be used, and caps the number of these zones in urban redevelopment areas to four per county. The changes take effect July 1, 2026, and apply to zones designated on or after that date, with the Department of Community Affairs' commissioner now formally approving new zone designations.
What the bill does
- Removes the automatic exemption from state sales and use tax for qualifying enterprise zone redevelopment projects, requiring Governor approval instead.
- Keeps the exemption from local sales and use tax automatic for qualifying projects within these enterprise zones.
- Gives the commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs formal authority to designate nominated areas as enterprise zones rather than treating qualification as automatic.
- Allows local governments to charge annual infrastructure fees to qualifying businesses, capped at the amount of sales tax exempted, which can back revenue bonds for zone infrastructure.
- Bars the use of revenue bond principal to pay back or return the capital investment required to qualify for the zone.
- Limits the number of these large redevelopment enterprise zones to four per county, regardless of which local government created them.
Who it affects
Local governments and urban redevelopment authorities that create enterprise zones, developers behind large redevelopment projects worth $400 million or more, retailers and businesses operating inside those zones, the Governor's office, and the Department of Community Affairs, which now formally approves zone designations.
Why it matters
Big redevelopment projects in these zones would no longer automatically skip state sales tax, meaning the state keeps more revenue unless the Governor approves an exemption. Local governments also face a new four-zone-per-county limit, which could restrict future large-scale redevelopment tax incentives in already-active counties.
Key provisions
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. § 36-88-6(g)(2) so the commissioner must designate a nominated area, rather than automatic qualification, before enterprise zone status applies.
- Section 1 adds § 36-88-6(g)(2)(B), removing automatic state sales and use tax exemption for zone projects unless the Governor or designee approves it.
- Section 1 adds § 36-88-6(g)(4), letting local governing bodies collect annual infrastructure fees from qualifying retailers after the commissioner designates the zone, capped at the amount of tax exempted.
- Section 1 adds § 36-88-6(g)(4)(B), prohibiting use of revenue bond principal to repay or return the capital investment required to qualify for the zone.
- Section 1 adds § 36-88-6(g)(5), capping these enterprise zones at four per county regardless of which local government nominated them.
- Section 1 retains the existing exclusion barring casino gambling projects from qualifying under this subsection.
- Section 2 sets the effective date as July 1, 2026, applying only to zones designated on or after that date.
From the bill
“Any redevelopment project used to qualify an area for designation as an enterprise zone under this subsection shall not, upon approval of such designation, qualify for an exemption of any state sales and use tax levied by this state within the boundaries of such project unless such exemption is approved by the Governor or his or her designee.”
“No enterprise zone shall be designated under this subsection in a county in which four enterprise zones under this subsection are wholly or partially located, regardless of which local governing body or bodies nominated such existing enterprise zones under this subsection.”
“The principal of the revenue bonds provided for under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall not be used, directly or indirectly, to satisfy any obligation on or otherwise provide a return of the capital investment contemplated by subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of this subsection.”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-07-01
- Act 459
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Engrossed (Senate)
Show full history (19 actions)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Recommitted (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Devan Seabaugh (R, HD-034)
- Matthew Gambill (R, HD-015)
- Will Wade (R, HD-009)
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
- Soo Hong (R, HD-103)
- Shaw Blackmon (R, HD-146)
- Bo Hatchett (R, SD-050)
Votes
- House voteMarch 4, 2026
160 yea, 1 nay (4 not voting, 12 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 31, 2026
33 yea, 15 nay (2 not voting, 4 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 31, 2026
45 yea, 2 nay (2 not voting, 5 absent)
- House voteApril 2, 2026
170 yea, 1 nay (3 not voting, 2 absent)
Topics
- enterprise zones
- local sales tax
- economic development
- redevelopment projects
- state tax exemptions