Amend. XIV. Equal Protection and Other Rights

Section II of this amendment supersedes the first sentence of U.S. Const., art. I, sec. II, para. III. Section III of this amendment modifies U.S. Const., art. I, secs. II and III, U.S. Const., art. II, sec. I, and U.S. Const., art. VI, by disqualifying from office those who fail to honor an oath of office. Section IV of this amendment modifies U.S. Const., art. I, sec. VIII, para. I, by forbidding the assumption and payment of certain debts incurred by national or state governments.

Due process rights, U.S. Const., amend. 5 and Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. I. Privileges and immunities for all citizens, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. VII, and §§ 1-2-9, 1-2-10.

For note discussing taxation of shares of stock, see 1 Ga. L. Rev. No. 2, p. 41 (1927). For comment on Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 58 S. Ct. 630, 82 L. Ed. 917 (1938), holding acquittal on criminal charge of tax evasion does not bar remedial civil action for fraudulent deduction arising out of same facts, see 1 Ga. B.J. 48 (1939). For comment on Hague v. Committee for Indus. Organization, 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423 (1939), holding unconstitutional ordinances denying permission to hold meetings and distribute pamphlets to labor organizers, see 2 Ga. B.J. 61 (1939). For article discussing unanimity of jurors, see 2 Ga. B.J. 13 (1940). For comment on Herbert v. State, 60 Ga. App. 633, 4 S.E.2d 843 (1939), see 2 Ga. B.J. 55 (1940). For comment on Williamson v. Housing Auth., 186 Ga. 673, 199 S.E. 43 (1938); Barber v. Housing Auth., 189 Ga. 155, 5 S.E.2d 425 (1939); Hogg v. Housing Auth., 189 Ga. 164, 5 S.E.2d 431 (1939), see 2 Ga. B.J. 65 (1940). For comment on Minersville School Dist. v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586, 60 S. Ct. 1010, 84 L. Ed. 1375 (1940), holding unconstitutional school regulation mandating flag salute, see 2 Ga. B.J. 66 (1940). For comment on Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 60 S. Ct. 900, 84 L. Ed. 1129 (1940), holding power of public official to determine what is a religious cause is unconstitutional infringement upon religious liberty, see 2 Ga. B.J. 68 (1940). For comment concerning indirect use of illegally seized evidence, in light of Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338, 60 S. Ct. 266, 84 L. Ed. 307 (1939), see 2 Ga. B.J. 70 (1940). For comment on Minersville School Dist. v. Gobitis, 108 F.2d 683 (3rd Cir. 1939), holding unconstitutional compulsory flag-salute regulation in school, see 2 Ga. B.J. 74 (1940). For comment on Schneider v. New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147, 60 S. Ct. 146, 84 L. Ed. 155 (1939), holding unconstitutional municipal ordinances prohibiting distribution of handbills in public places, see 2 Ga. B.J. 76 (1940). For comment criticizing McIntyre v. State, 190 Ga. 872, 11 S.E.2d 5 (1940), permitting admission of illegally seized evidence, see 3 Ga. B.J. 53 (1941). For comment on Bridges v. California, 314 U.S. 252, 62 S. Ct. 190, 86 L. Ed. 192 (1941), holding free speech and press guarantees extend to publication concerning judicial proceedings pending in court, see 4 Ga. B.J. 63 (1942). For comment discussing right to counsel for indigent defendants, in light of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S. Ct. 1252, 86 L. Ed. 1595 (1942), see 5 Ga. B.J. 51 (1942). For comment regarding denial of due process through statute involving administration of estate of absentee minor, in light of Payne v. Home Sav. Bank, 193 Ga. 406, 18 S.E.2d 770 (1942), see 5 Ga. B.J. 62 (1943). For comment as to constitutional permissibility of state and municipal ordinances requiring permit to distribute religious literature, in light of Jamison v. Texas, 318 U.S. 413, 63 S. Ct. 669, 87 L. Ed. 869 (1943), see 5 Ga. B.J. 70 (1943). For comment on West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 63 S. Ct. 1178, 87 L. Ed. 1628 (1943), holding unconstitutional state law requiring flag salute by students, see 6 Ga. B.J. 249 (1944). For comment on Taylor v. Mississippi, 319 U.S. 583, 63 S. Ct. 1200, 87 L. Ed. 1600 (1943), holding statute criminalizing indoctrination of creed, theory, or principles creating refusal to salute United States flag denies liberty guaranteed by this amendment, see 6 Ga. B.J. 250 (1944). For comment on United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694, 64 S. Ct. 1248, 88 L. Ed. 1542 (1944), holding privilege against self-incrimination cannot be claimed for refusal to produce union records specifically designated in subpoena, see 7 Ga. B.J. 247 (1944). For comment regarding due process right to counsel for indigent defendant charged with felony, in light of Williams v. Kaiser, 323 U.S. 471, 65 S. Ct. 363, 89 L. Ed. 398 (1945), see 7 Ga. B.J. 484 (1945). For article, “Religious Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment,” see 9 Ga. B.J. 141 (1946). For comment discussing taxation of property beyond state jurisdiction by means of ad valorem tax on accounts receivable of foreign corporation from sales in Georgia, in light of Parke, Davis & Co. v. Atlanta, 200 Ga. 296, 36 S.E.2d 773 (1946), see 8 Ga. B.J. 425 (1946). For article criticizing operation of U.S. Const., amend. 1, in relation to right of privacy, see 10 Ga. B.J. 53 (1947). For comment on Turman v. Duckworth, 68 F. Supp. 744 (N.D. Ga.), appeal dismissed, 329 U.S. 675, 67 S. Ct. 21, 91 L. Ed. 596, rehearing denied, 329 U.S. 829, 67 S. Ct. 296, 91 L. Ed. 704 (1946), see 9 Ga. B.J. 335 (1947). For comment on United Pub. Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S. Ct. 556, 91 L. Ed. 754 (1946), upholding constitutionality of Hatch Act curbing political activity of state and federal employees, see 9 Ga. B.J. 459 (1947). For comment on Everson v. Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 67 S. Ct. 504, 91 L. Ed. 711 (1947), upholding constitutionality of public transportation to children attending parochial schools, see 9 Ga. B.J. 461 (1947). For comment on Harris v. United States, 331 U.S. 145, 67 S. Ct. 1098, 91 L. Ed. 399 (1947), upholding constitutionality of evidence seized during search incident to arrest, see 10 Ga. B.J. 120 (1947). For article discussing rights of Negroes under this amendment, see 10 Ga. B.J. 346 (1948). For article discussing fishing rights along maritime belt of the United States, in light of Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S. 385, 68 S. Ct. 1157, 92 L. Ed. 1460 (1948), see 11 Ga. B.J. 191 (1948). For article discussing jury service for women, see 11 Ga. B.J. 196 (1948). For comment on Fay v. New York, 329 U.S. 697, 67 S. Ct. 92, 91 L. Ed. 609 (1947), upholding constitutionality of New York “blue ribbon” jury, see 10 Ga. B.J. 386 (1948). For comment on Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 68 S. Ct. 367, 92 L. Ed. 436 (1948), holding when the right of privacy must yield to right of search is a matter for judicial officer, not policeman, see 10 Ga. B.J. 498 (1948). For comment on McCollum v. Board of Educ., 333 U.S. 203, 68 S. Ct. 461, 92 L. Ed. 649 (1948), holding constitutionally impermissible religious education classes held during school hours, see 10 Ga. B.J. 499 (1948). For comment on Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S. Ct. 836, 92 L. Ed. 1161 (1948), holding state court enforcement of restrictive covenants based on race is state action, see 11 Ga. B.J. 89 (1948). For comment on Local 309, United Furn. Workers v. Gates, 75 F. Supp. 620 (1948), holding presence of state police officers at union meeting denies workers’ freedoms of speech and assembly, see 11 Ga. B.J. 233 (1948). For comment on McDonald v. United States, 166 F.2d 957 (D.C. Cir. 1948), holding act of looking through transom without search warrant and observing that which is not hidden is not a search, see 11 Ga. B.J. 241 (1948). For comment on Gholson v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. App. 82, 212 S.W.2d 537 (1948), holding judge must determine whether indigent intelligently and voluntarily waives right to counsel, see 11 Ga. B.J. 251 (1948). For comment on Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 335 U.S. 437, 69 S. Ct. 184, 93 L. Ed. 127 (1948), holding due process requires court to offer provision of counsel before permitting accused to plead guilty, see 11 Ga. B.J. 364 (1948). For comment on Jones v. Kentucky, 97 F.2d 335 (6th Cir. 1938), holding due process requires state to afford corrective process where falsity of perjured testimony upon which conviction is obtained is discovered after the conviction, see 11 Ga. B.J. 44 (1949). For comment on Frazier v. United States, 335 U.S. 497, 69 S. Ct. 201, 93 L. Ed. 187 (1948), holding defendant’s choice to eliminate nongovernment employees from jury panel cannot be repudiated as petitioner was given fair and lawfully selected panel, see 11 Ga. B.J. 366 (1949). For comment discussing right to distribute religious material in apartment house, in light of Hall v. Commonwealth, 188 Va. 72, 49 S.E.2d 369 (1948), see 11 Ga. B.J. 369 (1949). For comment discussing right of parents to teach and instruct children, in light of Rice v. Commonwealth, 188 Va. 224, 49 S.E.2d 342 (1948), see 11 Ga. B.J. 376 (1949). For comment discussing discrimination against Negro voters manifested in voter registration requirements, in light of Davis v. Schnell, 81 F. Supp. 872 (S.D. Ala.), aff’d without opinion, 336 U.S. 933, 69 S. Ct. 749, 93 L. Ed. 1093 (1949), see 12 Ga. B.J. 94 (1949). For comment on Burke v. State, 205 Ga. 656, 54 S.E.2d 350 (1949), see 12 Ga. B.J. 212 (1949). For comment on Crumb v. State, 205 Ga. 547, 54 S.E.2d 639 (1949), see 12 Ga. B.J. 215 (1949). For comment on Lawson v. United States, 176 F.2d 49 (D.C. Cir. 1949), holding rights of privacy and free association permitted script writers to refuse answers to H.U.A.C. questions on Communist party affiliations, see 12 Ga. B.J. 222 (1949). For article detailing historical use of injunctive law enforcement in equity including discussion of disadvantages of criminal injunctions, see 1 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (1949). For comment discussing permissible scope of statutes defining unlawful speech, in light of Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 69 S. Ct. 894, 93 L. Ed. 1131 (1949), see 1 Mercer L. Rev. 114 (1949). For article discussing constitutionality of restrictive covenants, see 12 Ga. B.J. 277 (1950). For comment discussing cruel and unusual punishment and scope of review of proceedings through writ of habeas corpus of convict escaped from chain gang, in light of Dye v. Johnson, 338 U.S. 864, 70 S. Ct. 146, 94 L. Ed. 530 (1949), see 12 Ga. B.J. 356 (1950). For comment discussing damages for breach of restrictive covenants when such covenants not specifically enforceable, in light of Weiss v. Leaon, 225 S.W.2d 127 (Mo. 1949), see 12 Ga. B.J. 498 (1950). For comment on McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, 94 L. Ed. 1149 (1950), holding unconstitutional racial discrimination in state-supported graduate school, see 13 Ga. B.J. 88 (1950). For comment discussing constitutionality of local motion picture censorship laws, in light of RD-DR Corp. & Film Classics, Inc. v. Smith, 183 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1950), see 13 Ga. B.J. 248 (1950). For comment on Traveler’s Health Ass’n v. Virginia, 339 U.S. 643, 70 S. Ct. 927, 94 L. Ed. 1154 (1950), holding due process is satisfied by Virginia provisions subjecting foreign mail-order insurance business to service of process, see 13 Ga. B.J. 255 (1950). For article, “Interstate Extradition and State Sovereignty,” see 1 Mercer L. Rev. 147 (1950). For comment discussing appeal by state after acquittal, in light of State v. Evjue, 254 Wis. 581, 37 N.W.2d 50 (1949), see 1 Mercer L. Rev. 306 (1950). For comment as to state authority to regulate election ballots, in light of Morrison v. Lamarre, 75 R.I. 176, 65 A.2d 217 (1949), see 1 Mercer L. Rev. 311 (1950). For comment discussing racial segregation in graduate schools, in light of Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 70 S. Ct. 848, 94 L. Ed. 1114 (1950), and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Educ., 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, 94 L. Ed. 1149 (1950), see 2 Mercer L. Rev. 272 (1950). For comment criticizing South v. Peters, 339 U.S. 276, 70 S. Ct. 641, 94 L. Ed. 834 (1950) denying federal jurisdiction in apportionment case under the county unit system (Ga. L. 1917, p. 183), see 2 Mercer L. Rev. 274 (1950). For comment on South v. Peters, 339 U.S. 276, 70 S. Ct. 641, 94 L. Ed. 834 (1950) denying federal jurisdiction in case involving apportionment, see 2 Mercer L. Rev. 275 (1950). For article suggesting county unit system discriminates against classes of voters in violation of equal protection clause, see 14 Ga. B.J. 28 (1951). For article discussing conflict between free speech guarantees and municipal ordinances protecting public tranquility, see 14 Ga. B.J. 191 (1951). For comment on Azar v. Thomas, 206 Ga. 588, 57 S.E.2d 821 (1950), holding foreign decree of divorce may be collaterally attacked on grounds of fraud in its procurement and lack of jurisdiction, see 13 Ga. B.J. 334 (1951). For comment discussing constitutionality of segregation in state-supported law school, in light of Epps v. Carmichael, 93 F. Supp. 327 (M.D.N.C. 1950), see 13 Ga. B.J. 357 (1951). For comment on Doremus v. Board of Educ., 5 N.J. 435, 75 A.2d 880 (1950), holding constitutional statutes requiring Bible reading without comment in public school classrooms, see 13 Ga. B.J. 360 (1951). For comment discussing clear and present danger test, in light of United States v. Dennis, 183 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1950), see 13 Ga. B.J. 361 (1951). For comment on Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159, 71 S. Ct. 223, 95 L. Ed. 170 (1950), holding fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination extends to refusal to answer grand jury questions regarding Communist party, see 13 Ga. B.J. 483 (1951). For comment discussing state regulation of interstate natural gas pipelines, in light of Cities Serv. Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co., 340 U.S. 179, 71 S. Ct. 215, 95 L. Ed. 190 (1950), see 13 Ga. B.J. 488 (1951). For comment on Mairs v. Peters, 52 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1951), holding party loyalty oath is reasonable regulation based on legislative power to set standards for candidates, see 14 Ga. B.J. 234 (1951). For comment concerning discriminatory selection of grand jury members, in light of Shepherd v. Florida, 341 U.S. 50, 71 S. Ct. 549, 95 L. Ed. 740 (1951), see 14 Ga. B.J. 256 (1951). For comment on Breard v. City of Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622, 71 S. Ct. 920, 95 L. Ed. 1233 (1951), upholding constitutionality of “Green River” ordinances, see 14 Ga. B.J. 258 (1951). For comment on United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36, 72 S. Ct. 97, 96 L. Ed. 48 (1951), see 14 Ga. B.J. 486 (1952). For comment on Phillups v. Naff, 332 Mich. 389, 52 N.W.2d 158 (1952), see 15 Ga. B.J. 71 (1952). For comment on Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 72 S. Ct. 205, 96 L. Ed. 183 (1952), see 15 Ga. B.J. 86 (1952). For comment on Moore v. Draper, 57 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1952), holding a Florida statute which required the isolation of persons having tuberculosis to be a proper exercise of police power and not violative of due process, see 15 Ga. B.J. 215 (1952). For comment, “Dual Nationals’ Duties of Allegiance,” discussing the legal effect of dual nationality, see 15 Ga. B.J. 239 (1952). For article, “Free Speech and the Interest in Local Law and Order,” see 1 J. of Pub. L. 41 (1952). For comment discussing the constitutional issues involved in releasing students from public schools for periodic religious training, in light of Zorach v. Clauson, 303 N.Y. 161, 100 N.E.2d 463 (1951), aff’d, 343 U.S. 306, 72 S. Ct. 679, 96 L. Ed. 954 (1952), see 1 J. of Pub. L. 212 (1952). For comment discussing the constitutional conflicts involved where outside events, especially press coverage, tend to influence a defendant’s opportunity for a fair trial, in light of Shepherd v. Florida, 341 U.S. 50, 71 S. Ct. 549, 95 L. Ed. 40 (1951), see 1 J. of Pub. L. 217 (1952). For comment, “State Regulation of the Hatemonger,” focusing on Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 72 S. Ct. 725, 96 L. Ed. 919 (1952), see 1 J. of Pub. L. 519 (1952). For comment on Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Missouri, 342 U.S. 421, 72 S. Ct. 405, 96 L. Ed. 343 (1952), holding state-imposed pay-for-voting system constitutional, see 4 Mercer L. Rev. 209 (1952). For comment on Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306, 72 S. Ct. 679, 96 L. Ed. 954 (1952), see 15 Ga. B.J. 363 (1953). For comment on Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 72 S. Ct. 725, 96 L. Ed. 919 (1952), see 15 Ga. B.J. 366 (1953). For comment on Fowler v. Rhode Island, 345 U.S. 67, 73 S. Ct. 526, 97 L. Ed. 828 (1953), see 16 Ga. B.J. 95 (1953). For comment on Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249, 73 S. Ct. 1031, 97 L. Ed. 1586 (1953), holding that damages for breach of racially restrictive covenant cannot be maintained as such action by the court is state action within the meaning of this amendment, see 16 Ga. B.J. 229 (1953). For comment on Kansas City v. Williams, 205 F.2d 47 (8th Cir. 1953), holding the exclusion of blacks from the use of a deluxe swimming pool located in a public park constitutes unequal protection and is violative of this amendment, see 16 Ga. B.J. 230 (1953). For article, “Constitutionality of Economic Regulations,” see 2 J. of Pub. L. 98 (1953). For note, “Racial Restrictive Covenants: Damages for Breach,” see 2 J. of Pub. L. 466 (1953). For comment on Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249, 73 S. Ct. 1031, 97 L. Ed. 1586 (1953), holding damage award by state court for breach of restrictive covenant against sale of realty to nonwhites an equal protection violation, see 5 Mercer L. Rev. 206 (1953). For comment on discriminatory jury selection, in light of Avery v. State of Georgia, 345 U.S. 559, 73 S. Ct. 891, 97 L. Ed. 1244 (1953), see 5 Mercer L. Rev. 207 (1953). For article, “Segregation in the Public Schools of Georgia,” see 16 Ga. B.J. 417 (1954). For comment on Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249, 73 S. Ct. 1031, 97 L. Ed. 1586 (1953), denying damages for breach of racially restrictive covenant, see 16 Ga. B.J. 355 (1954). For article, “Segregation in the Public Schools,” see 3 J. of Pub. L. 5 (1954). For article, “The School Segregation Decision: A Legal Analysis,” see 3 J. of Pub. L. 83 (1954). For note discussing the use of eminent domain powers in slum clearance and owners’ rights under U.S. Const., amend. 