Senate · Engrossed · 2025-2026 Regular Session
SB 151: "Joint Development Authority of North Fulton Municipalities Act"; enact
Last action March 31, 2025 · House Passed/Adopted By Substitute
A Georgia Senate bill would stop certain county development authorities, aimed at Fulton County, from doing tax incentive projects inside north Fulton cities that vote to opt out of that authority's reach.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
Under current Georgia law, a county development authority can offer property tax incentives (through what's often called a tax abatement or incentive project) to businesses anywhere in the county, including inside cities. This bill creates a new Code section, O.C.G.A. § 36-62-4.1, that limits this power for what it calls a 'massively municipalized county': a county with no consolidated city-county government where two or more cities cover at least 95 percent of the county's land. In such a county, the county development authority could no longer buy or take title to property for a tax incentive project inside a city located north of the city where the county courthouse sits, if that city's government has passed a resolution blocking the authority from operating there. The restriction would not apply to projects the authority already approved before January 1, 2026, or to later amendments, refinancing, or renewals of those existing projects. The law would take effect January 1, 2026.
What the bill does
- Creates a new Georgia law (O.C.G.A. § 36-62-4.1) defining a 'massively municipalized county' as one without a consolidated government where cities cover 95 percent or more of its land area.
- Bars a county development authority in such a county from buying or taking title to property for a tax incentive project inside certain north-side cities.
- Requires the affected city to have passed its own resolution opting out before the county authority's power there is limited.
- Exempts projects the authority approved before January 1, 2026, along with their later amendments, refinancing, renewals, or property transfers.
- Sets the law's effective date as January 1, 2026.
Who it affects
County development authorities in heavily city-covered counties without consolidated governments (in practice, this points to Fulton County), city governments north of the county seat within such a county, and businesses seeking property tax incentive deals in those cities. Existing project participants with pre-2026 approvals are unaffected.
Why it matters
Cities in the affected area would gain the ability to block the county development authority from handling tax incentive property deals within their borders, shifting control over local economic development incentives from the county level to individual city governments that choose to opt out.
Key provisions
- Section 1 adds O.C.G.A. § 36-62-4.1, defining 'massively municipalized county' based on the 95 percent land-coverage threshold and lack of a consolidated government.
- Subsection (b) blocks the county development authority from acquiring property for tax incentive projects in qualifying north-side municipalities that pass an opt-out resolution.
- Subsection (c) protects projects approved before January 1, 2026, and their future amendments, refinancing, or renewals from the new restriction.
- Section 2 sets the effective date as January 1, 2026.
- Section 3 repeals conflicting laws.
From the bill
“the term 'massively municipalized county' means any county without a consolidated or unified government in which the corporate limits of two or more municipalities cover 95 percent or more of the land area of the county”
“if the governing authority of the municipality in which such property is located has adopted a resolution to limit such development authority from operating within such municipality”
Status timeline
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
Show full history (14 actions)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Withdrawn & Recommitted (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Brandon Beach (R, SD-21)
- John Albers (R, SD-56)
- Shawn Still (R, SD-48)
- Jan Jones (R, HD-47)
Votes
- Senate voteFebruary 26, 2025
31 yea, 23 nay (2 not voting, 0 excused)
- Senate voteMarch 3, 2025
32 yea, 23 nay (0 not voting, 1 excused)
- House voteMarch 31, 2025
101 yea, 63 nay (6 not voting, 10 excused)
Topics
- development authorities
- tax incentives
- Fulton County
- local government powers
- economic development