Senate · Engrossed · 2025-2026 Regular Session
SB 230: Condominiums; maximum amount of insurance deductibles payable by unit owners; remove the limitation
Last action March 20, 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
A House substitute to SB 230, now called the 'Real Estate Security and Title Act,' would raise the cap on condo insurance deductibles unit owners can be charged, expand protections for judges' personal information, change how judicial foreclosure sales can be paid for, and tighten qualifications for special masters in quiet title cases.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
SB 230 started as a narrow bill about condominium insurance deductibles, but the House Insurance Committee's substitute folds in several unrelated real estate and courts topics under one new short title, the Real Estate Security and Title Act. On condos, it raises the cap on how much of an insurance deductible a condo association can pass on to an individual unit owner after a covered casualty, from $5,000 to $25,000 per loss, and requires associations to notify unit owners in writing whenever the master policy deductible changes materially. Separately, the bill expands who counts as a protected person under Georgia's law shielding judges' and their spouses' personal information from public records, broadens the definition of personally identifiable information, and adds new procedures for protected people or their designated representatives to get access to restricted records, request removal of a restriction, or authorize title insurers to see unredacted property records. It also lets the holder of a foreclosed security instrument submit a credit bid instead of cash at a judicial sale, and tightens the qualifications required to serve as a special master in quiet title lawsuits, requiring state citizenship for three years and five years of relevant title litigation experience.
What the bill does
- Raises the maximum insurance deductible a condominium association can charge to an individual unit owner after a covered casualty loss from $5,000 to $25,000 per incident.
- Requires condo associations to give unit owners written notice whenever there is a material change to the master insurance policy's deductible.
- Expands the legal definition of 'protected person' in Georgia's judicial privacy law to explicitly include spouses of current and former judges and justices, and broadens what counts as their personally identifiable information.
- Creates new procedures letting protected judges and their spouses, or authorized third parties like title insurers, request access to records that have had personal information restricted, or request that a restriction be lifted.
- Allows the entity foreclosing on a property to submit a credit bid instead of cash, a cashier's check, or certified funds when purchasing the property at a judicial sale.
- Tightens qualifications to serve as a special master in quiet title lawsuits, requiring three years of Georgia citizenship and five years of experience litigating or advising on land title matters.
Who it affects
Condominium unit owners and homeowners associations, current and former judges and justices and their spouses, state and local government agencies that hold public records (such as the Secretary of State, tax assessors, and clerks of court), title insurers and their attorneys, foreclosing lenders, and people involved in quiet title lawsuits over land ownership.
Why it matters
Condo owners could face much larger out-of-pocket insurance deductible bills after damage to their unit, up from a $5,000 cap to $25,000. Judges and spouses would get stronger privacy protections in public records, while lenders foreclosing on property would gain a new way to pay at auction without cash.
Key provisions
- Section 2 amends O.C.G.A. § 9-13-166 to let a foreclosing lender submit a credit bid instead of cash or a certified check at a judicial sale.
- Section 3 amends O.C.G.A. § 15-5-110 to redefine 'protected person' to explicitly include spouses of current and former judges, and to redefine what counts as their personally identifiable information.
- Section 4 amends O.C.G.A. § 15-5-112 to add procedures for protected persons and third parties like title insurers to access or release restricted records, with a 30-day compliance window for restriction requests and a 45-day window for release requests.
- Section 5 amends O.C.G.A. § 23-3-63 to require special masters in quiet title cases to be U.S. residents of the judicial circuit, Georgia citizens for three years, and have five years of relevant title litigation experience.
- Section 6 amends O.C.G.A. § 44-3-94 to raise the per-unit insurance deductible cap condo associations can pass to owners from $5,000 to $25,000 and to require written notice of material deductible changes.
- Section 1 gives the overall Act the short title 'Real Estate Security and Title Act.'
From the bill
“the amount of deductible which can be allocated to any one unit owner shall not exceed $5,000.00 $25,000.00 per casualty loss covered under any insurance required to be maintained by the association under this article.”
“the holder of the security instrument being foreclosed or its designated representative shall be authorized to submit a credit bid for the purchase price in lieu of cash, a cashier's check, or certified funds.”
“Any person making a false attestation under this Code section is subject to the penalty of perjury under Code Section 16-10-70.”
Discussed in meetings (11)
The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.
Senate Insurance and Labor Committee, February 17, 2026
From 1:04:29 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor initially presented removal of the $5,000 limit on condominium insurance deductibles chargeable to unit owners. An attorney volunteering for the Community Associations Institute said associations struggled to obtain affordable coverage with that deductible. The attorney said higher deductibles left gaps funded through reserves or special charges to all owners. A second institute witness, a community association manager and insurance agent, said owners’ individual condominium policies could cover higher deductibles more affordably. Members questioned unlimited increases, affordability, individual-policy premiums and how associations could legally charge owners for the gap. The witnesses said many owners already carried coverage for higher water deductibles and said the change would not increase individual-policy premiums. The attorney said special charges depended on associations’ governing documents. A member suggested raising the cap to $25,000 rather than removing it. The sponsor then located a previously approved committee version that did exactly that and required timely written notice of significant deductible changes, with delivery alternatives allowed by owners’ written consent. Members said the folders contained the original bill rather than that committee version. The chair said the committee would return with the correct version at the next meeting. No vote was taken.
