Georgia Commons

Supreme Court of Georgia · criminal appeal

State v. Williams

Filed April 8, 2025 · Docket S25A0250 · 321 Ga. 375

The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld orders granting new trials to two men convicted of murder and other crimes, ruling that the trial judge improperly told the jury that three witnesses were the defendants' accomplices.

In plain language

Jalontaye Cleveland and Courtney Williams were convicted by a Muscogee County jury of murder and other crimes tied to a string of gas station robberies, including a shooting that killed Vatsal Patel. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that three witnesses who had pleaded guilty and testified against the men were 'accomplices' to specific counts. After the verdicts, both men argued this instruction violated a Georgia law barring judges from commenting on a defendant's guilt, because calling someone an accomplice necessarily means the defendant was also a participant in the crime. The trial court agreed and granted new trials. The State appealed, arguing that other parts of the jury instructions fixed any problem. The Supreme Court of Georgia disagreed, holding that naming the witnesses as accomplices amounted to the judge expressing an opinion on guilt, which requires automatic reversal under the statute regardless of other instructions given.

What the court decided

placeholder

Why it matters

why_it_matters_placeholder

Outcome

Affirmed

How the court got there

  1. placeholder

Topics

  • placeholder

Ask about this case

Answers come from this document. Not legal advice.

State v. Williams | Georgia Commons