5 and this amendment, see 3 J. of Pub. L. 261 (1954). For comment on racially restrictive covenants, in light of Rice v. Sioux City Mem. Park Cem., 245 Iowa 147, 60 N.W.2d 110 (1953), see 3 J. of Pub. L. 272 (1954). For article, “Compulsory Legal Segregation in the Public Schools, with Special Reference to Georgia,” see 5 Mercer L. Rev. 211 (1954). For comment discussing motion picture censorship, in light of Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 346 U.S. 587, 74 S. Ct. 286, 98 L. Ed. 329 (1954), see 5 Mercer L. Rev. 325 (1954). For comment on Massey v. Moore, 348 U.S. 105, 75 S. Ct. 145, 99 L. Ed. 135 (1954), holding that conviction of an insane man without benefit of counsel and unable to defend himself is violative of due process, see 17 Ga. B.J. 525 (1955). For comment on Watson v. Employer’s Liab. Assurance Corp., 348 U.S. 66, 75 S. Ct. 166, 99 L. Ed. 74 (1954), holding that a statute allowing a direct action by the policy holder against the insurer contrary to the terms of the contract and requiring the consent of the insurer to such action as a prerequisite of doing business in the state was not violative of the Constitution, see 17 Ga. B.J. 529 (1955). For comment on Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 75 S. Ct. 1, 99 L. Ed. 4 (1954), reversing conviction as a habitual criminal of petitioner who was denied aid of counsel, see 17 Ga. B.J. 401 (1955). For comment on United States v. Nesmith, 121 F. Supp. 758 (D.D.C. 1954), regarding admissibility of chemical tests of body fluids where U.S. Const., Amends. 4 and 5 and this amendment objections are made, see 4 J. of Pub. L. 202 (1955). For comment on Grandville-Smith v. Grandville-Smith, 349 U.S. 1, 75 S. Ct. 553, 99 L. Ed. 773 (1955), analyzing due process aspects of divorce jurisdiction statutes and full faith and credit problems with divorce decrees, see 4 J. of Pub. L. 206 (1955). For comment on Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 75 S. Ct. 1, 99 L. Ed. 4 (1954), regarding extension of due process to include right to employ counsel in trial under habitual criminal statute, see 4 J. of Pub. L. 212 (1955). For article, “School Systems, Segregation and the Supreme Court,” see 6 Mercer L. Rev. 189 (1955). For comment on Dawson v. Mayor of Baltimore, 23 U.S.L. Week 2057 (4th Cir. March 14, 1955) abolishing “Separate but Equal” doctrine as applied to racial segregation in public beach and bath house facilities, see 6 Mercer L. Rev. 343 (1955). For comment on Williams v. Hirsch, 211 Ga. 534, 87 S.E.2d 70 (1955), holding unfair Cigarette Sales Act of 1949 (Ga. L. 1949, p. 695) unconstitutional, see 6 Mercer L. Rev. 352 (1955). For comment on Beard v. United States, 222 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1955), wherein the refusal of defendant to produce public records was held to raise an inference of criminality and such inference did not violate privilege against self-incrimination, see 7 Mercer L. Rev. 233 (1955). For comment on Fleming v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co., 224 F.2d 752 (4th Cir. 1955), holding that defendant corporation in requiring plaintiff to change bus seats under color of state law denied plaintiff her constitutional rights as the separate but equal doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S. Ct. 1138, 41 L. Ed. 256 (1896) can no longer be regarded as a correct statement of law, see 18 Ga. B.J. 356 (1956). For article, “The Discriminatory Effect of Multiple State Taxation of Interstate Carriers,” see 5 J. of Pub. L. 327 (1956). For comment, “Doing Business for Purposes of State Taxation of Foreign Corporations,” focusing on Minnesota v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co., CCH State Tax Reports 16-001 (Hennepin County Dist. Court, October, 1955), see 5 J. of Pub. L. 263 (1956). For article, “Crime Comic Books: Government Control and Their Impact on Juvenile Conduct,” see 7 Mercer L. Rev. 331 (1956). For comment criticizing Gainer v. School Bd., 135 F. Supp. 559 (M.D. Ala. 1955), refusing to enforce injunction against school board for discriminatory salary practices on U.S. Const., amend. 11 grounds, see 7 Mercer L. Rev. 387 (1956). For article opposing Supreme Court’s interpreting U.S. Const., amend. 5, and this amendment to forbid segregation of the races as judicial usurpation of the legislative power, see 19 Ga. B.J. 321 (1957). For article, “Jury Trials in Contempt Cases,” see 20 Ga. B.J. 297 (1957). For article arguing against constitutional justification for the sending of federal troops to Little Rock, Arkansas and the federalization of Arkansas troops, see 20 Ga. B.J. 325 (1957). For comment on Dyer v. Abe, 138 F. Supp. 220 (D. Hawaii 1956), holding that the failure of the state Legislature to reapportion in accordance with statutory or constitutional requirements is a denial of equal protection and due process, see 19 Ga. B.J. 368 (1957). For comment on Hill v. Balkcom, 213 Ga. 58, 96 S.E.2d 589 (1957), holding that where court appointed counsel in a criminal case is a member of the bar in good standing, which is prima facie evidence of his competency as an attorney, and serves his client in good faith and with loyalty, the requirements of due process are met, see 19 Ga. B.J. 519 (1957). For comment discussing the effect of the decision in Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 74 S. Ct. 686, 98 L. Ed. 873, 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 (1954), on the separate but equal doctrine in areas other than public education, see 19 Ga. B.J. 540 (1957). For comment on Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432, 77 S. Ct. 408, 1 L. Ed. 2d 448 (1957), holding that this amendment does not extend the protection of the U.S. Const., Amends. 4 and 5 to criminal prosecutions in state cases, see 20 Ga. B.J. 126 (1957). For article, “Patterns of Social Legislation: Reflections on the Welfare State,” see 6 J. of Pub. L. 3 (1957). For article analyzing and criticizing aid to dependent children program and its constitutionality, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 25 (1957). For article, “Judicial Review in General Assistance,” see 6 J. of Pub. L. 100 (1957). For article, “The Law of the Land,” focusing on the role of the Supreme Court, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 444 (1957). For article discussing the impact of the Supreme Court’s holding in Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Educ., 333 U.S. 203, 67 S. Ct. 461, 92 L. Ed. 649 (1948), as to the use of public schools for religion classes, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 455 (1957). For comment on International Bhd. of Teamsters v. Vogt, Inc., 354 U.S. 284, 77 S. Ct. 1166, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1347 (1957) as to the constitutionality of enjoining picketing, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 534 (1957). For comment on Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 77 S. Ct. 1325, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1469 (1957), upholding the enjoining under a New York statute of distribution of certain obscene books, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 548 (1957). For comment on First Unitarian Church v. County of Los Angeles, 48 C.2d 419, 311 P.2d 508 (1957), upholding requirement of loyalty oath as prerequisite to tax exemption, see 6 J. of Pub. L. 555 (1957). For article surveying the law in Georgia on admissions, see 8 Mercer L. Rev. 252 (1957). For article criticizing United States v. Costello, 145 F. Supp. 892 (S.D.N.Y. 1956), holding the privilege against self-incrimination does not obtain in denaturalization proceedings due to the noncriminal nature of such proceedings, see 8 Mercer L. Rev. 368 (1957). For note, “Constitutionality of ‘Segregation by Indirection’ Through Sale or Lease of Public Recreational Facilities,” see 8 Mercer L. Rev. 355 (1957). For comment on Fikes v. Alabama, 25 U.S.L. Week (1957), as to effect of psychological weakness of prisoner on voluntariness of confession, see 8 Mercer L. Rev. 367 (1957). For comment discussing reasonableness in search and seizure of narcotics from accused’s body, in light of Blackford v. United States, 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957), see 9 Mercer L. Rev. 220 (1957). For article, “Due Process of Law Yester-day, Today and Tomorrow,” see 21 Ga. B.J. 193 (1958). For comment on Pennsylvania v. Board of Dirs., 353 U.S. 230, 77 S. Ct. 806, 1 L. Ed. 2d 792 (1957), holding that the Philadelphia Board of Directors of City Trusts was an agency of the state and their denial to nonwhite applicants of admission to a college pursuant to the trust creating the institution constitutes discrimination by the state and is violative of this amendment, see 20 Ga. B.J. 397 (1958). For comment on Ludley v. Board of Supervisors, 150 F. Supp. 900 (E.D. La. 1957), declaring that a statute requiring applicants to publicly financed institutions of higher learning obtain a certificate of eligibility and good moral character signed by their local superintendent of education and a statute forbidding teachers from performing acts to bring about integration in public schools or institutions of higher learning, together violated the equal protection clause of this amendment, and the obvious intent of the statute requiring the certificate of eligibility to discriminate against Negroes rendered it unconstitutional where standing alone as well, see 20 Ga. B.J. 400 (1958). For comment on Schware v. Board of Bar Exmrs., 353 U.S. 232, 77 S. Ct. 752, 1 L. Ed. 2d 796 (1957), holding that the petitioner was denied due process by the state’s refusal to allow him to qualify for the bar indicating that because of prior arrests and past membership in the Communist Party he had not shown “good moral character,” see 20 Ga. B.J. 406 (1958). For comment on Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U.S. 191, 77 S. Ct. 281, 1 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1957), holding that a confession rendered under pressure while in solitary confinement at a state penitentiary prior to arraignment was involuntary and its admission into evidence constituted a violation of due process under this amendment, see 20 Ga. B.J. 408 (1958). For comment on Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 77 S. Ct. 1203, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1311 (1957), reversing a contempt conviction where appellant refused to testify on grounds of U.S. Const., amend. 1, see 20 Ga. B.J. 411 (1958). For comment on McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 199, 2 L. Ed. 2d 223 (1957), holding that for a state to assert jurisdiction over a foreign insurance company it is sufficient for due process purposes if the contract on which the case is based has a substantial connection with that state, see 21 Ga. B.J. 113 (1958). For comment on Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560, 78 S. Ct. 844, 2 L. Ed. 2d 975 (1958), overturning a conviction for murder gained on the basis of a coerced confession, see 21 Ga. B.J. 116 (1958). For comment on Complete Auto Transit Co. v. Floyd, 249 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1957), holding that a statute which, if applied, would subject the defendant to double recovery of medical and funeral expenses was unconstitutional as against that defendant because it deprives the defendant of its property without due process of law, see 21 Ga. B.J. 244 (1958). For article, “Personal Rights, Property Rights and Due Process: A Comparison of Constitutional Protection in the Georgia Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court,” see 9 Mercer L. Rev. 253 (1958). For note, “The Posture of Former Jeopardy on Retrial,” see 9 Mercer L. Rev. 354 (1958). For comment on McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 199, 2 L. Ed. 2d 223 (1957) extending personal jurisdiction to nonresident life insurance company through expansion of “minimum contacts” doctrine, see 9 Mercer L. Rev. 362 (1958). For comment discussing right to counsel of indigent indicted for noncapital felony, in light of Cash v. Culver, 358 U.S. 633, 79 S. Ct. 432, 3 L. Ed. 2d 557 (1959), see 22 Ga. B.J. 111 (1959). For comment on Steinberg v. United States, 163 F. Supp. 590 (Ct. Cl. 1958), holding suspension of retirement pay for pleading U.S. Const., amend. 5 to be violation of due process, see 22 Ga. B.J. 114 (1959). For comment on Martinez v. State, 167 Tex. 97, 318 S.W.2d 66 (1958), holding suspension of attorney from state bar rendered him unqualified to afford representation envisioned by guarantees of U.S. Const., amend. 6, see 22 Ga. B.J. 239 (1959). For comment on Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225, 78 S. Ct. 240, 2 L. Ed. 2d 228 (1957), holding Criminal Registration Act violates due process, see 22 Ga. B.J. 272 (1959). For article, “The Right of Confrontation: Its History and Modern Dress,” see 8 J. of Pub. L. 381 (1959). For comment on the right to belong to a labor union, in light of Oliphant v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 262 F.2d 359 (6th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 935, 79 S. Ct. 648, 3 L. Ed. 2d 636 (1959), see 8 J. of Pub. L. 580 (1959). For article, “Interpreting the Georgia Constitution Today,” see 10 Mercer L. Rev. 219 (1959). For article, “The School Segregation Cases,” see 23 Ga. B.J. 9 (1960). For article suggesting basis for federally-imposed integration policies lies in the unconstitutional creation of this amendment, see 23 Ga. B.J. 228 (1960). For comment regarding right of witness in congressional contempt proceeding to refuse to testify under the U.S. Const., Amends. 1 and 5, in light of Barrenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109, 79 S. Ct. 1081, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1115 (1959), see 22 Ga. B.J. 404 (1960). For comment on Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S. Ct. 1173, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1217 (1959), holding knowing use of false testimony by state official to obtain conviction is denial of due process, see 22 Ga. B.J. 406 (1960). For comment on Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360, 79 S. Ct. 804, 3 L. Ed. 2d 877 (1959), holding housing inspection without warrant to be reasonable search, see 22 Ga. B.J. 410 (1960). For comment on Marshall v. United States, 360 U.S. 310, 79 S. Ct. 1171, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1250 (1959), holding exposure of jurors to newspaper articles regarding prior convictions when court refused to permit prosecutor to present such evidence was denial of due process, see 22 Ga. B.J. 413 (1960). For comment discussing reasonableness of warrantless search of automobile, in light of Patenotte v. United States, 266 F.2d 647 (5th Cir. 1959), see 22 Ga. B.J. 549 (1960). For comment discussing constitutionality of prior restraint of distribution of anonymous handbills, in light of California v. Talley, 172 Cal. App. 2d 797, 332 P.2d 447 (1958), see 23 Ga. B.J. 123 (1960). For comment on Hudson v. North Carolina, 363 U.S. 697, 80 S. Ct. 1314, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1500 (1960), holding unconstitutional denial of counsel to petitioner where guilty plea of codefendant placed him in prejudicial position, see 23 Ga. B.J. 265 (1960). For comment on Nelson v. County of Los Angeles, 362 U.S. 1, 80 S. Ct. 527, 4 L. Ed. 2d 494 (1959), holding due process not denied employees summarily dismissed for invocation of U.S. Const., Amends. 1 and 5, before congressional subcommittee, see 23 Ga. B.J. 267 (1960). For article discussing convergence of standards governing limits of state’s personal jurisdiction and applicability of state substantive law, see 9 J. of Pub. L. 282 (1960). For article, “The Length of the Long Arm,” see 9 J. of Pub. L. 293 (1960). For comment on Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 80 S. Ct. 1437, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1669 (1960), holding evidence illegally obtained by state officers is inadmissible in federal as well as state courts, see 23 Ga B.J. 383 (1961). For comment discussing admissibility of evidence obtained by search and seizure under administrative warrant, in light of Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 80 S. Ct. 683, 4 L. Ed. 2d 668 (1960), see 23 Ga. B.J. 400 (1961). For comment on Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, 216 Ga. 74, 114 S.E.2d 421 (1960), see 23 Ga. B.J. 406 (1961). For comment discussing Supreme Court treatment of political questions, in light of Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 81 S. Ct. 125, 5 L. Ed. 2d 110 (1960), see 23 Ga. B.J. 545 (1961). For comment on Times Film Corp. v. Chicago, 365 U.S. 43, 81 S. Ct. 391, 5 L. Ed. 2d 403 (1961), holding censorship standards set by state to prevent public display of obscenity do not constitute prior restraint, see 23 Ga. B.J. 554 (1961). For comment discussing constitutionality of state loyalty oaths, in light of Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 81 S. Ct. 247, 5 L. Ed. 2d 231 (1960), see 23 Ga. B.J. 556 (1961). For comment discussing exclusionary rule in state courts, in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961), see 24 Ga. B.J. 129 (1961). For comment discussing standing to object to unlawful search and seizure, in light of Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S. Ct. 725, 4 L. Ed. 2d 697 (1960), see 24 Ga. B.J. 131 (1961). For comment on Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 81 S. Ct. 679, 5 L. Ed. 2d 734 (1961), holding police use of “spike mike” violated prohibition against unlawful search and seizure, see 24 Ga. B.J. 135 (1961). For article, “Choice of Law and the Constitution,” see 10 J. of Pub. L. 289 (1961). For note discussing whether the imposition of liability for support of patients in state mental institutions upon their estates or relatives violates this amendment, see 12 Mercer L. Rev. 355 (1961). For note on constitutionality of former Georgia practice forbidding questioning of accused by his own attorney during unsworn statement, see 13 Mercer L. Rev. 265 (1961). For comment on Mapp v. Ohio, 365 U.S. 514, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 5 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1961), and the incorporation of the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures of U.S. Const., amend. 