Senate Insurance and Labor Committee, February 19, 2026
From 0:21:03 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor presented a substitute raising the maximum condominium insurance deductible payable by a unit owner from $5,000 to $25,000, rather than removing the cap entirely, and adding notification language. A committee member with insurance experience said associations could not obtain master policies with $5,000 deductibles and that the existing cap could leave a $20,000 gap when a master policy had a $25,000 deductible. That member said individual condominium policies could cover the gap under the change, instead of spreading the expense among owners through assessments. Members questioned whether individual premiums would rise and whether those policies had adequate coverage limits. The member expected little premium impact but acknowledged limited experience with condominium policies. The chair clarified that assessment coverage limits vary by insurer and owners should check their policies. A witness for the Community Associations Institute also acknowledged not being an insurance expert. Members discussed whether lenders or associations require individual coverage, without establishing how many owners lack it. Another member questioned whether owners would face additional costs and whether board approval was needed. The chair said boards negotiate master policies and owners elect boards. The committee approved the substitute, with the chair counting six in favor and one opposed.
Senate Rules Committee, February 25, 2026
From 0:21:12 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the bill would raise the condominium insurance deductible cap from $5,000 to $25,000, describing the existing cap as nearly two decades old. The sponsor also described a committee amendment requiring timely notice of changes to a master policy's deductible. No questions followed, and the bill was not selected for the floor calendar.
Senate Rules Committee, February 26, 2026
From 0:12:30 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The chair briefly called up SB 230 and said it had already been covered. No further explanation or action followed.
Senate Rules Committee, March 3, 2026
From 0:20:41 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 230 would raise the condominium insurance deductible cap from $5,000 to $25,000. The sponsor said the cap had not increased in more than two decades and that the change would make master policies more competitive. No substantive questions followed. Members selected the bill for the calendar as part of the approved slate.
Senate floor session, March 4, 2026 (legislative day 27)
From 5:37:39 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Third Read)
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 230 would allow higher deductibles on condominium master insurance policies to help associations obtain more competitive rates. The sponsor distinguished the building-wide policy from individual unit policies and said the change aimed to improve affordability. The clerk described the committee substitute as increasing, rather than eliminating, the maximum deductible payable by unit owners and adding notice requirements. An amendment sponsor proposed repealing the state restriction on local rent regulation, saying cities and counties should decide whether to regulate rents. The amendment sponsor cited rising rents and students’ difficulty finding housing near campuses, and said 44 other states allowed local control. A questioning senator raised whether rent regulation would reduce housing supply. Another senator supported the amendment as a concrete way to address renters’ costs. The amendment failed 22-32. The Senate adopted the committee substitute and passed it 51-2.
House Insurance Committee, March 20, 2026
From 0:37:45 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 230 would raise the condominium master-policy deductible cap from $5,000 to $25,000 and require notice when the deductible changes. The sponsor said the existing cap limited competitive insurance options and that the industry considered $25,000 a workable level for obtaining lower premiums. Asked about costs to unit owners, a property-management broker and insurance agent said most owners’ condominium policies already covered that deductible amount and that the witness was not seeing related premium increases. Another member raised concerns about special assessments and possible foreclosure. The witness answered that special assessments were governed separately and were not addressed by this bill. A committee member explained that the substitute also included HB 1042, describing confidentiality protections for judges’ addresses and title-insurance provisions. The committee approved the substitute by voice vote, with no numerical count stated.
House Rules Committee, March 31, 2026
From 0:52:35 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel
Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor gave an update on SB 230, saying it began as a measure about condominium master-policy insurance deductibles but had expanded substantially in the House Insurance Committee. The sponsor said sections one through five contained another House member's proposal, while section six retained the underlying measure. The added provisions were not explained. There were no questions or recorded decisions.
Status timeline
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Recommitted (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
Show full history (11 actions)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Shawn Still (R, SD-48)
- Jason Anavitarte (R, SD-31)
- Marty Harbin (R, SD-16)
- Ed Harbison (D, SD-15)
- Larry Walker, III (R, SD-20)
- Matt Reeves (R, HD-99)
Votes
- Senate voteMarch 4, 2026
22 yea, 32 nay (0 not voting, 1 excused)
- Senate voteMarch 4, 2026
51 yea, 2 nay (1 not voting, 1 excused)
Topics
- condominium insurance
- property law
- judicial privacy protections
- foreclosure sales
- title insurance