HB 368: De-escalation Right To Know Law; enact
Last action February 12, 2025 · House Second Readers
House Bill 368 would require Georgia police officers to tell drivers the reason for a traffic stop if the driver asks, after showing their driver's license.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Introduced version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
Under current Georgia law, officers who pull someone over for a traffic violation are not explicitly required to explain why they made the stop. House Bill 368, called the 'De-escalation Right To Know Law,' would add a new section to Georgia's motor vehicle code requiring officers to tell a driver the purpose of the stop and the suspected traffic violation, but only if the driver asks and only after the driver has shown their driver's license as already required under Georgia law (O.C.G.A. § 40-5-29). The bill also makes clear that if an officer fails to explain the reason for the stop, that failure does not make an otherwise lawful arrest invalid and does not stop the officer from issuing a traffic ticket. The bill would add this rule to Title 40 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, which governs motor vehicles.
What the bill does
- Creates a new requirement that officers explain the purpose of a traffic stop and the suspected violation if the driver asks.
- Conditions this requirement on the driver first showing their driver's license as current law already requires.
- Clarifies that an officer's failure to explain the stop does not invalidate an otherwise lawful arrest.
- Clarifies that an officer's failure to explain the stop does not prevent them from issuing a traffic citation.
- Gives the new rule a short title, the 'De-escalation Right To Know Law,' for public reference.
Who it affects
Drivers who are pulled over for suspected traffic violations in Georgia, and law enforcement officers who conduct traffic stops, since the bill sets a new procedural expectation for what officers must tell drivers who ask.
Why it matters
If enacted, drivers stopped for traffic violations would have a clear legal basis to ask why they were stopped and get an answer, once they show their license. Because the bill does not penalize officers who skip this step, its practical effect may depend on how consistently the requirement is followed.
Key provisions
- Section 1 names the bill the 'De-escalation Right To Know Law.'
- Section 2 adds new Code Section 40-1-10, requiring an officer to state the purpose of a stop and suspected violation upon the driver's request, after the driver shows a driver's license under O.C.G.A. § 40-5-29.
- Section 2 also specifies that an officer's noncompliance does not invalidate an otherwise lawful arrest or block issuance of a uniform traffic citation.
- Section 3 repeals any conflicting laws.
From the bill
“a law enforcement officer shall provide such operator with the purpose of the stop and suspected traffic law violation, provided that such operator first displays his or her driver's license”
“Failure by a law enforcement officer to comply with this Code section shall not invalidate an otherwise lawful arrest or prevent the issuance of a uniform traffic citation.”
Status timeline
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Dexter Sharper (D, HD-177)
- Bill Hitchens (R, HD-161)
- Eddie Lumsden (R, HD-012)
- Yasmin Neal (D, HD-079)
- Terry Cummings (D, HD-039)
- Eric Bell (D, HD-075)
Topics
- traffic stops
- police accountability
- driver's rights
- law enforcement procedures