4 into this amendment, see 13 Mercer L. Rev. 275 (1961). For article discussing federalism under the Constitution, see 24 Ga. B.J. 352 (1962). For note discussing constitutionality of racially restrictive covenants in deeds, see 25 Ga. B.J. 232 (1962). For note discussing retroactive application of constitutional prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures, in light of Mapp v. Ohio, see 25 Ga. B.J. 238 (1962). For comment discussing constitutionality of legislation requiring employees to pay dues to railway union in order to maintain employment, in light of International Ass’n of Machinists v. Street, 367 U.S. 740, 81 S. Ct. 784, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1141 (1961), see 24 Ga. B.J. 432 (1962). For comment discussing application of exclusionary rule to state, in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961), see 24 Ga. B.J. 445 (1962). For comment on Pierce v. La Vallee, 293 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1961), holding black muslimism is religion within meaning of U.S. Const., amend. 1, see 24 Ga. B.J. 519 (1962). For comment on Cohen v. Hurley, 366 U.S. 117, 81 S. Ct. 954, 6 L. Ed. 2d 156 (1961), upholding constitutionality of disbarment by state court of attorney who refused to answer questions in judicial investigation pertaining to professional misconduct, see 24 Ga. B.J. 522 (1962). For comment on National Linen Serv. Corp. v. Thompson, 103 Ga. App. 786, 120 S.E.2d 779 (1961), see 24 Ga. B.J. 541 (1962). For comment on Wright v. State, 217 Ga. 453, 122 S.E.2d 738 (1961), see 25 Ga. B.J. 99 (1962). For article discussing concept of judicial neutrality in relation to the school desegregation cases, see 11 J. of Pub. L. 48 (1962). For note on statutory restrictions upon corporate ownership of real property, see 13 Mercer L. Rev. 410 (1962). For comment on Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, 82 S. Ct. 1261, 8 L. Ed. 2d 601 (1962) and the unconstitutionality of state composed prayer in a public school, see 14 Mercer L. Rev. 284 (1962). For article discussing the Georgia county unit case of 1963, Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 83 S. Ct. 801, 9 L. Ed. 2d 821 (1963), see 25 Ga. B.J. 367 (1963). For note criticizing court reliance on “wall of separation” doctrine in interpreting “no establishment” clause, see 25 Ga. B.J. 319 (1963). For note discussing whipping as cruel and unusual punishment, see 26 Ga. B.J. 216 (1963). For comment on Hempton v. Jacksonville, 304 F.2d 320 (5th Cir. 1962), holding conveyance of public facilities to private individuals with inclusion of reversionary clause restricting use of facilities to white patrons makes purchasers thereof agents of state, and is state action, see 25 Ga. B.J. 333 (1963). For comment on Gallegos v. Colorado, 370 U.S. 49, 82 S. Ct. 1209, 81 L. Ed. 2d 325 (1962), holding coerced confession denies accused of due process, see 25 Ga. B.J. 415 (1963). For comment on Anderson v. Martin, 206 F. Supp. 700 (D. La. 1962), holding designation of race of candidates on ballot does not violate constitutional rights, see 25 Ga. B.J. 416 (1963). For comment discussing judicial establishment of standards for reapportioning state senate districts, in light of Scholle v. Hare, 367 Mich. 176, 116 N.W.2d 350 (1962), see 25 Ga. B.J. 431 (1963). For comment on Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, 93 A.L.R.2d 733 (1963), holding accused has right to counsel in all felony cases regardless of indigency, see 26 Ga. B.J. 96 (1963). For comment on Wright v. State, 373 U.S. 284, 83 S. Ct. 1240, 10 L. Ed. 2d 349 (1963), see 26 Ga. B.J. 99 (1963). For comment on Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, 93 A.L.R.2d 733 (1963), holding right to counsel is extended to noncapital felonies in the state courts, see 26 Ga. B.J. 186 (1963). For article, “The Supreme Court and State Coerced Confessions,” see 12 J. of Pub. L. 53 (1963). For article, “A Stream Polluted at Its Source: The Georgia County Unit System,” see 12 J. of Pub. L. 86 (1963). For note on malapportionment and the implications of Sanders v. Gray, 372 U.S. 368, 83 S. Ct. 801, 9 L. Ed. 2d 821 (1963), see 14 Mercer L. Rev. 401 (1963). For comment on Heard v. Bolton, 107 Ga. 863, 131 S.E.2d 835 (1963), as to reasonable exercise of municipality’s police power, see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 297 (1963). For comment on Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 83 S. Ct. 801, 9 L. Ed. 2d 821 (1963), holding county unit system per se unconstitutional under “one man, one vote” doctrine, see 26 Ga. B.J. 339 (1964). For comment on Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487, 83 S. Ct. 774, 9 L. Ed. 2d 899 (1963), upholding indigent’s right to transcript, see 26 Ga. B.J. 346 (1964). For comment discussing motion picture as protected as speech, in light of Atlanta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 219 Ga. 271, 133 S.E.2d 12 (1963), see 26 Ga. B.J. 442 (1964). For comment on Harris v. United States, 321 F.2d 739 (6th Cir. 1963), holding invalid search incident to arrest where primary purpose is to search for evidence and not make a valid arrest, see 26 Ga. B.J. 446 (1964). For comment on Atlanta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 219 Ga. 271, 133 S.E.2d 12 (1963), see 26 Ga. B.J. 475 (1964). For article, “The Fourteenth Amendment and Confessions of Guilt: Role of the Supreme Court,” see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 309 (1964). For note discussing habeas corpus as a means of exerting control by the central government in protecting the constitutional rights of criminal defendants and the ramifications for federalism, see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 281 (1964). For note suggesting attorney’s due process right to be compensated for representing an indigent, see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 367 (1964). For comment on Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S. Ct. 526, 11 L. Ed. 2d 81 (1964), congressional districting, see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 504 (1964). For comment criticizing Lovett v. State, 108 Ga. App. 478, 133 S.E.2d 595 (1963), as to right of accused to assistance of counsel in making an unsworn statement, see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 512 (1964). For comment on right of refugees to homestead exemption, in light of Juarrero v. McNayr, 157 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1963), see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 525 (1964). For comment discussing admissibility of voluntary statements made after indictment and release on bail in absence of retained counsel, in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S. Ct. 1199, 12 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1964), see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 343 (1964). For comment on Balkcom v. Shores, 219 Ga. 429, 134 S.E.2d 3 (1963), see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 359 (1964). For article, “Changing Constitutional Concepts in Criminal Law and Procedure,” see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 421 (1965). For article, “The Indigent Defendant in Georgia Prior to Gideon v. Wainwright,” see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 207 (1965). For comment discussing Dukes v. State, 109 Ga. App. 825, 137 S.E.2d 532 (1964), as to an accused’s constitutional right to be questioned by his counsel in making an unsworn statement to the court pursuant to § 24-9-20, prior to the elimination of the unsworn statement provision, see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 350 (1965). For comment on Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 84 S. Ct. 1489, 12 L. Ed. 653 (1964), see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 358 (1965). For comment on Allen v. State, 110 Ga. App. 56, 137 S.E.2d 711 (1964), see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 371 (1965). For comment on Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1964), see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 550 (1965). For comment on Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S. Ct. 1316, 12 L. Ed. 2d 377 (1964), see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 123 (1965). For note, “Equal Protection as a Defense to Selective Law Enforcement by Police Officials,” see 14 J. of Pub. L. 223 (1965). For article characterizing nonviolent demonstrations on the property of another as illegitimate exercises of the freedom of speech and espousing the “right not to listen,” see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 389 (1965). For article discussing discrimination in public accommodations, see 17 Mercer L. Rev. 338 (1965). For article discussing this amendment’s intent to guard against discriminatory actions by state officials and not private citizens, see 17 Mercer L. Rev. 352 (1965). For comment discussing “one man, one vote” doctrine in light of Wilkins v. Davis, 205 Va. 803, 139 S.E.2d 849 (1965), see 16 Mercer L. Rev. 446 (1965). For article supporting the adoption of comprehensive right to counsel legislation, see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 157 (1966). For note, “Mental Health Commitment Procedures in Georgia,” see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 230 (1966). For comment on Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296, 86 S. Ct. 486, 15 L. Ed. 2d 373 (1966), see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 487 (1966). For comment on Juelich v. United States, 342 F.2d 29 (5th Cir. 1965), see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 504 (1966). For comment, “Due Process and the Dismissal of Students at State-Supported Colleges and Universities,” see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 101 (1966). For article, “The Legal Status of the American Communist Party: 1965,” see 15 J. of Pub. L. 94 (1966). For article discussing former Justice Harlan’s use of history in approaching the problem of state legislative apportionment, see 15 J. of Pub. L. 181 (1966). For note discussing the denial of social security benefits to dependent children pursuant to substitute father provisions as violative of due process, prior to the 1967 amendments to Art. 1, Ch. 4, T. 49 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 385), see 15 J. of Pub. L. 349 (1966). For note discussing meaning of “Public Use” and analyzing theories of excess condemnation, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 274 (1966). For comment on Bond v. Floyd, 251 F. Supp. 333 (N.D. Ga. 1966), appearing below, see 17 Mercer L. Rev. 467 (1966). For comment on Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296, 86 S. Ct. 486, 15 L. Ed. 2d 373 (1966), appearing below, see 17 Mercer L. Rev. 474 (1966). For comment on procedural due process rights in quasi-judicial administrative proceedings into which extra-record information is introduced, in light of Dayco Corp. v. F.T.C., 362 F.2d 180 (6th Cir. 1966), see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 284 (1966). For comment on McLennan v. Undercofler, 222 Ga. 306, 149 S.E.2d 705 (1966), see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 290 (1966). For article, “The Supreme Court, the Individual and the Criminal Process,” see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 386 (1967). For article, “Federalism in Current Perspective,” see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 586 (1967). For article, “Reapportionment and Local Government,” see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 596 (1967). For note discussing racial discrimination in jury selection, see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 674 (1967). For note discussing the constitutionality of therapeutic abortion, see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 693 (1967). For note advocating a separate obscenity standard for youth as a potential court escape route from the United States Supreme Court’s “Supercensor” Role, see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 707 (1967). For note discussing constitutional problems with the bail system, see 4 Ga. St. B.J. 278 (1967). For note discussing prejudicial publicity before and during trial in light of Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966), see 16 J. of Pub. L. 215 (1967). For comment discussing equal voting rights and the equal protection clause in light of Fortson v. Morris, 385 U.S. 231, 87 S. Ct. 446, 17 L. Ed. 2d 330 (1966), see 16 J. of Pub. L. 417 (1967). For article, “The Right to Hold Public Office and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments,” see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 367 (1967). For note discussing constitutional issues raised by imprisonment for debt in sales of agricultural products under Ga. L. 1959, p. 143, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 440 (1967). For note tracing judicial attempts as enumerating areas protected by the U.S. Const., amend. 4, and advocating more uniformity, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 447 (1967). For note suggesting the demise of the “Child Benefit” theory in regards to appropriation of public funds for transportation of pupils to private and public schools, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 453 (1967). For comment on Reed v. Gardner, 261 F. Supp. 87 (C.D. Cal. 1966) as to constitutionality of inquiry into Medicare applicant’s political affiliation, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 495 (1967). For comment criticizing Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 87 S. Ct. 988, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1967) in its application of the U.S. Const., amend. 6, speedy trial guarantee to the states as an encroachment upon states rights, see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 497 (1967). For comment on State Hwy. Dep’t v. Branch, 222 Ga. 770, 152 S.E.2d 372 (1966), discussing regulation of outdoor advertising and billboards as a constitutional “Taking,” see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 499 (1967). For comment on extension of exclusionary rule to civil cases in light of Williams v. Williams, 8 Ohio Misc. 156, 221 N.E.2d 622 (1966), see 18 Mercer L. Rev. 501 (1967). For article, “The Continuing Challenge of the Fourteenth Amendment,” see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (1968). For article discussing application of the “one-man-one-vote” rule to municipal governments, see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 110 (1968). For note, “Substantive Due Process and Felony Treatment of Pot Smokers: The Current Conflict,” see 2 Ga. L. Rev. 247 (1968). For comment on Talbert v. State, 224 Ga. 291, 161 S.E.2d 279 (1968), see 5 Ga. St. B.J. 256 (1968). For article, “The Right to Denounce Public Officials in England and the United States,” see 17 J. of Pub. L. 78 (1968). For article, “Police Interrogation and the Supreme Court: An Inquiry into the Limits of Judicial Policy-Making,” see 17 J. of Pub. L. 241 (1968). For article, “Law and Social Change: The Dynamics of the ‘State Action’ Doctrine,” see 17 J. of Pub. L. 258 (1968). For note criticizing school policies governing student personal appearance, see 17 J. of Pub. L. 151 (1968). For comment criticizing Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 379 F.2d 33 (8th Cir. 1967), as to discrimination by a subdivision development who has not received government monetary aid, see 17 J. of Pub. L. 175 (1968). For comment discussing standard of malice in cases involving reckless disregard to truth, in light of St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727, 88 S. Ct. 1323, 20 L. Ed. 2d 262 (1968), see 17 J. of Pub. L. 426 (1968). For comment criticizing use of detainer by state to effectively thwart the right to speedy trial of federal defendants in state court, in light of State v. Evans, 432 P.2d 175 (Ore. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 971, 88 S. Ct. 1093, 19 L. Ed. 2d 1182 (1968), see 17 J. of Pub. L. 431 (1968). For article, “Judicial Renunciation of the Political Questions Doctrine for Reapportionment: The Case of Local Government,” see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 312 (1968). For comment on Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1964), overturning the mere privilege doctrine by applying due process requirement to liquor licensing, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 250 (1968). For comment on Davis v. Firment, 269 F. Supp. 524 (E.D. La. 1967) as to constitutionality of public schools regulation of student appearance, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 252 (1968). For comment on Loving v. Commonwealth, 206 Va. 924, 147 S.E.2d 78 (1966), rev’d, 388 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1817, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010 (1967), banning anti-miscegenation statutes, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 255 (1968). For comment on National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753, 87 S. Ct. 1389, 18 L. Ed. 2d 505 (1967), as to constitutionality of imposing state use taxes on out of state mail order form, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 257 (1968). For comment on Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523, 87 S. Ct. 1727, 18 L. Ed. 2d 930 (1967), applying U.S. Const., amend. 