SR988: SR988 U.S. Congress; to cancel the proposed plutonium pit plant at the U.S. Department of Energy's Savannah River Site; urge
Last action March 19, 2026 · Senate Read and Referred
A Georgia Senate resolution urges the U.S. Congress to cancel a proposed plutonium pit production facility at the Savannah River Site, citing risks to the Savannah River and nearby Georgia counties.
In plain language
The Savannah River Site in South Carolina, once used to make plutonium for nuclear weapons, shifted decades ago to waste management and environmental cleanup. This resolution says the National Nuclear Security Administration is now drafting an environmental impact statement for a new plutonium pit production facility there, with public hearings expected in 2026. The resolution lays out concerns about fire, explosion, worker exposure, and radioactive contamination risks tied to plutonium pit production, and notes that the Savannah River flows past the Georgia counties of Burke, Screven, Effingham, and Chatham, where radionuclides from the site have already been detected in water, soil, and wildlife. It formally asks the U.S. Congress and Georgia's congressional delegation to cancel the proposed facility, and directs the Secretary of the Senate to distribute copies of the resolution to the public and press.
What the bill does
- Formally urges the United States Congress and Georgia's congressional delegation to immediately cancel the proposed plutonium pit production facility at the Savannah River Site.
- States the Georgia Senate's position on a federal nuclear weapons manufacturing project without changing any Georgia law.
- Directs the Secretary of the Senate to make copies of the resolution available to the public and press.
- Documents specific concerns, including fire and explosion risk, worker exposure, and contamination of the Savannah River watershed that borders four Georgia counties.
Who it affects
Residents of the Georgia counties of Burke, Screven, Effingham, and Chatham along the Savannah River, workers at the Savannah River Site, Georgia's congressional delegation in Washington, and the federal Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversee the proposed facility.
Why it matters
The resolution carries no legal force but puts the Georgia Senate on record opposing a federal project it says could raise risks of radioactive contamination in the Savannah River watershed, potentially influencing how Georgia's federal lawmakers respond during the facility's public comment process in 2026.
Key provisions
- The whereas clauses describe the Savannah River Site's history, its shift from weapons production to waste cleanup, and the ongoing draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for a new plutonium pit facility.
- The whereas clauses note that plutonium has a 24,000 year radioactive half-life and is linked to increased cancer deaths among occupationally exposed workers.
- The whereas clauses identify Burke, Screven, Effingham, and Chatham counties as downstream Georgia counties where radionuclides from the site have already been detected.
- The first resolving clause urges Congress and Georgia's federal delegation to cancel the proposed plutonium pit production facility.
- The second resolving clause directs the Secretary of the Senate to distribute copies of the resolution to the public and press.
Status timeline
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Nan Orrock (D, SD-036)
- Sally Harrell (D, SD-040)
- Tonya Anderson (D, SD-043)
- Gail Davenport (D, SD-017)
- Randal Mangham (D, SD-055)
- Donzella James (D, SD-028)
- Michael Rhett (D, SD-033)
- Jaha Howard (D, SD-035)
- David Lucas (D, SD-026)
- Nikki Merritt (D, SD-009)
- Freddie Sims (D, SD-012)
- Sheikh Rahman (D, SD-005)
- Ed Harbison (D, SD-015)
- Kim Jackson (D, SD-041)
- Elena Parent (D, SD-044)
- Harold Jones (D, SD-022)
- Kenya Wicks (D, SD-034)
Topics
- nuclear weapons production
- Savannah River Site
- environmental safety
- radioactive contamination
- federal advocacy