Official Code of Georgia Annotated
Title 51. TORTS · Chapter 7. FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION · Article 4. DETENTION OR ARREST ON SUSPICION OF SHOPLIFTING, THEFT, OR FILM PIRACY
51-7-60. Preclusion of recovery for detention of person suspected of theft under certain circumstances.
Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.
Whenever the owner or operator of a retail establishment as defined in Code Section 16-7-2 or a food service establishment as defined in Code Section 26-2-370 or any agent or employee thereof detains or causes to be detained any person pursuant to Code Section 17-4-80 and any person who detains or causes to be detained a person while acting pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 3 of Title 16 wherein the person so detained brings an action for false arrest or false imprisonment against such owner, operator, agent, employee, or person, no recovery shall be had by the plaintiff in such action when it is established by competent evidence:
- (1)
That the plaintiff had so conducted himself or herself or behaved in such manner as to cause a person of reasonable prudence to believe that the plaintiff, at or immediately prior to the time of the detention, was committing an:#
- (2)
That the manner of the detention and the length of time during which such plaintiff was detained was under all the circumstances reasonable.#
History
Ga. L. 1958, p. 693, § 1; Ga. L. 2014, p. 404, § 2-4/SB 382; Ga. L. 2021, p. 625, § 7/HB 479.
Amendments
The 2021 amendment, effective May 10, 2021, substituted the present provisions of the introductory paragraph for the former provisions, which read: “Whenever the owner or operator of a mercantile establishment or any agent or employee of the owner or operator detains, arrests, or causes to be detained or arrested any person reasonably thought to be engaged in shoplifting or refund fraud and, as a result of the detention or arrest, the person so detained or arrested brings an action for false arrest or false imprisonment against the owner, operator, agent, or employee, no recovery shall be had by the plaintiff in such action where it is established by competent evidence:”, substituted the present provisions of paragraph (1) for the former provisions, which read: “That the plaintiff had so conducted himself or herself or behaved in such manner as to cause a person of reasonable prudence to believe that the plaintiff, at or immediately prior to the time of the detention or arrest, was committing the offense of shoplifting, as defined by Code Section 16-8-14, or refund fraud as defined in Code Section 16-8-14; or”, and deleted “or arrest” following “detention” in paragraph (2). See Editor’s note for applicability.
Editor's notes
Ga. L. 2021, p. 625, § 8/HB479, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that: “This Act shall not apply to rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this Act.” This Act became effective May 10, 2021.
Law reviews
For note, “Publicly Funded Private Security: A Critical Examination of Georgia Law Pertaining to the Private Employment of Off-Duty Police Officers,” see 51 Ga. L. Rev. 879 (2017). For article, “HB 479: Repeal of Georgia’s Citizen’s Arrest Law,” see 38 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 25 (2021).
Read the official page (the state's PDF, opened at the page this text was read from).
Current through: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.
Text read from t51-(v39)-pdf.pdf, Volume V39, 2017 edition, 2025 supplement, pages 71 to 72; merge action: replaced; file SHA-256 9104a04c683d.