4 guarantees to unreasonable searches by administrative agencies, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 259 (1968). For comment on Francois v. State, 197 So. 2d 492 (Fla. App. 1967), discussing the admissibility of juveniles’ confessions in criminal court, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 261 (1968). For comment on Nelson v. State, 151 N.W.2d 694 (Wis. 1967), as to constitutionality of appointment of general practitioner as an expert witness on issue of defendant’s sanity, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 263 (1968). For comment on White v. Blackwell, 277 F. Supp. 211 (N.D. Ga. 1967), analyzing constitutional implications of prison rules forbidding prisoners from assisting one another in legal matters, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 438 (1968). For comment on State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388, 154 N.W.2d 888 (1967), as to an indigent misdemeanant’s right to counsel, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 440 (1968). For comment on Hughes v. Reynolds, 223 Ga. 727, 157 S.E.2d 746 (1967), holding the Sunday Business Activities Act of 1967 (chapter 96-8) unconstitutional, see 19 Mercer L. Rev. 479 (1968). For article discussing the movement for the recognition and protection of human rights in the United States, see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 651 (1969). For note, “College Searches and Seizures: Privacy and Due Process Problems on Campus,” see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 426 (1969). For note, “Welfare Due Process: The Maximum Grant Limitation on the Right to Survive,” see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 459 (1969). For note, “Black, White, Brown and Green Color Consciousness in Public School Desegregation,” see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 728 (1969). For comment discussing Williams v. Dandridge, 297 F. Supp. 450 (D. Md. 1969), as to the validity under this amendment of a state “maximum grant” welfare provision, see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 203 (1969). For comment discussing Esteban v. Central Mo. State College, 415 F.2d 1077 (8th Cir. 1969), as to the applicability of due process “specificity” requirements to college regulations governing mass gatherings and demonstrations, see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 221 (1969). For article discussing the constitutionality of imposing harsher sentences upon defendants found guilty in new trial after appeal, see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 183 (1969). For article discussing functional broadening of Congress’ delegated powers and its effect on civil liberties, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 103 (1969). For article, “Constitutional Rights, Tribal Justice, and the American Indian,” see 18 J. of Pub. L. 311 (1969). For comment on Baker v. City of St. Petersberg, 400 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1968), as to unconstitutionality of police department practice of assigning black officers solely on the basis of race, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 189 (1969). For comment on Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68, 88 S. Ct. 1509, 20 L. Ed. 2d 436 (1968), as to illegitimate child’s right to recover for wrongful death of mother, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 198 (1969). For comment discussing probable cause for search warrant in obscenity case, in light of Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia, 392 U.S. 636, 88 S. Ct. 2103, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1313 (1968) (per curiam), see 18 J. of Pub. L. 205 (1969). For comment on Jenness v. Little, Civil No. 12762 (N.D. Ga. 1969), holding bar against placement of candidate’s name on ballot due to inability to pay qualifying fee is denial of equal protection, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 483 (1969). For comment on State v. Rand, 20 Ohio Misc. 98, 247 N.E.2d 342 (Com. Pleas 1969), holding criminal defendant competent to stand trial under properly administered tranquilizing drugs, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 503 (1969). For comment on Williams v. Dutton, 400 F.2d 797 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1105, 89 S. Ct. 908, 21 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1969), mandating in camera examination of evidence withheld by prosecution, see 18 J. of Pub. L. 510 (1969). For article discussing Juvenile Court System and proposing due process reforms to protect juveniles, see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 400 (1969). For article, “Justice Black and the Intentions of the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment’s First Section: The Bill of Rights and the States,” see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 432 (1969). For note discussing free speech and the parameters of the concept of “state action” in light of Food Employees Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc., 391 U.S. 308, 88 S. Ct. 1601, 20 L. Ed. 2d 603 (1968), see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 297 (1969). For note discussing operation of Implied Consent Law and constitutional issues raised by the concept, see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 489 (1969). For note discussing the constitutional origins of the substantive right to family autonomy, see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 719 (1969). For comment on Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474, 88 S. Ct. 1114, 20 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1968), as to application of the one man, one vote principal to local government elections, see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 454 (1969). For comment on Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 89 S. Ct. 733, 21 L. Ed. 2d 731 (1969), discussing limits on regulation of students’ symbolic speech, see 20 Mercer L. Rev. 505 (1969). For comment on O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S. Ct. 1683, 23 L. Ed. 2d 291 (1969), as to when a soldier should be tried in military or civilian court, see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 311 (1969). For comment discussing limits on the military’s jurisdiction and the constitutional rights of servicemen in light of O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S. Ct. 1683, 23 L. Ed. 2d 291 (1969), see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 311 (1969). For comment on Sams v. Olah, 225 Ga. 497, 169 S.E.2d 790 (1969), as to the constitutionality of the State Bar Act (ch. 9-7), see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 355 (1969). For comment on Jenness v. Little, 306 F. Supp. 925 (N.D. Ga. 1969), on motion for stay on appeal and injunctive relief sub nom. Matthews v. Little, 396 U.S. 1223, 90 S. Ct. 17, 24 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1969), as to the constitutionality of requiring a filing fee as prerequisite to candidacy in municipal elections, see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 369 (1969). For note discussing limitations on national police power, see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 359 (1970). For note, “Illegitimacy: Equal Protection and How to Enjoy It,” see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 383 (1970). For note, “Selecting and Certifying National Political Convention Delegates — A Party or a State Right?” see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 875 (1970). For comment on Weeks v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 408 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1969), appearing below, see 4 Ga. L. Rev. 417 (1970). For article, “A Review of Georgia’s Probation Laws,” see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 255 (1970). For article, “Reapportionment Reca-pitulated: 1960-1970,” see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 191 (1970). For note on discriminatory charitable trusts in Georgia, with regard to application of the cy pres doctrine, in light of Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296, 86 S. Ct. 486, 15 L. Ed. 2d 373 (1966), see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 428 (1970). For comment on Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Mem. Presbyterian Church, 225 Ga. 259, 167 S.E.2d 658 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041, 90 S. Ct. 680, 24 L. Ed. 2d 685 (1970), see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 438 (1970). For article, “Allegedly Disruptive Student Behavior and the Legal Authority of School Officials,” see 19 J. of Pub. L. 209 (1970). For article analyzing relationship of religion and government in United States from a sociological and theological perspective, see 19 J. of Pub. L. 283 (1970). For comment concerning free speech aspects of F.C.C. fairness doctrine, in light of Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 381 F.2d 908 (D.C. Cir. 1967), see 19 J. of Pub. L. 129 (1970). For comment on Kirk v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Cal., 273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 78 Cal. Rptr. 260 (1969), upholding durational residency classification for state university tuition rates, see 19 J. of Pub. L. 139 (1970). For comment on Palmer v. Thompson, 419 F.2d 1222 (5th Cir. 1969) (en banc), as to the constitutionality of closing state recreational facilities, see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 507 (1970). For comment on Parham v. State, 120 Ga. App. 723, 171 S.E.2d 911 (1969) and the rejection of charge that defendant must prove alibi to the satisfaction of the jury, see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 511 (1970). For article considering the power of the United States House of Representatives to expel a member and the power of the judiciary to review such an expulsion, see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 203 (1971). For article, “The Principle of Nondivi-siveness and the Constitutionality of Public Aid to Parochial Schools,” see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 429 (1971). For article discussing the evolution of municipal annexation law in Georgia in light of Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. City of Bremen, 227 Ga. 1, 178 S.E.2d 868 (1970), see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 499 (1971). For article, “Federalizing Through the Franchise: The Supreme Court and Local Government,” see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 34 (1971). For note, “Regulation and Ownership of the Marshlands: The Georgia Marshlands Act,” see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 563 (1971). For note advocating revision of former Georgia abortion statutes, see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 168 (1971). For comment on United States v. Barash, 428 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1970), as to the constitutionality under the principle of double jeopardy, of increasing severity of punishment on retrial following successful appeal, see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 194 (1971). For comment on the right to vote as affected by state residency requirements, in light of Blumstein v. Ellington, 337 F. Supp. 323 (M.D. Tenn. 1970), see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 389 (1971). For comment on United States v. West Peachtree Tenth Corp., 437 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1971), see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 603 (1971). For article discussing due process in juvenile court procedures in California and Georgia, in light of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1967), see 8 Ga. St. B.J. 9 (1971). For note discussing the constitutional implications of higher nonresident tuition fees charged by state universities, see 8 Ga. St. B.J. 86 (1971). For comment on Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 91 S. Ct. 1586, 29 L. Ed. 2d 90 (1971), discussing the revocation of a motorist’s license pursuant to the state’s financial responsibility laws, without hearing to determine fault prior to the enactment of the present Georgia Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, see 8 Ga. St. B.J. 252 (1971). For comment on United States v. Brand Jewelers, Inc., 318 F. Supp. 1293 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), as to implied power of the executive to sue, see 20 J. of Pub. L. 337 (1971). For article on the judicial development of this amendment’s due process clause and the selective incorporation of the Bill of Rights, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 533 (1971). For comment on Mary Doe v. Bolton, 319 F. Supp. 1048 (N.D. Ga. 1970), as to unconstitutionality of statutory limitation on reasons for abortion, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 461 (1971). For comment on Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 90 S. Ct. 1057, 25 L. Ed. 2d 353 (1970) regarding constitutionality under U.S. Const., amend. 6, confrontation clause of expulsion of defendant from the courtroom for misconduct, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 467 (1971). For comment on Maddox v. Fortson, 226 Ga. 71, 172 S.E.2d 595, cert. denied, 397 U.S. 149, 90 S. Ct. 999, 25 L. Ed. 2d 183 (1970), as to the constitutionality under U.S. Const., amend. 1, and this amendment of prohibiting succession by an incumbent Governor until after the expiration of a four-year period, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 473 (1971). For comment on Freeman v. Wilcox, 119 Ga. App. 325, 167 S.E.2d 163 (1969) and a juvenile’s right to counsel at preadjudicatory stages of juvenile proceedings, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 597 (1971). For comment on State Hwy. Dep’t v. Owens, 120 Ga. App. 647, 171 S.E.2d 770 (1969), and the right to inquire as to property owner’s knowledge of condemnation prior to making improvements, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 616 (1971). For comment on Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S. Ct. 210, 27 L. Ed. 2d 213 (1970) and Georgia’s coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule, see 22 Mercer L. Rev. 791 (1971). For article discussing equal protection and access to the judicial system, see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 247 (1972). For article, “Fourteenth Amendment Procedural Due Process: From the ‘Fair Trial’ Rule to Selective Incorporation,” see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 157 (1972). For comment on Palmer v. Thompson, 403 U.S. 217, 91 S. Ct. 1940, 29 L. Ed. 2d 438 (1971), upholding city’s refusal to operate an integrated pool in the face of equal protection attack, see 8 Ga. St. B.J. 382 (1972). For comment on Corley v. Lewless, 227 Ga. 745, 182 S.E.2d 766 (1971), holding parental liability statute which formerly provided for unlimited liability of parents for willful torts of minor children on the basis of parent-child relationship violative of due process, see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 129 (1972). For article discussing equal protection in public school financing through taxation, in light of Serrano v. Priest, 5 Cal. 3d 584, 96 Cal. Rptr. 601, 487 P.2d 1241 (1971), see 21 J. of Pub. L. 23 (1972). For comment on In re Kras, 331 F. Supp. 1207 (E.D.N.Y. 1971), holding the required prepayment of a filing fee by an indigent in a bankruptcy proceeding violative of equal protection and due process, see 21 J. of Pub. L. 239 (1972). For article, “State Action and Civil Rights,” see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 519 (1972). For comment on Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395, 91 S. Ct. 668, 28 L. Ed. 2d (1971), as to unconstitutionality of imprisonment of indigent for nonpayment of traffic fines, see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 361 (1972). For comment on Reeves v. Motor Contract Co., 324 F. Supp. 1011 (N.D. Ga. 1971), see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 369 (1972). For comment suggesting replacement of former Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act with a Compulsory Liability Insurance System, in light of Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 91 S. Ct. 1586, 29 L. Ed. 2d 90 (1971), see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 383 (1972). For comment criticizing Corley v. Lewless, 227 Ga. 745, 182 S.E.2d 776 (1971), as to constitutionality of § 51-2-3 prior to 1976 amendment, see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 681 (1972). For comment discussing Smith v. Smith, 454 F.2d 572 (5th Cir. 1971), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied February 1, 1972, see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 977 (1972). For article discussing due process restraints on ex parte injunctions, see 7 Ga. L. Rev. 246 (1973). For article, “Equal Protection for Juveniles: The Present Status of Sex-Based Discrimination in Juvenile Court Laws,” see 7 Ga. L. Rev. 494 (1973). For comment discussing constitutionality of conviction upon less-than-unanimous jury vote, see 7 Ga. L. Rev. 339 (1973). For comment on South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 482 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1973), appearing below, see 8 Ga. L. Rev. 254 (1973). For comment on Ruff v. Lee, 230 Ga. 426, 197 S.E.2d 376 (1973), appearing below, see 8 Ga. L. Rev. 264 (1973). For article, “The Response of Georgia’s Public School Systems to the School Prayer Decisions: ‘Whipping a Dead Horse,”’ see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 425 (1973). For comment discussing aspects of Georgia’s bail trover proceeding as violative of due process, in light of Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96, 189 S.E.2d 403 (1972), see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 336 (1973). For comment on Bassett v. Smith, 464 F.2d 347 (5th Cir. 1972), refusing to apply decision holding Georgia’s alibi instruction unconstitutional retroactively, see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 500 (1973). For comment on Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Dist., 410 U.S. 719, 93 S. Ct. 1224, 35 L. Ed. 2d 659 (1973), discussing the application of the equal protection reasonableness test to voter qualification and vote weighting, see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 144 (1973). For comment on Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 93 S. Ct. 739, 35 L. Ed. 2d 201 (1973), and Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 (1973), see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 153 (1973). For comment on Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp., 230 Ga. 58, 195 S.E.2d 399 (1973), see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 164 (1973). For article, “Privacy in the Corporate State: A Constitutional Value of Dwin-dling Significance,” see 22 J. of Pub. L. 3 (1973). For article, “Racial Gerrymandering and Southern State Legislative Redistricting: Attorney General Determinations Under the Voting Rights Act,” see 22 J. of Pub. L. 37 (1973). For article discussing federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the effect credit reporting has upon the constitutional right to privacy, see 22 J. of Pub. L. 67 (1973). For comment on Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 92 S. Ct. 1983, 32 L. Ed. 2d 556 (1972), holding the seizure of property in replevin without notice and hearing or waiver as violative of due process, see 22 J. of Pub. L. 169 (1973). For comment on Stoner v. Fortson, Civil No. 16271 (N.D. Ga. May 11, 1972), holding fee requirement for placement on primary ballot unconstitutional, see 22 J. of Pub. L. 243 (1973). For comment on Moose Lodge v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163, 92 S. Ct. 1965, 32 L. Ed. 2d 627 (1972), holding the granting of a liquor license to a discriminatory private club insufficient to constitute state action prohibited by this amendment, see 22 J. of Pub. L. 281 (1973). For article discussing the legal and philosophical bases of the “fair trial” construction of procedural due process, repudiated by the Warren Court in favor of selective incorporation of the Bill of Rights, see 24 Mercer L. Rev. 621 (1973). For comment discussing the death penalty in light of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972), see 24 Mercer L. Rev. 891 (1973). For article advocating personal privacy as determinative test for standing in suppression of illegally seized evidence, see 23 Emory L.J. 111 (1974). For article, “The Changing Parameters of Substantive Equal Protection: From the Warren to the Burger Era,” see 23 Emory L.J. 657 (1974). For article contrasting judicial review applying “one person, one vote” doctrine between Warren and Burger courts, see 23 Emory L.J. 701 (1974). For article discussing treatment of substantive equal protection by Burger court, see 23 Emory L.J. 765 (1974). For article discussing judicial review of “one person, one vote” under Burger court, see 23 Emory L.J. 777 (1974). For article, “The Supreme Court and Civil Liberties: 1973-1974,” see 23 Emory L.J. 905 (1974). For note advocating judicial discretion in permitting a pro se defense, see 23 Emory L.J. 523 (1974). For note discussing rights of pregnant worker under Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the equal protection clause, see 23 Emory L.J. 787 (1974). For note discussing self-incrimination in relation to mandatory reporting of illegally obtained income, see 23 Emory L.J. 1119 (1974). For comment as to constitutionality of financing public schools by means of local property taxes, in light of San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 93 S. Ct. 1278, 36 L. Ed. 2d 16 (1973), see 23 Emory L.J. 211 (1974). For comment on de facto school segregation, in light of Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 413 U.S. 189, 93 S. Ct. 2686, 37 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1973), see 23 Emory L.J. 293 (1974). For comment criticizing Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S. Ct. 2607, 37 L. Ed. 2d 419 (1973), calling for application of contemporary community standards to determine obscenity, see 23 Emory L.J. 551 (1974). For comment on Scarpa v. United States Bd. of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S. Ct. 79, 38 L. Ed. 2d 44, vacated as moot, 501 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1973), declining to accord parole release hearings, judicial review and procedural due process rights, see 23 Emory L.J. 597 (1974). For comment on Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. 