HB1369: HB1369 Law and statutes; effect and enforcement of foreign laws; revise provisions
Last action February 20, 2026 · House Second Readers
A Georgia House bill would bar state courts, arbitrators, and agencies from enforcing foreign laws that violate rights guaranteed by the U.S. or Georgia Constitutions, and would tighten the rules judges use to send lawsuits to courts outside the country.
In plain language
Georgia law already limits when foreign laws and legal systems can be applied in state courts. This bill rewrites that law (O.C.G.A. § 1-3-9) to add clear definitions of 'foreign law' and 'tribunal' (which includes courts, agencies, arbitrators, and arbitration panels), and to say that any ruling based even partly on a foreign law that denies a party's constitutional rights is void and unenforceable. It carves out exceptions for international arbitration cases, certain business filings, and contracts where a company agrees to follow foreign law, except family law contracts like prenuptial or divorce agreements. The bill also changes the 'forum non conveniens' rule, which lets a judge send a lawsuit to a different, more appropriate court. Judges would have to consider whether a foreign court's laws would violate constitutional rights before letting a case move there, and a related venue statute (O.C.G.A. § 9-10-31.1) is amended so judges must, rather than may, require defendants to waive statute of limitations defenses before dismissing a case to another forum. The changes would take effect July 1, 2026, and apply to contracts executed or renewed after that date.
What the bill does
- Rewrites O.C.G.A. § 1-3-9 to void any court, arbitration, or agency ruling based in whole or part on a foreign law that denies rights guaranteed by the U.S. or Georgia Constitutions.
- Adds legal definitions for 'foreign law' (excluding Native American tribal law) and 'tribunal' (courts, agencies, arbitrators, and arbitration panels).
- Creates exceptions for international arbitration cases and for businesses that contract to follow foreign law, but not for family law agreements like prenuptial or divorce contracts.
- Requires judges deciding whether to move a lawsuit to a foreign court to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that the foreign legal system would not violate constitutional rights.
- Changes the venue law (O.C.G.A. § 9-10-31.1) so courts must, rather than may, dismiss a case only after defendants waive statute of limitations defenses, and adds Code Section 1-3-9 as a factor judges must weigh.
- Requires a tribunal to issue written findings of fact and legal conclusions if it denies the protections created by this law.
Who it affects
The bill affects Georgia courts, administrative agencies, and arbitration panels; parties in lawsuits or arbitrations that involve foreign law, including international business contracts; and people in family law cases such as divorce, adoption, or prenuptial agreements, who are excluded from one of the exceptions.
Why it matters
If enacted, Georgians and businesses involved in cross-border disputes could see foreign-law-based rulings thrown out if they clash with constitutional rights, and judges would face a higher bar before sending lawsuits to courts outside the country, changing how international contract and family law disputes are handled in Georgia.
Key provisions
- Section 1 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 1-3-9(a) to define 'foreign law' and 'tribunal,' explicitly excluding Native American tribal law from the definition of foreign law.
- Section 1(c) voids any tribunal ruling based wholly or partly on a foreign law that denies constitutional rights and privileges.
- Section 1(d) exempts international arbitration, a specific Title 14 business statute, and companies that contract to follow foreign law, but carves family law contracts back out of that business exception.
- Section 1(e) requires clear and convincing evidence that a foreign jurisdiction's laws would not violate constitutional rights before a court can send a case there under forum non conveniens.
- Section 1(f) requires a tribunal that denies these protections to issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
- Section 2 amends O.C.G.A. § 9-10-31.1 to add consideration of Code Section 1-3-9 as a factor in forum non conveniens decisions and changes dismissal from discretionary ('may') to mandatory ('shall') once defendants waive statute of limitations defenses.
- The Act takes effect July 1, 2026, and applies to contracts executed or renewed on or after that date.
Status timeline
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- David Clark (R, HD-100)
- Josh Bonner (R, HD-073)
- Carter Barrett (R, HD-024)
- Jordan Ridley (R, HD-022)
- Mitchell Horner (R, HD-003)
- Alan Powell (R, HD-033)
Topics
- foreign law
- courts and litigation
- forum non conveniens
- constitutional rights
- family law