24-3-3. Contemporaneous writings explaining each other; parol evidence explaining ambiguities.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

(a)
All contemporaneous writings shall be admissible to explain each other.#
(b)
Parol evidence shall be admissible to explain all ambiguities, both latent and patent.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Code 1981, § 24-3-3, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.

Law reviews

For article, “Supplementing Written Agreements: Restating the Parol Evidence Rule in Terms of Credibility and Relative Fault,” see 34 Emory L.J. 93 (1985).

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t24-ch1-7-(v20)-2023-pdf.pdf, Volume V20, 2023 edition, page 77; merge action: annotated; file SHA-256 f2f9d1712dd4.

Ask about this section

The answer is drawn from this section and, when they fit, the other sections of its chapter. It quotes the text and names the section for each claim. Not legal advice.