2-13-9. When commercial feed deemed misbranded.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

A commercial feed shall be deemed to be misbranded:
(1)
If its labeling is false or misleading in any particular;#
(2)
If it is distributed under the name of another commercial feed;#
(3)
If it is not labeled as required in Code Section 2-13-8;#
(4)
If it purports to be or is represented as a commercial feed or if it purports to contain or is represented as containing a commercial feed ingredient, unless such commercial feed or feed ingredient conforms to the definition, if any, prescribed by regulation by the Commissioner; or#
(5)
If any word, statement, or other information required by or under the authority of this chapter to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Code 1933, § 42-205, enacted by Ga. L. 1972, p. 10, § 1.

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t1-t2-t3-(v3)-2019-pdf.pdf, Volume V3, 2019 edition, pages 576 to 577; merge action: carried; file SHA-256 206dab95f27a.

Ask about this section

The answer is drawn from this section and, when they fit, the other sections of its chapter. It quotes the text and names the section for each claim. Not legal advice.