44-6-24. Estates tail abolished; effect of limitations which would create estate tail by implication.

Active

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

(a)
Estates tail are prohibited and abolished and the law shall not presume or imply such an estate. Gifts or grants to a person and the heirs of his body, to his male heirs or female heirs, to his heirs by a particular person, to his children, or to his issue shall convey an absolute fee.#
(b)
Limitations which, by the English rules of construction, would create an estate tail by implication shall give a life estate to the first taker and with remainder over in fee to his children and their descendants, as provided in Code Section 44-6-23, and, if none is living at the time of his death, with remainder over in fee to the beneficiaries intended by the maker of the instrument.#

The notes below are printed with the section but are not enacted law (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). They are shown apart from the text.

History

Laws 1799, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 167; Laws 1821, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 169; Code 1863, § 2230; Code 1868, § 2224; Code 1873, § 2250; Code 1882, § 2250; Civil Code 1895, § 3085; Civil Code 1910, § 3661; Code 1933, § 85-505; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 44.

Law reviews

For article, ‘‘Estates Tail in Georgia,’’ see 13 Ga. B.J. 27 (1950). For article surveying real property law, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 255 (1982). For comment on Brooks v. Williams, 227 Ga. 59, 178 S.E.2d 880 (1970), see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 399 (1972).

Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).

Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Text read from t44-ch1-7-(v31)-2010-pdf.pdf, Volume V31, 2010 edition, pages 615 to 616; merge action: carried; file SHA-256 490191d3dc54.

Ask about this section

The answer is drawn from this section and, when they fit, the other sections of its chapter. It quotes the text and names the section for each claim. Not legal advice.