2d 656 (1973), as to probationer’s rights at probation revocation, see 23 Emory L.J. 617 (1974). For comment discussing due process and equal protection rights of illegitimate child denied social security benefits due to birth after father’s disability in light of Beaty v. Weinberger, 478 F.2d 300 (5th Cir. 1973), see 23 Emory L.J. 861 (1974). For comment criticizing Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17, 93 S. Ct. 1977, 36 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1973), permitting imposition increased sentence by jury after retrial, see 23 Emory L.J. 879 (1974). For article as to the power of Georgia local governments to regulate the trades and occupations of its citizens, see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 115 (1974). For note, “Behind Closed Doors: An Empirical Inquiry Into the Nature of Prison Discipline in Georgia,” see 8 Ga. L. Rev. 919 (1974). For comment on Simmons v. Jones, 478 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1973), appearing below, see 8 Ga. L. Rev. 510 (1974). For comment discussing Winters v. Cook, 489 F.2d 174 (5th Cir. 1973), as to validity of waiver of constitutional objection to the racial composition of a grand jury, see 8 Ga. L. Rev. 984 (1974). For comment on Construction Indus. Assoc. v. City of Petaluma, 375 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Cal. 1974), as to the authority of local governments to restrict population growth by means other than by the operation of demographic and market demands in light of the right to travel, see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 260 (1974). For comment on Ware v. State, 128 Ga. App. 407, 196 S.E.2d 896 (1973), discussing the right of an accused to retract guilty plea prior to judgment, see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 469 (1974). For comment discussing the right to present evidence for the purposes of rebutting presumption, in light of Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441, 93 S. Ct. 2230, 37 L. Ed. 2d 63 (1973), see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 484 (1974). For comment on Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S. Ct. 1764, 36 L. Ed. 2d 583 (1973), discussing the labeling of sex as a suspect classification for equal protection purposes, see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 493 (1974). For comment on James v. State, 230 Ga. 29, 195 S.E.2d 448 (1973), see 25 Mercer L. Rev. 935 (1974). For comment on Mitchell v. W.T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600, 94 S. Ct. 1895, 40 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1974), holding Louisiana ex parte procedure for sequestration of encumbered property did not violate due process, see 26 Mercer L. Rev. 325 (1974). For comment criticizing inadequate standards and nebulous measurements for review under Georgia death penalty statute, in light of Colby v. State, 231 Ga. 829, 204 S.E.2d 612 (1974), see 26 Mercer L. Rev. 331 (1974). For comment criticizing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 94 S. Ct. 1105, 39 L. Ed. 2d 347 (1974), holding petitioner’s right to confrontation was preeminent to state policy protecting anonymity of juvenile offenders, see 26 Mercer L. Rev. 343 (1974). For comment discussing elements of due process required for nonprobationary employee discharged without prior evidentiary hearing where administrative appeal is available, in light of Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 94 S. Ct. 1633, 40 L. Ed. 2d 15 (1974), see 26 Mercer L. Rev. 1429 (1974). For article, “Prisoners’ Perceptions of their Constitutional Rights: A Client’s View of the World of Criminal Justice,” see 24 Emory L.J. 67 (1975). For article, “The Supreme Court and Civil Liberties: 1974-1975,” see 24 Emory L.J. 937 (1975). For note analyzing appropriate standard of proof to meet due process requirements in cases involving loss of liberty, in light of Blunt v. United States, 322 A.2d 579 (D.C. App. 1974), see 24 Emory L.J. 105 (1975). For note discussing relaxation of judicial restrictions on search incident to lawful arrest, see 24 Emory L.J. 151 (1975). For note, “Chief Justice Vinson and the Politics of Desegregation,” see 24 Emory L.J. 243 (1975). For note, “Constitutionality of State Residency Requirements for Bar Admission,” see 24 Emory L.J. 425 (1975). For note, “The Constitutionality of Residency Requirements for Municipal Employees,” see 24 Emory L.J. 447 (1975). For note, “Application of the Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule to the Grand Jury,” see 24 Emory L.J. 471 (1975). For comment suggesting equal protection considerations of tax exemption for widows, in light of Kahn v. Shevin, 416 U.S. 351, 94 S. Ct. 1734, 40 L. Ed. 2d 189 (1974), see 24 Emory L.J. 169 (1975). For comment criticizing Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, 94 S. Ct. 2831, 41 L. Ed. 2d 730 (1974), holding state right-of-reply statute intrudes upon the freedom of the press, see 24 Emory L.J. 217 (1975). For comment criticizing Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345, 95 S. Ct. 449, 42 L. Ed. 2d 477 (1974), as to termination by privately owned utility of electric service, see 24 Emory L.J. 511 (1975). For comment criticizing Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809, 95 S. Ct. 2222, 44 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1975), holding abortion advertisement protected by commercial speech doctrine, see 24 Emory L.J. 1165 (1975). For comment on Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S. Ct. 1029, 43 L. Ed. 2d 328 (1975), holding a state may not impose sanctions on accurate publication of name of rape victim obtained from official court records, see 24 Emory L.J. 1205 (1975). For article discussing prejudgment garnishment and procedural due process, see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 589 (1975) (note prior to 1976 revision of garnishment law). For article, “Personal Liability of State Officials Under State and Federal Law,” see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 821 (1975). For article discussing federal taxing law in connection with land use planning, see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 53 (1975). For article discussing equal protection problems in annexation procedure providing merely for unilateral approval, see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 169 (1975). For note discussing airport noise as a “taking,” see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 218 (1975). For note discussing constitutionality of zoning ordinances prohibiting clustering of adult movie theatres, in light of American Mini Theatres, Inc. v. Gribbs, 518 F.2d 1014 (6th Cir. 1975), see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 275 (1975). For comment on Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S. Ct. 1029, 43 L. Ed. 2d 328 (1975), see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 963 (1975). For article discussing Georgia’s prejudgment garnishment law, prior to the enactment of the 1976 Acts, in light of North Ga. Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601, 95 S. Ct. 719, 42 L. Ed. 2d 751 (1975), see 11 Ga. St. B.J. 242 (1975). For article, “Toward a Constitutional Definition of Racial Discrimination,” see 25 Emory L.J. 509 (1976). For note discussing exclusion of maternity benefits from disability insurance schemes in light of the equal protection clause and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, see 25 Emory L.J. 125 (1976). For comment discussing defamatory falsehoods and first amendment protection in light of Time, Inc. v. Firestone, 424 U.S. 448, 96 S. Ct. 958, 47 L. Ed. 2d 154 (1976), see 25 Emory L.J. 705 (1976). For article discussing constitutional challenges to at-large elections on grounds of dilution of the vote, see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 353 (1976). For article proposing constitutional bases for a right to adequate health care, see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 391 (1976). For article suggesting possible constitutional vulnerability of Georgia statutes concerning succession by illegitimates, see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 447 (1976). For article, “A Realistic Reexamination of Rezoning Procedure: The Complementary Requirements of Due Process and Judicial Review,” see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 753 (1976). For article discussing preliminary hearings in felony cases as necessary to satisfy due process requirements, see 12 Ga. St. B.J. 207 (1976). For article discussing Allan v. Allan, 236 Ga. 199, 223 S.E.2d 445 (1976), holding Georgia’s notice requirement for year’s support unconstitutional prior to 1977 revision, see 13 Ga. St. B.J. 85 (1976). For article, “Sexual Privacy — Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions,” see 13 Ga. St. B.J. 93 (1976). For article discussing the extent and limitations of the equal protection clause as it applies to state attempts to restrict the investment of resident and nonresident aliens in domestic corporations, see 27 Mercer L. Rev. 615 (1976). For note discussing limits to prosecutor’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense, in light of United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S. Ct. 2392, 49 L. Ed. 2d 342 (1976), see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 383 (1976). For comment on Tyler v. Vickery, 517 F.2d 1089 (5th Cir. 1975), see 27 Mercer L. Rev. 1189 (1976). For comment on Johnson v. Wright, 509 F.2d 828 (5th Cir. 1975), see 27 Mercer L. Rev. 1207 (1976). For article, “Veterans’ Preferences in Public Employment: Unconstitutional Gender Discrimination?,” see 26 Emory L.J. 13 (1977). For comment on United States v. Whitesel, 543 F.2d 1176 (6th Cir. 1976), holding denial of defendant’s request to be represented at trial by a nonattorney not violative of U.S. Const., amend. 6, see 26 Emory L.J. 457 (1977). For comment on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S. Ct. 555, 50 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1977), as to failure to rezone for multifamily housing without discriminatory intent, see 26 Emory L.J. 681 (1977). For comment criticizing Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 97 S. Ct. 1401, 51 L. Ed. 2d 711 (1977), as to corporal punishment in public schools, see 26 Emory L.J. 885 (1977). For comment on Linmark Assocs. v. Township of Willingboro, 431 U.S. 85, 97 S. Ct. 1614, 52 L. Ed. 2d 155 (1977), as to free speech violation by local ordinance banning “for sale” and “sold” signs on residential property, see 26 Emory L.J. 913 (1977). For article analyzing commercial and government deprivation cases involving procedural due process, and advocating application of the same constitutional standard to both, see 11 Ga. L. Rev. 477 (1977). For comment on Colaizzi v. Walker, 542 F.2d 969 (7th Cir. 1976), recognizing a liberty interest in state employees against whom damaging charges were published in the course of their discharge by state officials without due process, see 11 Ga. L. Rev. 437 (1977). For article discussing due process problems with Georgia’s post-judgment garnishment procedures, in light of City Fin. Co. v. Winston, 238 Ga. 10, 231 S.E.2d 45 (1976), see 13 Ga. St. B.J. 144 (1977). For article critically analyzing the various elements constitutionally required for prejudgment seizure of a debtor’s property, focusing on § 9-503 of the U.C.C., see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 665 (1977). For comment discussing constitutionality of regulating location of “Adult Theaters” on basis of film content in light of Young v. American Mini Theaters, 427 U.S. 50, 96 S. Ct. 2440, 49 L. Ed. 2d 310 (1976), see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 587 (1977). For comment on Brown v. Liberty Loan Corp., 539 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1976), as to constitutionality of Florida post judgment garnishment statutes failing to provide notice or hearing on entitlement to statutory wage exemption prior to wage attachment, see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 997 (1977). For comment on Coleman v. Bradford, 238 Ga. 505, 233 S.E.2d 764 (1977), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 335 (1977). For comment discussing extension of the minimum contacts concept to personal jurisdiction in divorce litigation in light of Whitaker v. Whitaker, 237 Ga. 895, 230 S.E.2d 486 (1976), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 341 (1977). For article discussing constitutional rights of students to form religious clubs in the public school setting, and possible establishment problems, see 27 Emory L.J. 3 (1978). For article, “Toward a Perspective on the Death Penalty Cases,” see 27 Emory L.J. 469 (1978). For article, “Federal Antibias Legislation and Academic Freedom: Some Problems with Enforcement Procedures,” see 27 Emory L.J. 609 (1978). For note applying first amendment free speech tests to commercial and noncommercial defamation of corporations and their products and services, see 27 Emory L.J. 755 (1978). For comment on Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners’ Labor Union, Inc., 433 U.S. 119, 97 S. Ct. 2532, 53 L. Ed. 2d 629 (1977), upholding certain prison regulations relating to prisoners “union,” see 27 Emory L.J. 137 (1978). For comment discussing doctrine of substituted judgment and constitutional underpinnings of a qualified right to refuse medical treatment asserted for an incompetent, in light of Superintendent of Belcherton State School v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E.2d 417 (Mass. 1977), see 27 Emory L.J. 425 (1978). For article, “The Supreme Court on Privacy and the Press,” see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 215 (1978). For note discussing constitutional issues affecting executions, see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 814 (1978). For note discussing constitutional developments affecting garnishment procedures, see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 814 (1978). For note discussing constitutional issues affecting attachment procedures, see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 814 (1978). For article discussing the impact on bond issues of challenges to voting procedures, see 15 Ga. St. B.J. 15 (1978). For article discussing the application of minimum contacts standard to state court assertion of quasi-in-rem jurisdiction, in light of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S. Ct. 2569, 53 L. Ed. 2d 683 (1977), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 655 (1978). For note discussing the constitutional conflicts between civil rights and the free exercise of religion in private, racially segregated sectarian schools, see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 1099 (1978). For note discussing televised and photographic coverage of court proceedings in light of the individuals’ right to a fair trial, see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 1099 (1978). For note discussing how an open end or dragnet clause within a deed to secure debt ensnares subsequent purchasers of real property in light of Commercial Bank v. Readd, 240 Ga. 519, 242 S.E.2d 25 (1978), see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 363 (1978). For comment on Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562, 97 S. Ct. 2849, 53 L. Ed. 2d 965 (1977), as to media’s nonprotection under U.S. Const., amend. 1, and this amendment from suit by performer whose “right of publicity” has been infringed, see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 861 (1978). For comment as to placement of the burden of proving an affirmative defense on defendant, as developed in Patterson v. State, 432 U.S. 197, 97 S. Ct. 2319, 53 L. Ed. 2d 281 (1977), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 875 (1978). For comment criticizing Drummond v. Fulton County Dep’t of Family & Children’s Servs., 563 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 437 U.S. 910, 98 S. Ct. 3103, 57 L. Ed. 2d 1141 (1978), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 1137 (1978). For note, “ERA: The Effect of Extending the Time for Ratification on Attempts to Rescind Prior Ratifications,” see 28 Emory L.J. 71 (1979). For comment on United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 98 S. Ct. 2610, 57 L. Ed. 2d 582 (1978), regarding consideration by sentencing judge of his belief that defendant falsely testified during trial, see 28 Emory L.J. 159 (1979). For comment discussing impact of U.S. Const., amend. 