House · Introduced · 2025-2026 Regular Session
HB 810: Insurance; require that final reimbursements to pharmacies for prescription drugs are based on certain formulas
Last action March 6, 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
HB810 would require pharmacy benefits managers in Georgia to pay independent pharmacies a set reimbursement formula for prescription drugs, based on national average drug costs plus a dispensing fee, starting July 1, 2027.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
Pharmacy benefits managers (companies that process prescription drug claims for insurers) currently negotiate reimbursement rates with pharmacies, and critics say those rates can be unpredictable or squeeze independent drugstores. HB810 adds a new section to Georgia's pharmacy benefits manager law setting a required formula for what counts as 'eligible pharmacies,' generally those not owned by a company with stakes in more than ten pharmacies. Under the bill, a pharmacy benefits manager must pay an eligible pharmacy the national average drug acquisition cost for a drug, plus a dispensing fee matching the current Georgia Medicaid rate. If that national cost figure is unavailable, the manager must use the wholesale acquisition cost as of January 1, 2026, plus the same dispensing fee. The law would not apply to the State Health Benefit Plan or to Medicaid programs. Pharmacies in rural counties (under 50,000 people) could still be paid more than the formula amount, except for affiliate, mail-order, or specialty pharmacies. The law would take effect July 1, 2027.
What the bill does
- Creates a new Georgia law (O.C.G.A. Section 33-64-9.2) setting a mandatory reimbursement formula pharmacy benefits managers must use for eligible pharmacies.
- Defines 'eligible pharmacy' to exclude pharmacies owned by entities with stakes in more than ten pharmacies, and defines 'affiliate pharmacy' as one connected to a pharmacy benefits manager.
- Requires reimbursement equal to the national average drug acquisition cost plus a dispensing fee matching Georgia's Medicaid dispensing fee rate.
- Bars pharmacy benefits managers from folding these required payments into 'effective rate guarantees' that average reimbursements over time.
- Exempts the State Health Benefit Plan and Medicaid programs from the new reimbursement rules.
- Allows higher payments to rural pharmacies but excludes affiliate, mail-order, and specialty pharmacies from that rural exception.
Who it affects
Independent and small-chain pharmacies across Georgia, especially those in rural counties with fewer than 50,000 residents, as well as pharmacy benefits managers that process prescription drug claims for private insurance plans. State Medicaid programs and the State Health Benefit Plan are explicitly excluded.
Why it matters
Eligible pharmacies would gain a guaranteed minimum payment formula rather than relying on negotiated or fluctuating rates set by pharmacy benefits managers, which could affect their financial stability. Rural pharmacies could still negotiate higher payments, potentially helping keep drugstores open in smaller communities.
Key provisions
- Section 1 adds new Code Section 33-64-9.2 defining 'eligible pharmacy,' 'affiliate pharmacy,' 'rural area,' and 'rural pharmacy' for purposes of the reimbursement rule.
- Subsection (b) sets the reimbursement formula: national average drug acquisition cost plus a Georgia Medicaid-matching dispensing fee, with a fallback to wholesale acquisition cost as of January 1, 2026 if the national figure is unavailable.
- Subsection (b) also bars pharmacy benefits managers from applying 'effective rate guarantees' that average out reimbursements over time to these required payments.
- Subsection (c) exempts the State Health Benefit Plan and Medicaid, including Medicaid managed care organizations, from the new rule.
- Subsection (d) permits higher payments to rural pharmacies but excludes affiliate, mail-order, and specialty pharmacies from that exception.
- Section 2 sets the effective date as July 1, 2027.
From the bill
“'Eligible pharmacy' means a pharmacy which is not owned by an entity or natural person that has an investor or ownership interests in more than ten pharmacies.”
Discussed in meetings (10)
The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.
