Official Code of Georgia Annotated

Title 33. INSURANCE · Chapter 5. REGULATION OF UNAUTHORIZED INSURERS · Article 2. SURPLUS LINE INSURANCE · Part 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

33-5-34. Venue of actions against unauthorized insurers issuing surplus line policies; service of process; filing of pleading by insurer.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

(a)
An action shall be brought against any unauthorized insurer under any contract issued by it as a surplus line contract pursuant to this chapter in the superior court of the county in which the cause of action arose.#
(b)
Every unauthorized insurer issuing or delivering a surplus line policy through a surplus line broker in this state shall be deemed thereby to have appointed the Commissioner as its attorney for acceptance of service of all legal process issued in this state in any action or proceeding arising out of the policy, and service of process upon the Commissioner shall be lawful personal service upon the insurer.#
(c)
Each surplus line policy shall contain a provision stating the substance of subsection (b) of this Code section and designating the person to whom the Commissioner shall mail process as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section.#
(d)
Duplicate copies of legal process against the insurers shall be served upon the Commissioner and at time of service the plaintiff shall pay a fee in an amount as provided in Code Section 33-8-1, taxable as costs in the action. The Commissioner shall immediately mail one copy of the process so served to the person designated by the insurer in the policy for the purpose, by registered or certified mail or statutory overnight delivery with return receipt requested.#
(e)
The insurer shall have 30 days after the date of mailing within which to plead, answer, or otherwise defend the action.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Code 1933, § 56-626, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 1399, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2725, § 10; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 3.

Editor's notes

Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 16, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that the amendment to this Code section by Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 3, was applicable with respect to notices delivered on or after July 1, 2000.

Cross references

Venue generally, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II and § 9-10-30 et seq. Venue of actions against insurance companies generally, § 33-4-1.

Law reviews

For comment on McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 199, 2 L. Ed. 2d 223 (1957), holding that for a state to assert jurisdiction over a foreign insurance company it is sufficient for due process purposes if the contract on which the case is based has a substantial connection with that state, see 21 Ga. B.J. 113 (1958).

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t33-ch1-22-(v24)-2020-pdf.pdf, Volume V24, 2020 edition, page 219; merge action: carried; file SHA-256 4ecec175d949.

Ask about this section

The answer is drawn from this section and, when they fit, the other sections of its chapter. It quotes the text and names the section for each claim. Not legal advice.