HB 984: Crimes and offenses; court order to locate an alleged victim of child or elder abuse; provide
Last action March 6, 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
A Georgia House bill would let superior courts order the location of a parent, guardian, or caretaker when a child or an elder or disabled adult under investigation for abuse is moved to an unknown address.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
Under current Georgia law covering cruelty to children and exploitation of disabled adults, elder persons, and residents, investigators can struggle to check on a potential victim's welfare if that person is moved away from the address police have on file. This bill adds new provisions to two sections of Georgia's criminal code (O.C.G.A. §§ 16-5-70 and 16-5-102) letting a superior court in the county of the last known address issue an order to locate the parent, guardian, or other responsible person of record. To get the order, a law enforcement official must show the court that finding the person is necessary to complete an open investigation into suspected child abuse, or exploitation or intimidation of a disabled adult, elder person, or resident. The bill applies only while an investigation is open and the victim has been moved from a known to an unknown address. It repeals any conflicting laws but does not state a separate effective date beyond standard practice.
What the bill does
- Adds a new subsection to Georgia's cruelty to children law (O.C.G.A. § 16-5-70) allowing a superior court to order the location of a parent or guardian when an abused child has been moved to an unknown address.
- Adds a parallel new subsection to Georgia's law on exploitation and intimidation of disabled adults, elder persons, and residents (O.C.G.A. § 16-5-102) allowing the same kind of location order for a guardian of record.
- Limits use of these orders to cases with an open investigation into an alleged violation of the relevant Code section.
- Requires a law enforcement official to show the court that locating the person is necessary to complete the investigation before the order can be granted.
- Assigns jurisdiction for these orders to the superior court of the county tied to the victim's last known address.
- Repeals any existing state laws that conflict with these new provisions.
Who it affects
The bill affects law enforcement officials investigating suspected abuse of children, disabled adults, elder persons, or residents; superior court judges who would issue these location orders; and parents, guardians, or caretakers of record who could be ordered located by the court.
Why it matters
When a child or a vulnerable adult under investigation disappears from a known address, investigators currently may have no clear legal tool to compel disclosure of a new location. This bill gives law enforcement a specific court process to find the responsible caretaker so welfare checks and abuse investigations can continue.
Key provisions
- Section 1 amends O.C.G.A. § 16-5-70 (cruelty to children) by adding subsection (f), letting the superior court for the county of the child's known address grant an order to locate the parent or guardian of record during an open investigation.
- Section 2 amends O.C.G.A. § 16-5-102 (exploitation and intimidation of disabled adults, elder persons, and residents) by adding subsection (d), creating the same type of order for a guardian of record.
- Both new subsections require a law enforcement official to show the court that locating the person is necessary to complete the investigation.
- Section 3 repeals any conflicting state laws, a standard closing provision.
From the bill
“the superior court for the county of the known address may grant an order to locate the parent or guardian of record upon a showing by a law enforcement official an inquiry regarding the welfare and safety of the child is necessary to complete such investigation.”
“the superior court for the county of the known address may grant an order to locate the guardian of record upon a showing by a law enforcement official an inquiry regarding the welfare and safety of the disabled adult, elder person, or resident is necessary to complete such investigation.”
Status timeline
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Beth Camp (R, HD-135)
- Karen Mathiak (R, HD-082)
- Joseph Gullett (R, HD-019)
- James Burchett (R, HD-176)
- Rick Townsend (R, HD-179)
- Jan Jones (R, HD-047)
Topics
- child abuse investigations
- elder abuse
- disabled adult protection
- court orders
- criminal law