1 upon state statute prohibiting corporate spending to influence voters on referenda not materially affecting corporation’s business in light of First Nat’l Bank v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 98 S. Ct. 1407, 55 L. Ed. 2d 707 (1978), see 28 Emory L.J. 183 (1979). For article, “In their own image: The reframing of the due process clause by the United States Supreme Court,” see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 479 (1979). For article, “Abortion, Poverty and the Equal Protection of the Laws,” see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 505 (1979). For article discussing the courts’ interpretation of “liberty,” see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 1447 (1979). For comment on a nuisance-abatement statute applied to authorize prior restraint on exhibition of unnamed films, in the future as violative of the federal Constitution in Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 587 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1978), probable jurisdiction noted, 442 U.S. 928, 99 S. Ct. 2857, 61 L. Ed. 2d 295 (1979), aff’d, 445 U.S. 308, 100 S. Ct. 1156, 63 L. Ed. 2d 413 (1980), see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 1076 (1979). For article discussing federal civil litigation, with respect to U.S. Const., Art. III, U.S. Const., amend. 1, this amendment and U.S. Const., amend. 15 issues, see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 821 (1979). For note, “Constitutionally Implied Causes of Action: A Policy of Protection, Expansion, or Restriction?,” see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 1023 (1979). For comment on Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 99 S. Ct. 675, 58 L. Ed. 2d 596 (1979), in light of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 (1973), see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 761 (1979). For comment on Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist., 439 U.S. 410, 99 S. Ct. 693, 58 L. Ed. 2d 619 (1979), see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 1079 (1979). For comment on Crim v. McWhorter, 242 Ga. 863, 252 S.E.2d 421 (1979), see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 341 (1979). For comment on Alderman v. State, 241 Ga. 496, 246 S.E.2d 642, cert. denied, 439 U.S. 991, 99 S. Ct. 593, 58 L. Ed. 2d 666 (1978), see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 349 (1979). For article, “Status and Freedom in American Constitutional Law,” see 29 Emory L.J. 3 (1980). For article discussing the concept of a mandatory public service obligation for lawyers, see 29 Emory L.J. 997 (1980). For comment, “Bivens and the Creation of a Cause of Action for Money Damages Arising Directly From the Due Process Clauses,” see 29 Emory L.J. 231 (1980). For comment on Columbus Bd. of Educ. v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 (1979), regarding the equal protection clause and school desegregation, see 29 Emory L.J. 481 (1980). For comment on Statutes Requiring Consent of Mother, But Not of Father, As Prerequisite to Adoption of Illegitimate Child, Violating the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, see 29 Emory L.J. 833 (1980). For comment on Shakman v. Democratic Organization, 481 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Ill. 1979), regarding constitutionality of patronage hiring practices based on political affiliation, see 29 Emory L.J. 1217 (1980). For comment on Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S. Ct. 2758, 65 L. Ed. 2d 902 (1980), regarding the constitutionality of the ten percent set aside for minority contractors, etc., see 29 Emory L.J. 1127 (1980). For comment on Rogers v. Medical Ass’n, 244 Ga. 151, 259 S.E.2d 85 (1979), invalidating Georgia statute requiring Governor’s appointments to Composite State Board of Medical Examiners (now Georgia Composite Medical Board) be made solely from nominees submitted by state medical society as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to a private organization, see Emory L.J. 1183 (1980). For article surveying 1979 Fifth Circuit decisions concerning various problems of this amendment, see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 885 (1980). For note, “Due Process Rights of Minors and Parental Authority in Civil Commitment Cases,” see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 617 (1980). For note, “Alien Teachers: Suspect Class or Subversive Influence?,” see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 815 (1980). For comment, “The Secularization of the Law and Sex Discrimination,” see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 581 (1980). For comment on Hoback v. Alabama, 607 F.2d 680 (5th Cir. 1979), discussing an indigent defendant’s rights to expert witnesses, see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 1103 (1980). For article criticizing the use of compensation as a remedy for invalid land-use regulations, see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 559 (1981). For note discussing abortion regulation in light of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 (1973), see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 681 (1981). For note discussing “Interstate Commerce” jurisdictional test in Sherman Act cases, in light of McLain v. Real Estate Bd., Inc., 444 U.S. 232, 100 S. Ct. 502, 62 L. Ed. 2d 441 (1980), see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 714 (1981). For comment discussing the forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs in light of Rogers v. Okin, 634 F.2d 650 (1st Cir. 1980), see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 739 (1981). For article, “Regulation of Advertising by Lawyers in Georgia,” see 18 Ga. St. B.J. 6 (1981). For article, “Constitutional Criminal Litigation,” see 32 Mercer L. Rev. 993 (1981). For article, “The Bloodless Revolution: The Role of the Fifth Circuit in the Integration of the Deep South,” see 32 Mercer L. Rev. 1149 (1981). For article surveying developments in Georgia constitutional law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 51 (1981). For note discussing an individual’s fourteenth amendment shield against discriminatory state action, see 32 Mercer L. Rev. 1275 (1981). For note on United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1980), see 32 Mercer L. Rev. 1329 (1981). For article discussing the insanity defense and propositions for its abolishment or modifications, see 31 Emory L.J. 9 (1982). For article discussing the role of the psychiatrist in the criminal process, see 31 Emory L.J. 61 (1982). For article, “Antimonopoly Tradition Under the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments: Slaughter-House Cases Re-examined,” see 31 Emory L.J. 785 (1982). For article, “The Concept of the Doctrine of the Court in Constitutional Law,” see 16 Ga. L. Rev. 357 (1982). For article, “Equal Protection and Personal Rights: The Regime of the ‘Discrete and Insular Minority’,” see 16 Ga. L. Rev. 407 (1982). For article, “The Fracture of Good Order: An Argument for Allowing Lawyers to Counsel the Civilly Disobedient,” see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 109 (1982). For note, “State standing in police misconduct cases: expanding the boundaries of parens patriae,” see 16 Ga. L. Rev. 865 (1982). For note, “Constitutional Challenges to Grand Jury Fore-person-Selection Procedures,” see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 153 (1982). For comment, “Jurisdiction over Nonresidents in Georgia: Crowder v. Ginn,” see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 201 (1982). For article discussing congressional legislation which seeks to overturn or frustrate constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 707 (1982). For article, “The ‘Forum State Interest’ Factor in Personal Jurisdiction Adjudication,” see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 769 (1982). For article discussing Eleventh Circuit court cases in the year 1981 dealing with constitutional civil law, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 1061 (1982). For survey article on constitutional law, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 53 (1982). For survey article on evidence, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 163 (1982). For survey article on local government law, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 225 (1982). For survey article on torts, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 271 (1982). For article, “The United States Supreme Court as Home Rule Wrecker,” see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 363 (1982). For comment, “The Expansion of Constitutional and Statutory Remedies for Sex Segregation in Education: The Fourteenth Amendment and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” see 32 Emory L.J. 1111 (1983). For comment, “Retail Liquor Licenses and Due Process: The Creation of Property Through Regulation,” see 32 Emory L.J. 1199 (1983). For article discussing the historical and rhetorical significance of the concept of equality, see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 245 (1983). For note, “Two Models of Prosecutorial Vindictiveness,” see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 467 (1983). For comment, “Free Press, Privacy, and Privilege: Protection of Researcher-Sub-ject Communications,” see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 1009 (1983). For comment discussing the unconstitutional use of deadly force against nonviolent fleeing felons, see 18 Ga. L. Rev. 137 (1983). For article discussing full faith and credit and federalism in choice of law questions, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 709 (1983). For article proposing an issue-by-issue analysis for resolution of choice of law questions, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 731 (1983). For article surveying 1982 Eleventh Circuit cases involving constitutional civil law, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 1221 (1983). For annual survey of constitutional law, see 35 Mercer L. Rev. 73 (1983). For comment, “The Right to Adequate Treatment Versus the Right to Refuse Antipsychotic Drug Treatment: A Solution to the Dilemma of the Involuntarily Committed Psychiatric Patient,” see 33 Emory L.J. 441 (1984). For comment, “Permissible State Aid to Parochial Schools: A Plea for Neutrality,” see 33 Emory L.J. 487 (1984). For comment, “Proposal: Bilingual Education Guidelines for the Courts and the Schools,” see 33 Emory L.J. 577 (1984). For article, “Substantive Due Process and the Scope of Constitutional Torts,” see 18 Ga. L. Rev. 201 (1984). For note, “An Assessment of the Use of Cameras in State and Federal Courts,” see 18 Ga. L. Rev. 389 (1984). For comment, “Ohio v. Johnson: Prohibiting the Offensive Use of Guilty Pleas to Invoke Double Jeopardy Protection,” see 19 Ga. L. Rev. 159 (1984). For article, “The Georgia Bill of Rights: Dead or Alive?,” see 34 Emory L.J. 341 (1985). For article, “The Bail Reform Act of 1984,” see 34 Emory L.J. 685 (1985). For comment, “The Psychotherapist-Client Testimonial Privilege: Defining the Professional Involved,” see 34 Emory L.J. 777 (1985). For comment, “The Effect of Firefighters Local Union 174 v. Stotts on the Negotiated Settlement of Title VII Suits,” see 34 Emory L.J. 827 (1985). For comment, “The Limits of the Neighborhood Justice Center: Why Domestic Violence Cases Should Not Be Mediated,” see 34 Emory L.J. 855 (1985). For article, “Constraints on Equal Access to Fundamental Liberties: Another Look at Professor Michelman’s Theory of Minimum Protection,” see 19 Ga. L. Rev. 1041 (1985). For case comment discussing Miranda v.Arizona ambiguous requests for counsel, see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 221 (1985). For note, “United States v. Leon: The Long-Awaited Good-Faith Exception has Finally Arrived,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 757 (1985). For note, “New York v. Quarles: A Public Safety Exception — Erosion of Miranda Under the Burger Court,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 1059 (1985). For note, “Clark v. Community for Creative Nonviolence: The Demise of First Amendment Protection for Symbolic Expression?,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 1371 (1985). For note, “Oliver v. United States: Will Exceptions of Privacy Shield Criminal Acts No More?,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 1401 (1985). For note, “SEC v. Lowe: Protected Speech or Regulation of a Profession?,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 1421 (1985). For comment, “The Expanding Scope of Appellate Review in Libel Cases — The Supreme Court Abandons the Clearly Erroneous Standard of Review for Findings of Actual Malice,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 711 (1985). For comment, “Can Georgia’s Rape Shield Statute Withstand a Constitutional Challenge?,” see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 991 (1985). For article, “Problems in Search of Principles: The First Amendment in the Supreme Court from 1791-1930,” see 35 Emory L.J. 59 (1986). For article, “The Right to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment: Law and Medicine at the Interface,” see 35 Emory L.J. 139 (1986). For article, “Cable Theft: The Problem, The Need for Useful State Legislation and a Proposed Solution for Georgia,” see 35 Emory L.J. 643 (1986). For article, “Constitutional Judgment on Non-public School Aid: Fresh Guidelines or New Roadblocks?,” see 35 Emory L.J. 795 (1986). For comment, “Just Compensation for Temporary Regulatory Takings: A Discussion of Factors Influencing Damage Awards,” see 35 Emory L.J. 729 (1986). For comment, “Use and Abuse of Urinalysis Testing in the Workplace: A Proposal for Federal Legislation Limiting Drug Screening,” see 35 Emory L.J. 1011 (1986). For article, “Justice and Juror,” see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 257 (1986). For note, “An Unconstitutional Fiction: The Felony-Murder Rule as Applied to the Supply of Drugs,” see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 671 (1986). For note, “Biological Parents v. Third Parties: Whose Right to Child Custody is Constitutionally Protected?,” see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 705 (1986). For note, “Grand Jury Subpoenas of a Target’s Attorney: The Need for a Preliminary Showing,” see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 747 (1986). For article, “Executing Those Who Kill Blacks: An Unusual Case Study,” see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 911 (1986). For article, “Court Ordered Surgery to Retrieve Evidence in Georgia in Light of the Supreme Court Decision in Winston v. Lee,” see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1005 (1986). For article, “Prosecutorial Misconduct During Closing Argument: The Arts of Knowing When and How to Object and of Avoiding the ‘Invited Response’ Doctrine,” see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1033 (1986). For survey of 1985 Eleventh Circuit cases on civil constitutional law, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1253 (1986). For survey of 1985 Eleventh Circuit cases on constitutional criminal procedure, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1275 (1986). For survey of 1985 Eleventh Circuit cases on employment discrimination, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1315 (1986). For survey of 1985 Eleventh Circuit cases on evidence, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1367 (1986). For survey of 1985 Eleventh Circuit cases on trial practice and procedure, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1505 (1986). For article, “Burden-Shifting Criminal Jury Instructions in Georgia,” see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (1986). For annual survey of law of business associations, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 57 (1986). For annual survey of criminal law, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 129 (1986). For comment, “Legislative Limitations on Medical Malpractice Damages: The Chances of Survival,” see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 1583 (1986). For article, “Amended Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act: What Is the Intent of the Results Test?,” see 36 Emory L.J. 1 (1987). For lecture on law and the unreasonable person, see 36 Emory L.J. 181 (1987). For article, “Truth and Uncertainty: Legal Control of the Destruction of Evidence,” see 36 Emory L.J. 1085 (1987). For essay, “Standing and Rights,” see 36 Emory L.J. 1195 (1987). For comment, “Private Prisons,” see 36 Emory L.J. 253 (1987). For comment, “Enforcing the Right to a Public Education for Children Afflicted with AIDS,” see 36 Emory L.J. 603 (1987). For article, “The Postdeprivation Remedy Doctrine of Parratt v. Taylor and its Application to Cases of Land Use Regulation,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 601 (1987). For article, “On Reintegrating Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 843 (1987). For article, “An Equal Opportunity Scorecard,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1007 (1987). For article, “Affirmative Action: A Needed Remedy,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1043 (1987). For article, “Affirmative Action in EEOC Litigation,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1059 (1987). For article, “Affirmative Action from a State Perspective: Old Myths and New Realities,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1095 (1987). For article, “The False Civil Rights Vision,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1119 (1987). For article, “Affirmative Action After Stotts,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1141 (1987). For case comment, “Booth v. Maryland: Admissibility of Victim Impact Statements During Sentencing Phase of Capital Murder Trials,” see 21 Ga. L. Rev. 1191 (1987). For article, “Lawyers Who Represent Local Governments,” see 23 Ga. St. B.J. 58 (1987). For article, “Contempt of Court in Georgia,” see 23 Ga. St. B.J. 66 (1987). For article, “Georgia’s Domestic Relations Long-Arm Statute, Circa 1986,” see 23 Ga. St. B.J. 74 (1987). For article, “Georgia and the Development of Constitutional Principles: An Essay in Honor of the Bicentennial,” see 24 Ga. St. B.J. 6 (1987). For survey of 1986 Eleventh Circuit cases on constitutional criminal