Skip to content
Georgia Commons
Menu

Official Code of Georgia Annotated

Title 17. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · Chapter 10. SENTENCE AND PUNISHMENT · Article 2. DEATH PENALTY GENERALLY

17-10-36. Establishment of unified review procedure by Supreme Court; effect on habeas corpus.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

  1. (a)

    The Supreme Court of Georgia shall establish, by rules, a new unified review procedure to provide for the presentation to the sentencing court and to the Supreme Court of all possible challenges to the trial, conviction, sentence, and detention of defendants upon whom the sentence of death has been or may be imposed, which challenges before July 1, 1988, have been presented for review by the former unified review procedure under this subsection. Such new unified review procedure shall govern both pretrial and posttrial appellate review of death penalty cases.#

  2. (b)

    The Supreme Court shall establish, by rules, a series of check lists to be utilized by the trial court, the prosecuting attorney, and defense counsel prior to, during, and after the trial of cases in which the death penalty is sought to make certain that all possible matters which could be raised in defense have been considered by the defendant and defense counsel and either asserted in a timely and correct manner or waived in accordance with applicable legal requirements, so that, for purposes of any pretrial review and the trial and posttrial review, the record and transcript of proceedings will be complete for a review by the sentencing court and the Supreme Court of all possible challenges to the trial, conviction, sentence, and detention of the defendant.#

  3. (c)

    Nothing in this Code section or in the rules of the Supreme Court shall limit or restrict the grounds of review or suspend the rights or remedies available through the procedures governing the writ of habeas corpus.#

  4. (d)

    The procedures governing the writ of habeas corpus may be employed to assert rights or seek remedies if the procedures established in the rules of the Supreme Court as applied to the petitioner are inadequate or ineffective in any constitutional sense.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Code 1933, § 27-2538, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 390, § 1; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1437, § 5.

Code Commission notes

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1988, a comma was inserted following ‘‘July 1, 1988’’ in subsection (a) and a comma was deleted following ‘‘death penalty is sought’’ near the beginning of subsection (b).

Cross references

Habeas corpus generally, T. 9, C. 14.

Law reviews

For article, ‘‘A Study of the Unified Appeal Procedure in Georgia,’’ see 23 Ga. L. Rev. 185 (1988). For survey article on death penalty law, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 105 (2008).

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t17-(v15)-2020-pdf.pdf, Volume V15, 2020 edition, pages 1259 to 1260; merge action: carried; file SHA-256 0b0d45f9c609.