Skip to content
Georgia Commons
Menu

Official Code of Georgia Annotated

Title 15. COURTS · Chapter 23. COURT-CONNECTED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

15-23-10. Determination of need as prerequisite to establishment of program.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

  1. No alternative dispute resolution program shall be established for any court unless the judge or a majority of the judges of such court determine that there is a need for such program in that court. The funding mechanism set forth in this chapter shall be available to any court, including the juvenile court, which, having determined that a court-annexed or court-referred alternative dispute resolution program would make a positive contribution to the ends of justice in that court, has developed a program meeting the standards of the Supreme Court of Georgia Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and appendices. Pursuant to the standards set forth in the Supreme Court of Georgia Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and appendices, the funding mechanism set forth in this chapter shall be available to court programs in which cases are screened by the judge or by the program director under the supervision of the judge on a case-by-case basis to determine whether:

  2. (1)

    The case is appropriate for the process;#

  3. (2)

    The parties are able to compensate the neutral if compensation is required; and#

  4. (3)

    A need for emergency relief makes referral inappropriate until the request for relief is heard by the court.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Code 1981, § 15-23-10, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1529, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 874, § 5; Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 4-6/HB 242.

Editor's notes

Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 5-1/HB 242, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: ‘‘This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2014, and shall apply to all offenses which occur and juvenile proceedings commenced on and after such date. Any offense occurring before January 1, 2014, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior adjudication for the purpose of imposing a disposition that provides for a different penalty for subsequent adjudications, of whatever class, pursuant to this Act. The enactment of this Act shall not affect any prosecutions for acts occurring before January 1, 2014, and shall not act as an abatement of any such prosecutions.’’

Code Commission notes

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1997, ‘‘case-by-case’’ was substituted for ‘‘case-by-base’’ at the end of the introductory paragraph.

Other notes

The 2013 amendment, effective January 1, 2014, in the second sentence of the introductory language, inserted ‘‘, including the juvenile court,’’ near the beginning and substituted ‘‘Supreme Court of Georgia Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and appendices’’ for ‘‘Georgia Supreme Court’s Uniform Rule for Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs’’ in the second and third sentences. See editor’s note for applicability.

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t15-ch12-24-(v13a)-2015-pdf.pdf, Volume V13A, 2015 edition, page 521; merge action: carried; file SHA-256 3ead04cf60ab.