---
title: HB 1342. Highways; procedures and remedies when a highway improvement project is delayed due to removal, relocation, or adjustment of utility facilities; provide
collection: bills
id: 2025-2026/hb1342
cite_as: HB 1342, 2025-2026 Regular Session (Ga.)
canonical_url: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1342
md_url: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1342.md
text_url: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1342/text
source_url: https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/73284
date: 2026-02-18
status: introduced
corpus_version: bills-2026-09-13
license: Public record of the Georgia General Assembly, via LegiScan; see about.md
publisher: Georgia Commons, an independent project of Georgia Civic Data. Not the State of Georgia. Not legal advice.
up: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026.md
previous: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1341.md
next: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1343.md
index: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/index.md
omitted: votes and history
omitted_chars: 129
omitted_url: https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1342.md?full=1
bill_number: HB 1342
session: 2025-2026 Regular Session
session_slug: 2025-2026
chamber: House
bill_type: bill
status_date: 2026-02-17
last_action: House Second Readers
sponsors:
- Lauren McDonald
- Rick Jasperse
- Lee Hawkins
- Don Parsons
- Brent Cox
- Vance Smith
text_version: Introduced
has_text: true
legiscan_url: https://legiscan.com/GA/bill/HB1342/2025
upstream_id: 2118523
summaries_model: claude-sonnet-5
topic_tags:
- highway construction
- utility regulation
- transportation department
- infrastructure delays
- road construction disputes
---
# HB 1342. Highways; procedures and remedies when a highway improvement project is delayed due to removal, relocation, or adjustment of utility facilities; provide
## Text
House Bill 1342
By: Representatives McDonald III of the 26th, Jasperse of the 11th, Hawkins of the 27th,
Parsons of the 44th, Cox of the 28th, and others
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
To amend Part 1 of Article 6 of Chapter 6 of Title 32 of the Official Code of Georgia
Annotated, relating to regulation of maintenance and use of public road relative to public
utilities in general, so as to provide for procedures and remedies when a highway
improvement project is delayed due to the removal, relocation, or adjustment of utility
facilities; to provide for damages; to repeal provisions relative to mediation boards; to
provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:
SECTION 1.
Part 1 of Article 6 of Chapter 6 of Title 32 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated,
relating to regulation of maintenance and use of public road relative to public utilities in
general, is amended by revising Code Section 32-6-171, relating to authority of department
to order removal, relocation, or adjustment of utility facilities, as follows:
"32-6-171.
(a) Any utility using, occupying, or adjacent to any part of a public road which the
department has undertaken to improve or intends to improve shall remove, relocate, or
make the necessary adjustments to its facility when, in the reasonable opinion of the
department, the facility constitutes an obstruction or interference with the use or safe
operation of such road by the traveling public or when, in the reasonable opinion of the
department, the facility will interfere with such contemplated construction or maintenance.
In undertaking such removal, relocation, or adjustment, if the department has notified the
utility in writing that the facility constitutes an obstruction or interference with the
construction, use, or safe operation of the roadway, then the utility shall be exempt from
the requirements of Code Sections 22-1-10 and 22-1-10.1. Nothing in this Code section
shall be construed so as to deprive any utility relocated from a location in which it owned
a property interest of compensation for such interest.
(b) Whenever the department reasonably determines it necessary to have a utility facility
removed, relocated, or adjusted, the department shall give to the utility at least 60 days'
written notice directing it to begin the physical removal, or relocation, or adjustment of
such utility obstruction or interference. If such notice is part of a highway improvement
project, it is normally shall be provided at the date of advertisement or award; provided,
however, that. However, prior to the notice directing the physical removal, relocation, or
adjustment of a utility facility, the utility and the department shall adhere to the
department's utility relocation procedures for public road improvements which shall
include but not be limited to the following:
(1) The department's submission by the department to the utility of a letter and set of
preliminary plans for the proposed highway improvement project and the utility's
submission to the department of written confirmation acknowledging receipt of the plans;
(2) The utility's submission to the department of plans showing existing and proposed
locations of facilities within a reasonable time as specified by the department in the letter
required under paragraph (1) of this subsection; provided, however, that the time
specified by the department shall not be sooner than 30 days and shall not be greater than
120 days. If the utility fails to submit to the department the plans within the allotted 120
days, the department may no longer be required to pay the costs of removal, relocation,
or adjustment as prescribed in subsection (b) of Code Section 32-6-170 even if those
costs had previously been included in the contract between the department and the
department's contractor; instead, such costs shall be borne by the utility; and
(3) The utility's submission for department approval shall include with the plans a work
plan in a manner and time frame established by the department's written procedures and
instructions. No work plan shall be approved when, in the reasonable opinion of the
department, it causes a highway improvement project to be delayed beyond the
completion time frames established by the department. If the utility fails to submit an
acceptable work plan, the department shall give the utility written notice that if the utility
fails to submit an acceptable work plan within 30 days, the department will let the
proposed highway improvement project. The utility may be liable to the department or
its contractors for costs incurred by the department or its contractors for failure of a utility
to provide an acceptable work plan to the department. If the utility does not thereafter
begin removal, relocation, or adjustment within the time specified in the work plan, the
department may give the utility a final notice directing that such removal, relocation, or
adjustment shall commence not later than ten days from the receipt of such final notice.