procedure, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 1141 (1987). For survey of 1986 Eleventh Circuit cases on employment discrimination, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 1213 (1987). For survey of 1986 Eleventh Circuit cases on trial practice and procedure, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 1371 (1987). For case note, “Coleman v. Kemp: The Problem of Pretrial Publicity and Its Effect on the Alday Murder Cases,” see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 1477 (1987). For article, “The Constitution in the Supreme Court: 1946-1953,” see 37 Emory L.J. 249 (1988). For article, “The Court at the Cross-roads: Runyon, Section 1981 and the Meaning of Precedent,” see 37 Emory L.J. 949 (1988). For comment, “The Constitutional Implications of Mandatory Testing for Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome — AIDS,” see 37 Emory L.J. 217 (1988). For comment, “Davis v. Bandemer: Remedial Difficulties in Political Gerrymandering,” see 37 Emory L.J. 443 (1988). For comment, “Surrogate Mother Contracts: Analysis of a Remedial Quagmire,” see 37 Emory L.J. 721 (1988). For comment, “Batson v. Kentucky: Equal Protection, the Fair Cross-Section Requirement, and the Discriminatory Use of Peremptory Challenges,” see 37 Emory L.J. 755 (1988). For comment, “Nonpsychiatric Expert Assistance and the Requisite Showing of Need: A Catch-22 in the Post-Ake Criminal Justice System,” see 37 Emory L.J. 995 (1988). For comment, “Teacher Competency Testing: ‘Decertification’ and the Federal Constitution and Title VII,” see 37 Emory L.J. 1077 (1988). For article, “Is Disparity a Problem,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 283 (1988). For article, “Rethinking the Citizen As Prosecutor Model of Environmental Enforcement Under the Clean Water Act: Some Overlooked Problems of Outcome-Independent Values,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 337 (1988). For article, “Exclusion of Evidence in Federal Prosecutions on the Basis of State Law,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 667 (1988). For article, “Juvenileness: A Single-Edged Constitutional Sword,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 949 (1988). For article, “The Confused Constitutional Status and Meaning of Parental Rights,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 975 (1988). For article, “A Study of the Unified Appeal Procedure in Georgia,” see 23 Ga. L. Rev. 185 (1988). For note, “The Striker Amendment to the Food Stamp Act: Politics Chipping Away at the Union, Family, and Social Welfare,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 741 (1988). For note, “Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Wake of Bowers v. Hardwick,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 773 (1988). For note, “The Effect of Salerno v. United States on the Use of State Preventive Detention Legislation: A New Definition of Due Process,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 805 (1988). For case comment, “Taylor v. Ledbetter: Vindicating the Constitutional Rights of Foster Children to Adequate Care and Protection,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 1187 (1988). For case comment, “In re Baby Girl Eason: Balancing Three Competing Interests in Third Party Adoptions,” see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 1217 (1988). For article, “Legislative and Judicial Regulation of Junkyards,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 461 (1988). For article, “The Precedential Value of Unpublished Judicial Opinions,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 477 (1988). For article, “Religious Symbols and the Establishment of a National ‘Religion,’” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 495 (1988). For article, “Chicago Exposition: The New American Jurisprudential Writing as a Cultural Literature,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 767 (1988). For article, “Dworkin’s Hermeneutics,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 851 (1988). For survey of 1987 Eleventh Circuit cases on administrative law, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1057 (1988). For survey of 1987 Eleventh Circuit cases on appellate practice and procedure, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1129 (1988). For survey of 1987 Eleventh Circuit cases on constitutional law — civil, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1169 (1988). For survey of 1987 Eleventh Circuit cases on constitutional criminal procedure, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1187 (1988). For survey of 1987 Eleventh Circuit cases on employment discrimination, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1215 (1988). For survey of Eleventh Circuit cases on evidence, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1259 (1988). For annual survey of constitutional law, see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 117 (1988). For note, “McCleskey v. Kemp: An Equal Protection Challenge to Capital Punishment,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 675 (1988). For note, “Tison v. Arizona: A New Standard of Culpability for Accomplice Felony-Murder,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 717 (1988). For note, “In re Baby Girl Eason: Expanding the Constitutional Rights of Unwed Fathers,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 997 (1988). For note, “When Exactions Become Extortion: The Supreme Court Draws the Line in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission,” see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 1033 (1988). For article, “Children, Poverty and State Constitutions,” see 38 Emory L.J. 577 (1989). For article, “More Myths of Parity: State Court Forums and Constitutional Actions for the Right to Shelter,” see 38 Emory L.J. 615 (1989). For article, “A Senate of Five: An Essay on Sexuality and Law,” see 23 Ga. L. Rev. 859 (1989). For comment, “Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n: First Amendment Protection for ‘Targeted’ Advertisements by Attorneys,” see 23 Ga. L. Rev. 545 (1989). For comment, “New York State Club Ass’n v. City of New York: A Statutory Presumption Against Privacy,” see 23 Ga. L. Rev. 569 (1989). For article surveying 1988 constitutional criminal procedure decisions by the Eleventh Circuit, see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 1225 (1989). For article, “Securities Regulation and the First Amendment,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 223 (1990). For article, “Federal and State ‘State Action’: The Undercritical Embrace of a Hypercriticized Doctrine,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 327 (1990). For article, “Local Subdivision Regulation: Formulaic Constraints in an Age of Discretion,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 525 (1990). For article, “Feminism and the Limits of Equality,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 803 (1990). For article, “The Prospects for a Revival of Conservative Activism in Constitutional Jurisprudence,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 629 (1990). For note, “Determining Patient Competency in Treatment Refusal Cases,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 733 (1990). For comment, “An Establishment Clause Analysis of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 399 (1990). For comment, “Capital Punishment: New Weapons in the Sentencing Process,” see 24 Ga. L. Rev. 423 (1990). For note, “Georgia’s Not-so-long Arm Statute: Exposing the Myth,” see 6 Ga. State U.L. Rev. 487 (1990). For note, “Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: What Remains of the Right to Choose?,” see 41 Mercer L. Rev. 769 (1990). For article, “Signing into Heaven: Zinermon v. Burch, Federal Rights, and State Remedies Thirty Years After Monroe v. Pape,” see 40 Emory L.J. 1 (1991). For article, “Religious Exemptions As Affirmative Action,” see 40 Emory L.J. 77 (1991). For article, “The Right to ‘Plead Out’ Issues and Block the Admission of Prejudicial Evidence: The Differential Treatment of Civil Litigants and the Criminal Accused As A Denial of Equal Protection,” see 40 Emory L.J. 341 (1991). For comment, “Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC: The Constitutionality of the FCC’s Use of Racial Classifications,” see 25 Ga. L. Rev. 535 (1991). For article, “Spallone v. United States: When Constitutional Principles Collide,” see 7 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 527 (1991). For annual Eleventh Circuit survey of constitutional law — civil, see 42 Mercer L. Rev. 1313 (1991). For note, “Burnham v. Superior Court of California: The Transient Jurisdiction Rule’s Much Prophesied Death Sentence is Commuted to Life,” see 42 Mercer L. Rev. 1577 (1991). For note, “Zinermon v. Burch: Putting Brackets Around the Parratt Doctrine,” see 42 Mercer L. Rev. 1655 (1991). For article, “Criminal Discovery: Disclosure of Police Internal Affairs Division Documents and Police Personnel Files,” see 29 Ga. St. B.J. 34 (1992). For annual Eleventh Circuit survey of constitutional law — civil, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 1075 (1992). For article, “Individual Rights and the Powers of Government,” see 27 Ga. L. Rev. 343 (1993). For article, “The Peremptory Challenge: A Lost Cause?,” see 44 Mercer L. Rev. 579 (1993). For article, “Constitutional Civil Law,” see 44 Mercer L. Rev. 1107 (1993). For article, “Constitutional Criminal Law,” see 44 Mercer L. Rev. 1143 (1993). For article, “The Power of Government to Regulate Class Discrimination by Religious Entities: A Study in Conflicting Values,” see 43 Emory L.J. 1189 (1994). For comment, “Deeper into the Political Thicket: Racial and Political Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court,” see 43 Emory L.J. 1519 (1994). For article, “Annual Eleventh Circuit Survey January 1, 1993 — December 31, 1993: Constitutional Civil Law,” see 45 Mercer L. Rev. 1217 (1994). For article, “Annual Eleventh Circuit Survey January 1, 1993 — December 31, 1993: Constitutional Criminal Law,” see 45 Mercer L. Rev. 1243 (1994). For annual survey article on criminal law and procedure, see 46 Mercer L. Rev. 153 (1994). For comment, “Is Georgia’s Stalking Law Unconstitutionally Vague?,” see 45 Mercer L. Rev. 853 (1994). For article, “Liberty and the Constitution,” see 29 Ga. L. Rev. 585 (1995). For note, “Substantive Due Process Limits on Public Officials’ Power to Terminate State-Created Property Interests,” see 29 Ga. L. Rev. 769 (1995). For note, “Who Drew Congressional District Lines: The Georgia General Assembly or the United States Department of Justice?,” see 11 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 381 (1995). For article, “1994 Eleventh Circuit Survey: Constitutional Civil Law,” see 46 Mercer L. Rev. 1275 (1995). For article, “The Harlan Dissent: The Road Not Taken — An American Tragedy,” see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 951 (1996). For article, “Only Partially Color-Blind: John Marshall Harlan’s View of Race and the Constitution,” see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 973 (1996). For article, “The Ghosts of Homer Plessy,” see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1037 (1996). For article, “Segregating the New South: The Origins and Legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson,” see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1017 (1996). For article, “Plessy’s Legacy: Desegre-gating the Eurocentric Curriculum,” see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1151 (1996). For note, “What Constitutes Minimum Contact in Cyberspace After CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson: Are New Rules Necessary for a New Regime?,” see 13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 521 (1996). For survey of 1995 Eleventh Circuit cases on constitutional civil law, see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 745 (1996). For survey of 1995 Eleventh Circuit cases on employment discrimination, see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 797 (1996). For survey of 1995 Eleventh Circuit cases on evidence, see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 837 (1996). For survey of 1995 Eleventh Circuit cases on federal sentencing guidelines, see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 851 (1996). For note, “United States v. Hays: A Winnowing of Standing to Sue in Racial Gerrymandering Claims,” see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 955 (1996). For note, “Arizonia v. Evans: Carving Out Another Good-Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule,” see 47 Mercer L. Rev. 1135 (1996). For comment on the right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings, see 47 Emory L.J. 1079 (1998). For comment, “Taking Steps to Protect Private Property and Endangered Species: Constitutional Implications of Habi-tat Conservation Planning After Dolan v. Tigard,” see 47 Emory L.J. 311 (1998). For article, “The Gift of Hopwood: Diversity and the Fife and Drum March Back to the Nineteenth Century,” see 34 Ga. L. Rev. 291 (1999). For article, “Employment Law Responsibilities of Public Employers in Georgia,” see 5 Ga. St. B.J. 10 (1999). For article, “Why Georgia’s Child Support Guidelines Are Unconstitutional,” see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 8 (2000). For article, “Constitutionally Sound Objectives and Means,” see 6 Ga. St. B.J. 16 (2000). For article, “Three Arguments Against Mt. Healthy: Tort Theory, Constitutional Torts, and Freedom of Speech,” see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 583 (2000). For article, “Mt. Healthy and Causa-tion-in-Fact: The Court Still Doesn’t Get It!,” see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 603 (2000). For article, “An Essay on Texas v. Les-age,” see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 621 (2000). For article, “Mt. Healthy, Causation, and Affirmative Defenses,” see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 637 (2000). For article surveying 1999 Eleventh Circuit cases involving constitutional criminal procedure, see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 1089 (2000). For article surveying 1999 Eleventh Circuit cases on federal sentencing guidelines, see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 1189 (2000). For article, “Campbell v. Georgia: Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Survives Separation of Power Attacks, Remaining a Viable Option for the Legislature in Its War on Crime,” see 17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 637 (2001). For comment, “Apprendi v. New Jersey: Should Any Factual Determination Authorizing an Increase in a Criminal Defendant’s Sentence be Proven to a Jury Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?,” see 52 Mercer L. Rev. 1531 (2001). For comment, “A Back Door Solution: Steinberg v. Carhart and the Answer to the Casey/Salerno Dilemma for Facial Challenges to Abortion Statutes,” see 50 Emory L. Rev. 873 (2001). For note, “Giving Taxpatriates the Boot-permanently?: The Reed Amendment Unconstitutionally Infringes on the Fundamental Right to Expatriate,” see 36 Ga. L. Rev. 835 (2002). For note, “When Parental Rights and Children’s Best Interests Collide: An Examination of Troxel v. Granville as It Relates to Gay and Lesbian Families,” see 19 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2002). For article, “Statutory Civil Rights,” see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 1499 (2002). For note, “Which Stream to Follow: Why the Eleventh Circuit Should Adopt a Broader Stream of Commerce Theory in Light of Growing E-Commerce Markets,” see 20 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 539 (2003). For article, “Why Punitive Damages Are Unconstitutional,” see 53 Emory L.J. 1 (2004). For article, “Arbitration and the Batson Principle,” see 38 Ga. L. Rev. 1145 (2004). For article, “The Affirmative Action Debate Continues: Bakke and Its Progeny Revisited,” see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 24 (2004). For note, “Whoa, Slow Down! Applying the Constitutional Brakes to Accelerated Punitive Damages Awards,” see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 835 (2004). For comment, “A Deep Breath Before the Plunge: Undoing Miranda’s Failure Before It’s Too Late,” see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 1375 (2004). For article, “Constitutional Interpretation, Coercive Interrogation, and Civil Rights Litigation after Chavez v. Martinez,” see 39 Ga. L. Rev. 733 (2005). For article, “Data Matching, Data Mining, and Due Process,” see 40 Ga. L. Rev. 85 (2005). For article, “General Intangible or Commercial Tort: Moral Rights and State-Based Intellectual Property as Collateral under U.C.C. Revised Article 9,” see 22 Bank. Dev. J. 95 (2005). For comment, “Thou Shalt Not Reorga-nize: Sacraments for Sale First Amendment Prohibitions and Other Complica-tions of Chapter 11 Reorganization for Religious Institutions,” see 22 Bank. Dev. J. 293 (2005). For article, “Women and Law: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Indian Supreme Courts’ Equality Jurisprudence,” see 34 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 557 (2006). For article, “Police Pursuits: A Comprehensive Look at the Broad Spectrum of Police Pursuit Liability and Law,” see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 511 (2006). For article, “Sex Equality Arguments for Reproductive Rights: Their Critical Basis and Evolving Constitutional Expression,” see 56 Emory L.J. 815 (2007). For article, “How New Genetic Technologies Will Transform Roe v. Wade,” see 56 Emory L.J. 843 (2007). For article, “Abortion, Equality, and Administrative Regulation,” see 56 Emory L.J. 865 (2007). For article, “The Unitary Fourteenth Amendment,” see 56 Emory L.J. 907 (2007). For article, “The Next Step After Roe: Using Fundamental Rights, Equal Protection Analysis to Nullify Restrictive State-Level Abortion Legislation,” see 56 Emory L.J. 1173 (2007). For article, “Lawrence v. Geduldig: Regulating Women’s Sexuality,” see 56 Emory L.J. 1235 (2007). For article, “A Comparative Analysis of Unconscious and Institutional Discrimination in the United States and Britain,” see 36 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 89 (2007). For article, “Redefining the Right to Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights and the Constitutionality of Technical Surveillance Measures in Germany and the United States,” see 35 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 433 (2007). For note, “Official, National, Common or Unifying: Do Words Giving Legal Status to Language Diminish Linguistic Human Rights?,” see 36 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 221 (2007). For comment, “Due