House Health Committee, February 9, 2026
From 0:50:48 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the substitute would extend the state employee health plan’s pharmacy reimbursement model to commercial plans, addressing payments below drug acquisition costs and pharmacy closures. A National Association of Chain Drug Stores witness described reimbursement based on national average drug acquisition cost plus a $10.64 dispensing payment, protected against later fees or repayments that reduce it. A rural pharmacy owner said losses on some commercial prescriptions threatened the business and that the dispensing payment covers operating expenses. Members asked about consumer costs, price updates, specialty drugs and later fees. Supporters said published acquisition prices update about every 14 days, the bill would prevent later reductions below the required payment, and limiting inflated specialty-drug payments could save money. A Georgia Association of Health Plans witness warned that employers and insured patients would bear added costs, requested a January effective date and an exemption for federally regulated self-funded employer plans, and urged review of insurance department data. The chain-store witness argued that a Supreme Court ruling permits this type of reimbursement regulation. A Pharmaceutical Care Management Association witness opposed the bill, warning of higher patient costs. The committee approved the substitute by voice vote, with no count stated.
House Rules Committee, February 11, 2026
From 0:39:06 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The presenter said HB 810 would set a minimum pharmacy reimbursement based on national average drug-cost data, require a professional dispensing fee and prohibit certain deductions and payment averaging by pharmacy benefit managers. The presenter said underpayments threaten local pharmacies and that 200 Georgia pharmacies had closed since 2015, including two in the presenter's community. The presenter said the bill targets commercial and private insurance, not Medicaid or the state employee plan. No members asked questions. Later, a motion and second were made to place the bill on Thursday's calendar. After a member said they would be absent and requested Tuesday instead, the chair directed the committee to hold off on scheduling it.
House Health Committee, February 18, 2026
From 0:15:17 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor presented a substitute for HB 810, saying the earlier version could harm rural pharmacies by disrupting existing reimbursement arrangements with pharmacy benefit managers. The sponsor said the substitute defined rural areas, protected those arrangements, changed the effective date and simplified related language. One member, citing four or five independent pharmacy closures in the member's area, asked whether the bill protected pharmacies outside rural areas. The sponsor answered that the underlying provisions applied to all Georgia pharmacies and that the rural language addressed a particular problem discovered after the previous committee vote. The committee gave the substitute a do-pass recommendation by voice vote.
House Rules Committee, February 23, 2026
From 1:24:23 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor requested reconsideration of HB 810, which had been returned to the Health Committee the previous week. The sponsor said the bill would establish a pharmacy payment floor and service fee. The sponsor described a new substitute delaying implementation to July 1, 2027, at pharmacy benefit managers' request, and creating an exception requested by small rural pharmacists so they could retain their guaranteed-payment arrangements. There were no questions or calendar vote.
House Rules Committee, March 2, 2026
From 0:17:51 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The committee approved a motion to return HB 810 to the Health Committee. No opposition was heard, and the bill’s contents were not discussed.
House Health Committee, March 5, 2026
From 0:07:06 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor presented a revised version of HB 810, describing it as a compromise focused on smaller, independent pharmacies. In response to a member asking what had changed since the committee previously passed the bill, the sponsor said the earlier version covered large and small pharmacies, while the revision limited eligibility to ownership interests involving up to 10 pharmacies. The sponsor also proposed changing the rural-area population threshold from 35,000 to 50,000, saying 50,000 matched definitions used in recent legislation. The committee approved that amendment and then approved the bill as amended by voice vote. No opposing votes were heard in the transcript, and no numerical tally was announced.
House Rules Committee, March 6, 2026
From 0:55:01 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 2324
Summary by Georgia Commons: A committee member asked for renewed consideration of HB 810, saying it had gone back and forth through committee. The member said the main change limited its application to independent pharmacy owners with fewer than 10 pharmacies. The discussion did not explain the underlying reimbursement provisions. There were no questions or recorded decisions.
House Rules Committee, March 6, 2026
From 0:08:06 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 2324
Summary by Georgia Commons: A motion to place HB 810 on the supplemental calendar received a second. The chair asked for objections and announced that the bill was added without objection. No discussion of its contents occurred.
Status timeline
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Rick Jasperse (R, HD-11)
- Lee Hawkins (R, HD-27)
- Darlene Taylor (R, HD-173)
- Ron Stephens (R, HD-164)
- Mark Newton (R, HD-127)
- Michelle Au (D, HD-50)
Topics
- pharmacy reimbursement
- pharmacy benefits managers
- prescription drug costs
- rural pharmacies
- insurance regulation