If such utility does not, within ten days from receipt of such final notice, begin to remove,
relocate, or adjust the facility or, having so begun removal, relocation, or adjustment,
thereafter fails to complete the removal, relocation, or adjustment within the time
specified in the work plan, the department may exercise its right to obtain injunctive
relief as provided in Code Section 32-6-175. If utility removal, relocation, or adjustment
work is found necessary after the letting date of the highway improvement project, the
utility shall provide a revised work plan within 30 calendar days after becoming aware
of such additional work or upon receipt of the department's written notification advising
of such additional work. The utility's revised work plan shall be reviewed by the
department to ensure compliance with additional work. Once the removal, relocation, or
adjustment of a facility has started, if such removal, relocation, or adjustment falls behind
schedule by 20 percent or more than set forth in the approved work plan, the department
shall suspend the permit of such utility until such removal, relocation, or adjustment
progresses to at least 80 percent or more of the schedule set forth in the approved work
plan.
(c) In addition to the foregoing, the owner of the utility may shall be responsible for and
liable to the department or its contractors for documented damages resulting solely from
failure on the part of the utility to comply with requirements of the submitted and approved
work plan under the control of the utility. If the utility owner fails to provide a work plan
or fails to complete the removal, relocation, or adjustment of its facilities in accordance
with the work plan approved by the department, then the utility owner may shall be liable
to the contractor for delay costs incurred by the contractor and approved by the department
which are caused by or which grow out of the failure of the utility owner to carry out and
complete its work in accordance with the approved work plan or in a timely and reasonable
manner if a work plan or revised work plan was not submitted. Upon notification in
writing by the department or its contractors that the utility is liable for damages or delay
costs, the utility company shall have 45 days from receipt of such letter to either pay the
amount of the damages or delay costs to the department or its contractors or to request
mediation as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section. A utility owner shall not be
subject to the damages or delay costs authorized by this subsection when the utility owner
contracts with and reimburses the department to incorporate the removal, relocation, or
adjustment of such utility owner's facilities into the department's contract for the
development or construction of the highway improvement project.
(d) The department's utility relocation procedures shall include, in addition to the
provisions set forth in subsection (b) of this Code section, provisions for the establishment
of mediation boards to hear and decide disputes that may arise between the department and
the utility concerning (i) a work plan or revised work plan that has been submitted by the
utility but not approved by the department; (ii) a contractor's claim for delay costs or other
damages related to the utility's removal, relocation, or adjustment of its facilities; and (iii)
any other matter related to the removal, relocation, or adjustment of the utility's facilities
pursuant to this Code section. Such procedures shall include but not be limited to the
following:
(1) Each mediation board shall consist of one mediator who shall be designated by the
department, one mediator who shall be designated by the utility, and an independent
mediator who shall be mutually selected by the department's designee and the utility's
designee and shall serve as the presiding officer of the mediation board;
(2) The mediators shall hold a hearing with regard to each dispute that is submitted to
the mediation board for resolution, shall provide notice of the hearing to each party
involved in the dispute, and shall afford each party an opportunity to present evidence at
the hearing; provided, however, that unless the parties otherwise agree, the provisions of
Code Sections 50-13-13, 50-13-14, and 50-13-15, relating to proceedings in a contested
case under the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act, shall not apply to the hearing
before the mediation board;
(3) The mediators shall decide each issue presented to the mediation board by a majority
vote of the mediators;
(4) The mediators shall issue a final decision in writing with regard to each dispute that
is submitted to the mediation board for resolution and shall serve a copy of the final
decision on each party involved in the dispute; and
(5) All final decisions of the mediation board shall be subject to de novo review in the
Superior Court of Fulton County by way of a petition for judicial review filed by the
department or the utility within 30 days after service of the final decision.