Process Problems Caused by Large Disparities in Grants of Asylum: Will New Department of Justice Recommendations Solve the Problem?,” see 22 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 385 (2008). For comment, “‘An Era of Human Zoning’: Banning Sex Offenders from Communities Through Residence and Work Restrictions,” see 57 Emory L.J. 1347 (2008). For article, “Due Process Rights Before EU Agencies: The Rights of Defense,” see 37 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 1 (2008). For article, “Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Equal Protection: An Examination of Context,” see 13 Ga. St. B.J. 16 (2008). For article, “An Originalist Defense of Substantive Due Process: Magna Carta, Higher-Law Constitutionalism, and the Fifth Amendment,” see 58 Emory L.J. 585 (2009). For comment, “You’ve Got Libel: How the Can-Spam Act Delivers Defamation Liability to Spam-Fighters and Why the First Amendment Should Delete the Problem,” see 58 Emory L.J. 1013 (2009). For comment, “Pinpoint Redistricting and the Minimization of Partisan Gerrymandering,” see 59 Emory L.J. 211 (2009). For comment, “I Object: The RLUIPA as a Model for Protecting the Conscience Rights of Religious Objectors to Same-Sex Relationships,” see 59 Emory L.J. 259 (2009). For article, “Mining for Gold: The Constitutional Court of South Africa’s Experience with Comparative Constitutional Law,” see 37 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 219 (2009). For article, “The Public’s Domain in Trademark Law: A First Amendment Theory of the Consumer,” see 43 Ga. L. Rev. 451 (2009). For article, “The Original Meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause,” see 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1117 (2009). For article, “State-Created Property and Due Process of Law: Filling the Void Left by Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture,” see 44 Ga. L. Rev. 161 (2009). For note, “‘Rabbit’ Hunting in the Supreme Court: The Constitutionality of State Prohibitions of Sex Toy Sales Following Lawrence v. Texas,” see 44 Ga. L. Rev. 245 (2009). For article, “Substantive Due Process Rediscovered: The Rise and Fall of Liberty of Contract,” see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 563 (2009). For annual survey on zoning and land use law, see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 427 (2009). For article, “Conditional Rules in Criminal Procedure: Alice in Wonderland Meets the Constitution,” see 26 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 417 (2010). For note, “Extra! ReadAllAbout It: Why Notice by Newspaper Publication Fails to Meet Mullane’s Desire to Inform Standard and How Modern Technology Provides a Viable Alternative,” see 45 Ga. L. Rev. 1095 (2011). For article, “Pensions and Chapter 9: Can Municipalities Use Bankruptcy to Solve Their Pension Woes?,” see 27 Emory Bankr. Dev. J. 365 (2011). For article, “Gelding the Lily: How the Bankruptcy Code’s Promotion of Marriage Leaves it Impotent,” see 28 Emory Bankr. Dev. J. 31 (2011). For article, “Education: (Re)Considering Race in the Desegregation of Higher Education,” see 46 Ga. L. Rev. 521 (2012). For article, “Education: Education’s Elusive Future, Storied Past, and the Fundamental Inequities Between,” see 46 Ga. L. Rev. 557 (2012). For comment, “Equal Protection for Transgendered Employees? Analyzing the Court’s Call for More than Rational Basis in the Glenn v. Brumby Decision,” see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1315 (2012). For annual survey on criminal law, see 64 Mercer L. Rev. 83 (2012). For article, “Having it Both Ways: How Charter Schools Try to Obtain Funding of Public Schools and the Autonomy of Private Schools,” see 63 Emory L. J. 303 (2013). For article, “Symposium on Evidence Reform: Judicial Gatekeeping of Suspect Evidence: Due Process and Evidentiary Rules in the Age of Innocence,” 47 Ga. L. Rev. 723 (2013). For article, “Courts: Juvenile Justice Reform,” see 30 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 63 (2013). For article, “(Mis)Conceptions of the Corporation,” see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 731 (2013). For article, “Commerce, Death Panels, and Broccoli: or Why the Activity/Inactiv-ity Distinction in the Health Care Case was Really About the Right to Bodily Integrity,” see 29 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 897 (2013). For comment, “A Father’s Right to Counsel in Georgia Juvenile Court Legitimation Proceedings: Closing the Due Process Loophole,” see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 865 (2013). For comment, “Drawing the Line: DNA Databasing at Arrest and Sample Ex-pungement,” see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1063 (2013). For comment, “The Unconstitutional Torture of an American by the U.S. Military: Is there a Remedy Under Bivens?,” see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1093 (2013). For article, “Disability Constitutional Law,” see 63 Emory L.J. 527 (2014). For article, “Jurisdictional Discrimination and Full Faith and Credit,” see 63 Emory L. J. 1023 (2014). For article, “Sentencing Adjudication: Lessons from Child Pornography Policy Nullification,” see 30 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 375 (2014). For article, “Polygamous Unions? Charting the Contours of Marriage Law’s Frontier,” see 64 Emory L.J. 1669 (2015). For article, “Why Two In One Flesh? The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy,” see 64 Emory L.J. 1675 (2015). For article, “Should Civil Marriage Be Opened Up to Multiple Parties,” see 64 Emory L.J. 1747 (2015). For article, “Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage,” see 64 Emory L.J. 1977 (2015). For article, “The Evolution of Plural Parentage Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage,” see 64 Emory L.J. 2047 (2015). For article, “Polygyny and Violence Against Women,” see 64 Emory L.J. 1767 (2015). For comment, “L’Amour for Four: Polygyny, Polyamory, and the State’s Compelling Economic Interest in Normative Monogamy,” see 64 Emory L.J. 2093 (2015). For article, “Original Misunderstand-ings: The Implications of Misreading History in Jones,” see 31 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 471 (2015). For article, “Diversity, Democracy & Pluralism: Confronting the Reality of Our Inequality,” see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 577 (2015). For comment, “The Guiding Hand of Counsel: Effective Representation for Indigent Defendants in the Cordele Judicial Circuit,” see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 781 (2015). For comment, “The Pursuit of Happiness (and Sexual Freedom): Lawrence v. Texas, Morality Legislation & the Sandy Springs Obscenity Statute,” see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 1087 (2015). For article, “Freedom of Conscience in War Time: World War I and the Limits of Civil Liberties,” see 65 Emory L.J. 1051 (2016). For article, “Secret Jurisdiction,” see 65 Emory L.J. 1313 (2016). For comment, “Too Far From Home: Why Daimler’s ‘At Home’ Standard Does Not Apply to Personal Jurisdiction Challenges in Anti-Terrorism Act Cases,” see 66 Emory L.J. 161 (2016). For article, “What Is (And Isn’t) Health-ism,” see 50 Ga. L. Rev. 833 (2016). For note, “A Most Precious Right: Equal Protection, Voter Photo Identification, and the Battle Brewing in Texas,” see 51 Ga. L. Rev. 235 (2016). For comment, “Affiliative Discrimination Theory: Title VII Litigation Within the Sixth Circuit,” see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 541 (2016). For comment, “Georgia’s Policies Regarding High School Special Education Diplomas: Are Too Many Children Left Behind?,” see 32 Georgia St. U.L. Rev. 755 (2016). For article, “The Odd Couple: How Justices Kennedy and Scalia, Together, Advanced Gay Rights in Romer v. Evans,” see 67 Mercer L. Rev. 305 (2016). For article, “Annual Survey of Georgia Law: June 1, 2015 — May 31, 2016: Special Contribution: Georgia’s Safe Harbor Ruling for Affirmative Defenses in Criminal Cases Should Be Revisited,” see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 35 (2016). For article, “Originalism and Level of Generality,” see 51 Ga. L. Rev. 485 (2017). For article, “Disparate Impact in Big Data Policing,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 109 (2017). For note, “An Aggravating Adolescence: An Analysis of Juvenile Convictions as Statutory Aggravators in Capital Cases,” see 51 Ga. L. Rev. 673 (2017). For article, “Injustice Under Law: Perpetuating and Criminalizing Poverty Through the Courts,” see 33 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 695 (2017). For note, “A Promise Unfulfilled: Challenges to Georgia’s Death Penalty Statute Post Furman,” see 33 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 839 (2017). For article, “Compliance Requires Inspection: The Failure of Gender Equal Pay Efforts in the United States,” see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 445 (2017). For note, “Methamphetamine, Money, and a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel: United States v. Jimenez-Antunez All Boils Down to the Appropriate Standard,” see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 909 (2017). For article, “Revisionist Municipal Liability,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 375 (2018). For article, “Walking the Line: Modern Gerrymandering and Partisanship,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 1011 (2018). For article, “The First Amendment Case Against Partisan Gerrymandering,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 1042 (2018). For article, “The History of Redistricting in Georgia,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 1060 (2018). For article, “Constitutional Preservation and the Judicial Review of Partisan Gerrymanders,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 1108 (2018). For note, “Bailing on Bail: The Unconstitutionality of Fixed, Monetary Bail Systems and Their Continued Use Throughout the United States,” see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 985 (2018). For note, “Detainee Transfers and Immigration Judges: ICE Forum-Shopping Tactics in Removal Proceedings,” see 53 Ga. L. Rev. 283 (2018). For article, “Dead Canaries in the Coal Mines: The Symbolic Assailant Revisited,” see 34 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 513 (2018). For article, “From the Crime Scene to the Courtroom: The Future of Forensic Science Reform: The First Amendment Case for Public Access to Secret Algo-rithms Used in Criminal Trials,” see 34 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 915 (2018). For article on alcoholic beverages, see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2018). For note, “Big Brother is Watching: When Should Georgia Get Involved in Issues of Family Privacy to Protect Children’s Liberties?,” see 34 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 819 (2018). For article, “Racial Justice and Federal Habeas Corpus as Postconviction Relief from State Convictions,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 453 (2018). For article, “Participatory Defense: Hu-manizing the Accused and Ceding Control to the Client,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 715 (2018). For article, “Privileging Public Defense Research,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 771 (2018). For article, “Black and White Make Gray: Common Cause v. Kemp, What’s the Trigger for Purging Voters?,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 947 (2018). For article, “Federal Income Taxation,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 1167 (2018). For annual survey on healthcare law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 1209 (2018). For article, “National Personal Jurisdiction,” see 68 Emory L.J. 509 (2019). For article, “National Personal Jurisdiction,” see 68 Emory L.J. 511 (2019). For article, “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Constitutionalization of Statistics,” see 68 Emory L.J. 979 (2019). For article, “Coerced Choice: School Vouchers and Students with Disabilities,” see 68 Emory L.J. 1037 (2019). For article, “Why (Jury-Less) Juvenile Courts are Unconstitutional,” see 69 Emory L.J. 273 (2019). For comment, “‘A Fresh Look’: Title VII’s New Promise for LGBT Discrimination Protection Post-Hively,” see 68 Emory L.J. 1101 (2019). For comment, “Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer: Playing ‘In the Joints’ and on the Playground,” see 68 Emory L.J. 1147 (2019). For comment, “Paving a Path Between the Campus and the Chapel: A Revised Section 501(c)(3) Standard for Determining Tax Exemptions,” see 69 Emory L.J. 321 (2019). For comment, “Pre-Adjudication Access to Counsel for Juveniles,” see 69 Emory L.J. 359 (2019). For article, “Age, Time, and Discrimination,” see 53 Ga. L. Rev. 845 (2019). For article, “Assessing the Impact of Police Body Camera Evidence on the Litigation of Excessive Force Cases,” see 54 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2019). For article, “Back to the Drawing Board! Legislating Hollywood: A Regulation that Resolves the Film Industry’s Conflict Between the First and Fourteenth Amendments,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 605 (2019). For article, “Transcript: Abortion and Gay Rights,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 871 (2019). For article, “Transcript: Federalism and Separation of Powers,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1003 (2019). For note, “No Place for Speech Zones: How Colleges Engage in Expressive Gerrymandering,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 387 (2019). For note, “Partisan Gerrymandering and Georgia: Red, White, and Blue or Just Red and Blue?,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 487 (2019). For note, “Addressing Racial Bias in the Jury System: Another Failed Attempt?,” see 35 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 843 (2019). For article, “A Constitutional Counter-punch to Georgia’s Anti-SLAPP Statute,” see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 407 (2019). For article, “Integrated Water Resources Management and Effective Intergovernmental Cooperation on Watershed Issues,” see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 399 (2019). For article, “The Social Costs of Regulatory Takings,” see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 479 (2019). For article, “The Heavy Burden of Thin Regulation: Lessons Learned from the SEC’s Regulation of Cryptocurrencies,” see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 615 (2019). For note, “(I Can’t Get No) Habeas Relief, Cause I Try, and I Try, and I Try, and I Try,” see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 1135 (2019). For comment, “Is There a Georgia Supreme Court, Problem? Analyzing the Georgia Supreme Court’s New Peculiar Approach Towards Breathalyzers and Implied Consent Law,” see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 393 (2019). For comment, “Under Kemp’s Eye: Analyzing the Constitutionality of the Heart-beat Restriction in Georgia’s LIFE Act and its Potential Impact on Abortion Law,” see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 417 (2019). For article, “Discriminatory Dualism,” see 54 Ga. L. Rev. 869 (2020). For article, “The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Federal Elections, and State Constitutions,” see 55 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2020). For note, “Pretrial Detention of Indigents: A Standard Analysis of Due Process and Equal Protection Claims,” see 54 Ga. L. Rev. 707 (2020). For note, “Georgia’s Runoff Election System Has Run Its Course,” see 54 Ga. L. Rev. 1063 (2020). For note, “The Georgia Condominium Act’s Authorization of Private Takings: Revisiting Kelo and ‘Bitter with the Sweet,”’ see 55 Ga. L. Rev. 395 (2020). For article, “Elections: Elections and Primaries Through the Pandemic,” see 37 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 241 (2020). For note, “Breaking the Binary: Desegregation of Bathrooms,” see 36 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 381 (2020). For article, “To Tax or Not to Tax: State Income Tax on Trusts After North Carolina Department of Revenue v. The Kim-berly Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust,” see 25 Ga. St. B.J 26 (Feb. 2020). For note, “Election Spotlight: Nearly Twenty Years After Hanging Chads, Problems Persist in Florida,” see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 895 (2020). For note, “Shoot at Me Once: Shame on You! Shoot at Me Twice: Qualified Immunity. Qualified Immunity Applies Where Police Target Innocent Bystanders,” see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 1171 (2020). For comment, “Voter Suppression Post-Shelby: Impacts and Issues of Voter Purge and Voter ID Laws,” see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 857 (2020). For article, “Where is the Strike Zone? Arguing for a Uniformly Narrow Interpretation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s ‘Three Strikes’ Rule,” see 70 Emory L.J. 755 (2021). For article, “How the Fourth Amendment Frustrates the Regulation of Police Violence,” see 70 Emory L.J. 521 (2021). For note, “Who Calls the Shots?: Parents Versus the Parens Patriae Power of the States to Mandate Vaccines for Children in New York,” see 37 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 637 (2021). For article, “At Bat in the Batson Box, Again: An Updated Guide to Non-Discriminatory Jury Selection in Georgia,” see 26 Ga. St. B.J. 19 (Feb. 2021). For article with annual survey on local government, see 73 Mercer L. Rev. 193 (2021). For article with annual survey on torts, see 73 Mercer L. Rev. 243 (2021). For note, “Jus Sanguinis or Just Plain Discrimination? Rejecting a Biological Requirement for Birthright Citizenship of Children Born Abroad to Same-Sex Couples Vis Assisted Reproductive Technology,” see 56 Ga. L. Rev. 1245 (2022). For comment, “A Child’s Constitutional Right to Family Integrity and Counsel in Dependency Proceedings,” see 72 Emory L.J. 911 (2023). For article, “The Literary Language of Privacy How Judges’ Use of Literature Reveals Images of Privacy in the Law,” see 39 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 645 (2023). For article, “The Problem of Extrava-gant Inferences,” see 58 Ga. L. Rev. 467 (2024). For note, “The Georgian Case for Harmless Constitutional Error Reform,” see 40 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 757 (2024). For article, “Neuropsychological Malingering Determination: The Illusion of scientific Lie Detection,” see 58 Ga. L. Rev. 483 (2024). For article, “Built Binary: Rethinking the Incarceration of Transgender Individuals Within a Dual Gendered Prison System,” see 58 Ga. L. Rev. 1307 (2024).