Georgia Commons

Senate · Passed · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 444: Private Review Agents; certain decisions with regard to the provision of insurance coverage for healthcare services shall not be based solely on artificial intelligence systems; provide

Last action May 5, 2026 · Effective Date 2027-01-01

Senate Bill 444 would require that health insurance companies in Georgia have a licensed medical reviewer, not just artificial intelligence, sign off before denying coverage for a healthcare service.

Read the full bill text

These buttons carry the bill's own text, not the summaries below. Copy for LLM, View as markdown, and Send to AI use the Markdown version: the text as filed, then the summaries under a heading that names them as ours. View raw is the text alone.

The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest LegiScan holds.

In plain language

Georgia insurance companies use private review agents and utilization review entities to decide whether to approve or deny coverage for medical treatments. This bill adds a new section to Georgia's insurance law (O.C.G.A. Chapter 46 of Title 33) addressing how artificial intelligence can be used in that process. The bill allows insurers to use artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence, or other software tools to automate tasks and help with decision-making, as long as those tools are part of an approved utilization review plan. However, it prohibits AI from issuing a final denial of coverage (called an adverse determination) to a patient on its own. A human private review agent or utilization review entity, including a clinical peer, must be involved before a denial is finalized, and AI cannot override that person's judgment. The law would take effect January 1, 2027.

What the bill does

  • Adds a new Code section (33-46-7.1) letting insurers use AI systems for utilization review, but only within an approved review plan.
  • Bars AI systems from issuing an adverse determination (a coverage denial) to a patient without a human private review agent or utilization review entity involved.
  • Requires a clinical peer, a medical professional with relevant expertise, to participate before a denial is finalized.
  • States that AI tools cannot override or supersede the judgment of the clinical peer reviewing the case.
  • Defines 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence system' for purposes of this insurance law.
  • Sets the law to take effect January 1, 2027.

Who it affects

Health insurance companies and their private review agents and utilization review entities in Georgia, the clinical peers (licensed medical professionals) who review coverage decisions, and patients whose insurance claims go through utilization review for healthcare services.

Why it matters

Patients seeking insurance approval for medical care would be guaranteed that a human medical reviewer, not just an automated algorithm, has a role in any decision to deny coverage. This could affect how quickly and how coverage denials are issued by Georgia insurers.

Key provisions

  • Section 1 adds Code Section 33-46-7.1 defining 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence system' for insurance review purposes.
  • Subsection (b) permits private review agents and utilization review entities to use AI tools if they are part of a compliant utilization review plan approved under existing standards and Commissioner rules.
  • Subsection (c) allows AI to automate tasks and assist decision-making but bars it from issuing an adverse determination without a human private review agent or utilization review entity and a participating clinical peer.
  • Subsection (c) also states AI tools cannot supersede the judgment of the clinical peer involved in the review.
  • Section 2 sets the effective date as January 1, 2027.
  • Section 3 repeals conflicting laws.

From the bill

such systems shall not issue an adverse determination to a patient until a natural person qualifying as a private review agent or a utilization review entity conducts a utilization review in which a clinical peer participates.

This requires a human medical reviewer to be involved before AI can be used to deny a patient's coverage.

In no event shall artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence, or other software tools supersede the judgment of such clinical peer.

This ensures AI recommendations cannot override the decision of the human clinical reviewer.

Status timeline

  1. 2026-05-05Effective Date 2027-01-01
  2. 2026-05-05Act 411
  3. 2026-05-05Senate Date Signed by Governor (Senate)
  4. 2026-04-10Senate Sent to Governor (Senate)
  5. 2026-03-25Senate Agreed House Amend or Sub (Senate)
  6. 2026-03-19House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
  7. 2026-03-19House Third Readers (House)
  8. 2026-03-18House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
Show full history (16 actions)
  1. 2026-02-17House Second Readers (House)
  2. 2026-02-12House First Readers (House)
  3. 2026-02-11Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
  4. 2026-02-11Senate Third Read (Senate)
  5. 2026-02-09Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
  6. 2026-02-06Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
  7. 2026-02-03Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
  8. 2026-02-02Senate Hopper (Senate)

Sponsors

  • Kay Kirkpatrick (R, SD-032)Primary sponsor
  • Ben Watson (R, SD-001)
  • Mike Hodges (R, SD-003)
  • Ed Harbison (D, SD-015)
  • Larry Walker (R, SD-020)
  • Lee Hawkins (R, HD-027)

Votes

  1. PassedSenate voteFebruary 11, 2026

    49 yea, 0 nay (0 not voting, 5 absent)

    Passage: Senate Vote #540

  2. PassedHouse voteMarch 19, 2026

    166 yea, 0 nay (3 not voting, 7 absent)

    Passage: House Vote #729

  3. PassedSenate voteMarch 25, 2026

    47 yea, 0 nay (2 not voting, 5 absent)

    Agree To House Substitute: Senate Vote #821

Topics

  • health insurance
  • artificial intelligence regulation
  • insurance coverage denials
  • utilization review
  • healthcare policy

Ask about this bill

Answers come from this document. Not legal advice.

Machine-readable https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/sb444.md · https://georgiacommons.org/bills/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp

SB444: Private Review Agents; certain decisions with regard to the provision of insurance coverage for healthcare services shall not be based solely on artificial intelligence systems; provide | Georgia Commons