HB 1230: Aviation; prohibit operation of unmanned aircraft systems over a place of incarceration
Last action May 5, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-07-01
A Georgia bill would make it a felony to fly a drone over a prison, jail, or other place of incarceration, and would let law enforcement seize, disable, or destroy drones caught doing so.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
Current Georgia law already restricts using drones to smuggle contraband into prisons or to photograph facilities for criminal purposes, but this bill tightens and expands those rules. It makes it illegal for anyone to knowingly and intentionally fly a drone above a place of incarceration, or to allow someone else to fly one from their property over such a facility, whether to violate contraband rules, to record images for a criminal purpose, or simply to fly over the facility at all. The bill sets felony penalties: one to ten years in prison for drone use tied to contraband violations, and five to ten years for flying over or photographing a facility for criminal purposes. It also lets law enforcement treat violating drones as contraband that can be seized or destroyed, and allows officers to jam, hack, or physically capture drones they reasonably suspect are involved in crime or a public safety threat. Utility workers and compliant operators are exempted. It also updates the statewide drone law (O.C.G.A. § 6-1-4) to match these changes.
What the bill does
- Makes it a felony to knowingly and intentionally operate a drone above a place of incarceration, or to allow someone else to do so from your property.
- Sets prison terms of one to ten years for drone-based contraband violations and five to ten years for flying over or photographing a facility for a criminal purpose.
- Declares drones used in violation of the law to be contraband that police may seize, remove, or destroy at the owner's expense.
- Authorizes law enforcement to use detection, jamming, hacking, or physical capture against drones reasonably suspected of criminal activity or posing a public safety threat near a prison.
- Exempts drone operators following federal rules, peace officers on duty, and utility employees acting within their jobs.
- Updates the state's general drone law (O.C.G.A. § 6-1-4) so its definitions and local preemption rules line up with the new prison-related restrictions.
Who it affects
Drone operators and hobbyists, people who fly drones near correctional facilities, prison and jail wardens and staff, law enforcement agencies that oversee places of incarceration, utility company employees who use drones for work, and anyone convicted of violating the new restrictions.
Why it matters
Georgians who fly drones near prisons or jails, even unintentionally, could face felony charges and years in prison, while law enforcement gains new authority to jam, disable, or destroy drones near these facilities, changing both drone recreation rules and how officers respond to suspected smuggling or surveillance attempts.
Key provisions
- Section 1 amends O.C.G.A. § 42-5-18 to define 'unmanned aircraft system' using the definition in O.C.G.A. § 6-1-4 and adds new prohibited conduct.
- Section 1 makes it unlawful to knowingly and intentionally operate, or let another operate from one's property, a drone in violation of contraband rules, above a place of incarceration, or from one's own property above one such place.
- Section 1 sets penalties: one to ten years for contraband-related drone violations, five to ten years for flying over or recording a facility for criminal purposes.
- Section 1 allows prior authorization from a warden to serve as evidence of noncriminal intent, though lacking authorization alone is not evidence of criminal intent.
- Section 1 declares violating drones contraband subject to seizure or destruction at the owner's expense, and authorizes mitigation measures like jamming or physical capture when there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or a safety threat.
- Section 1 exempts federally compliant operators, peace officers on duty, and utility employees acting within their jobs from these restrictions.
- Section 2 revises O.C.G.A. § 6-1-4 to update the drone definition and local government preemption language to match the new prison provisions.
From the bill
“Unmanned aircraft systems operated in violation of this subsection are declared to be contraband and may be seized, taken, removed, or destroyed or disposed of by law enforcement at the expense of the owner thereof”
“A law enforcement officer or agency may take reasonable and necessary mitigation measures against an unmanned aircraft system operating over of a place of incarceration for the purposes of committing a criminal offense.”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-07-01
- Act 388
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Taken from Table (Senate)
- Senate Tabled (Senate)
Show full history (17 actions)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Todd Jones (R, HD-025)
- Brad Thomas (R, HD-021)
- Clint Crowe (R, HD-118)
- Bill Hitchens (R, HD-161)
- Eddie Lumsden (R, HD-012)
- Shawn Still (R, SD-048)
Votes
- House voteMarch 3, 2026
166 yea, 2 nay (1 not voting, 8 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 27, 2026
26 yea, 22 nay (3 not voting, 3 absent)
- Senate voteMarch 27, 2026
45 yea, 0 nay (4 not voting, 5 absent)
Topics
- drone laws
- prison security
- criminal penalties
- aviation regulation
- law enforcement powers