SB 268: Offenses Against Public Order; crime of interference with a first responder; provide
Last action March 19, 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
A Georgia Senate bill would create a new crime for approaching or interfering with first responders after a warning, and would add step-grandparents and step-grandchildren to the state's incest law.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
This bill changes two parts of Georgia's criminal code. First, it expands the incest statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-6-22) so that sexual relations between a step-grandparent and step-grandchild count as incest, alongside existing blood and adopted grandparent-grandchild relationships. Second, it creates a brand new crime called interference with a first responder (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-46). A person commits this crime if, after a first responder such as a paramedic, firefighter, or police-affiliated rescuer tells them not to approach, they knowingly and willfully come within 25 feet of that responder anyway while intending to impede their work, threaten them with physical harm, or harass them. The bill defines 'first responder' broadly to include anyone who provides on-site emergency care before an ambulance arrives, and defines 'harass' as conduct meant to cause substantial emotional distress with no legitimate purpose. Violating this new law is a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature, a more serious misdemeanor category under Georgia law.
What the bill does
- Adds step-grandparent and step-grandchild relationships to the list of family relationships covered by Georgia's incest law (O.C.G.A. § 16-6-22).
- Creates a new crime, interference with a first responder, for approaching within 25 feet of a warned-off first responder with intent to impede, threaten, or harass them.
- Defines 'first responder' to include any person or agency giving on-site emergency care before an ambulance arrives, including those affiliated with police, fire, or rescue agencies.
- Defines 'harass' as willful conduct aimed at a first responder that intentionally causes substantial emotional distress and serves no legitimate purpose.
- Sets the penalty for the new interference crime as a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature, a harsher misdemeanor tier than a standard misdemeanor.
Who it affects
First responders such as paramedics, firefighters, and rescue workers who could invoke the new 25-foot warning rule; bystanders, protesters, or family members at emergency scenes who might be charged under it; and people with step-grandparent or step-grandchild relationships who would newly fall under the incest statute.
Why it matters
First responders would gain a legal tool to keep people at a distance during emergencies by issuing a verbal warning, and anyone who ignores that warning with intent to interfere, threaten, or harass could face a serious misdemeanor charge. The incest law change closes a gap for step-grandparent relationships that were not previously covered.
Key provisions
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. § 16-6-22(4) to add step-grandparent and step-grandchild to the relationships covered by the incest offense.
- Section 2 adds new Code Section 16-11-46, creating the crime of interference with a first responder.
- Subsection (a) defines 'first responder' and 'harass' for purposes of the new offense.
- Subsection (b) requires a prior verbal warning not to approach and sets the 25-foot boundary and the three intents (impede, threaten, harass) that trigger the crime.
- Subsection (c) sets the penalty as a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.
- Section 3 repeals conflicting laws.
From the bill
“A person commits the offense of interference with a first responder when he or she, after receiving a verbal warning not to approach from a person he or she knows or reasonably should know is a first responder”
“'Harass' means to willfully engage in any conduct directed at a first responder which intentionally causes substantial emotional distress in that first responder and serves no legitimate purpose.”
Status timeline
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Taken from Table (Senate)
Show full history (13 actions)
- Senate Tabled (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Randy Robertson (R, SD-029)
- Steve Gooch (R, SD-051)
- John Albers (R, SD-056)
- Timothy Bearden (R, SD-030)
- Chuck Payne (R, SD-054)
- Tim Fleming (R, HD-114)
Votes
- Senate voteMarch 6, 2025
38 yea, 17 nay (1 not voting, 0 absent)
Topics
- first responders
- public safety law
- misdemeanor penalties
- incest law
- emergency scenes