--- title: O.C.G.A. § 13-3-41. Types of consideration. collection: code id: 13-3-41 cite_as: O.C.G.A. § 13-3-41 (2025) canonical_url: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3-41 md_url: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3-41.md text_url: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3-41/text source_url: https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/document/docs/default-source/joint-features-document-library/t13-(v11)-2010-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=e4dbdcfd_0#page=193 date: 2025 status: active corpus_version: 2025-supplement-89aa39ab3c68 license: CC0-1.0 publisher: Georgia Commons, an independent project of Georgia Civic Data. Not the State of Georgia. Not legal advice. up: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3.md previous: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3-40.md next: https://georgiacommons.org/code/13-3-42.md index: https://georgiacommons.org/code/index.md version: the only printed version in_force: true current_through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly heading_path: CONTRACTS / ELEMENTS AND FORMATION GENERALLY / CONSIDERATION --- # O.C.G.A. § 13-3-41. Types of consideration. Considerations are distinguished into ‘‘good’’ and ‘‘valuable.’’ A good consideration is such as is founded on natural duty and affection or on a strong moral obligation. A valuable consideration is founded on money or something convertible into money or having a value in money, except marriage, which is a valuable consideration. ## History Orig. Code 1863, § 2705; Code 1868, § 2699; Code 1873, § 2741; Code 1882, § 2741; Civil Code 1895, § 3658; Civil Code 1910, § 4243; Code 1933, § 20-303. ## Cross References Additional provisions relating to marriage as valuable consideration, § 19-3-60. ## Law Reviews For article discussing the anachronistic nature of the Georgia contracts Code as dramatized by comparing the doctrine of consideration as it is formulated in the Restatements of Contracts and in Code 1933, Title 20 (now this title), and the interpretative approach Georgia courts have taken in dealing with such Code, see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 499 (1979). (But see amendments by Ga. L. 1981, p. 876.) For comment on property interest of inventor as valuable consideration, in light of Alexis, Inc. v. Werbell, 209 Ga. 665, 75 S.E.2d 168 (1953), see 5 Mercer L. Rev. 208 (1953).