(e) The department shall promulgate reasonable regulations governing the mediation
board, including the procedural rules governing the mediation of a contested case and the
creation of a list of qualified mediators. The department shall consult with the Georgia
Utilities Coordinating Council in the development of these regulations, and these
regulations shall be adopted by the department on or before January 1, 2008."
SECTION 2.
All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.
## Summaries written by Georgia Commons
The following was written by claude-sonnet-5 from the text above and is not part of the bill. Quote the text, not the summary.
A Georgia House bill would change how the Department of Transportation handles utility companies that block or delay highway construction projects, adding stricter deadlines, a new permit suspension penalty, and eliminating a mediation option for utility damage disputes.
### Plain-language summary
Under current Georgia law, when a highway project requires a utility company to move or adjust pipes, wires, or other facilities, the Department of Transportation and the utility follow a set process for notice, plans, and work schedules. If the utility falls short, it may owe damages or delay costs, but it can request mediation instead of paying. This bill tightens that process. It requires notice to utilities at the time a project is advertised, makes utilities liable (not just potentially liable) for damages and delay costs when they miss deadlines, and adds a new rule letting the department suspend a utility's work permit if relocation work falls 20 percent or more behind schedule, until the utility catches up to 80 percent of the approved plan.
The bill also eliminates the option for a utility to request mediation over a damages dispute; instead the utility must pay within 45 days of notice. It repeals the sections creating mediation boards altogether, and it adds a new exemption so a utility that pays the department to fold its relocation work into the highway contract is not subject to these damages or delay costs.
### What it does
- Requires the Department of Transportation to give utilities relocation notice at the date of project advertisement, rather than only 'normally' doing so.
- Bars the department from approving a utility work plan that would delay a highway project beyond its established completion time frame.
- Lets the department suspend a utility's permit if its relocation work falls 20 percent or more behind the approved schedule, until it catches up to 80 percent.
- Makes utility owners liable (changed from merely 'may be liable') for documented damages and contractor delay costs caused by their failure to meet an approved work plan.
- Eliminates a utility's option to request mediation over a damages or delay cost dispute; it must instead pay within 45 days of notice.
- Repeals the Code sections establishing mediation boards, their procedures, and required department regulations for resolving utility relocation disputes.
### Who it affects
Utility companies (power, water, gas, telecommunications, and similar providers) with facilities along Georgia public roads, the Georgia Department of Transportation, highway construction contractors, and indirectly the traveling public affected by construction delays.
### Why it matters
Utilities facing highway relocation deadlines would lose their right to mediate damage disputes and instead face direct financial liability and possible permit suspension for falling behind schedule. This could speed up road projects but shifts more legal and financial risk onto utility companies when relocations run late.
### Key provisions
- Section 1 rewrites O.C.G.A. ยง 32-6-171(b) to require notice at project advertisement or award rather than only 'normally' at that time.
- Adds a rule that the department cannot approve a work plan that it reasonably believes will delay the project beyond its set completion time frame.
- If a utility fails to submit an acceptable work plan within 30 days of written notice, the department may proceed to let the highway project and hold the utility liable for resulting costs.
- New language lets the department suspend a utility's permit once relocation work falls 20 percent or more behind the approved schedule, lifting the suspension only once work reaches 80 percent completion.
- Subsection (c) changes utility liability for damages and delay costs from discretionary ('may be liable') to mandatory ('shall be liable').
- Removes the utility's option to request mediation of a damages dispute, requiring payment within 45 days of the department's notice instead.
- Adds an exemption so a utility that pays the department to include its relocation work directly in the highway construction contract is not liable for these damages or delay costs.
- Section 1 repeals subsections (d) and (e) of Code Section 32-6-171, eliminating the mediation board process and related department regulations entirely.
## Status
- Status: Introduced (2026-02-17)
- Last action: House Second Readers (2026-02-18)
- Sponsors: Lauren McDonald, Rick Jasperse, Lee Hawkins, Don Parsons, Brent Cox, Vance Smith
- Official page: https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/73284
> The history, votes, and amendments (129 characters) are at https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb1342.md?full=1