Skip to content
Georgia Commons
Menu

One of several opinions in docket S16Y0723. The docket address /opinions/S16Y0723 shows the most recent.

Supreme Court of Georgia · bar discipline

In the Matter of Shanina Nashae Lank

Filed June 16, 2026 · Docket S16Y0723, S16Y0724, S16Y0725

The Supreme Court of Georgia reinstated attorney Shanina Nashae Lank to practice law after the State Bar confirmed she had met all conditions the court had previously set for her return.

Read the full opinion text

These buttons carry the court's own opinion, not the summaries below. Copy for LLM, View as markdown, and Send to AI use the Markdown version: the opinion as the court wrote it, then the summaries under a heading that names them as ours. View raw is the opinion alone.

The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the opinion and are not part of it. Quote the opinion, not the summary.

In plain language

This case involves Shanina Nashae Lank, a Georgia attorney who had been suspended from practicing law under conditions the Supreme Court of Georgia set out in an earlier 2017 decision. The State Bar of Georgia's Office of the General Counsel filed a notice confirming that she had satisfied those conditions for reinstatement. Based on that notice, the Supreme Court of Georgia found that Lank had met the requirements and ordered that she be reinstated to practice law in the State of Georgia. All the Justices agreed with the decision.

What the court decided

The court held that because the State Bar confirmed Lank had satisfied the reinstatement conditions set in its earlier order, she is entitled to be reinstated to practice law in Georgia.

Why it matters

The order allows Lank to resume practicing law in Georgia, restoring her ability to represent clients. It also shows how the State Bar's disciplinary and reinstatement process works, giving suspended attorneys a clear path back to practice once they meet court-ordered conditions.

Outcome

Reinstated

How the court got there

  1. The court had previously imposed specific conditions Lank needed to meet before she could return to practicing law, as set out in an earlier ruling, In the Matter of Lank, 300 Ga. 479 (2017).
  2. The State Bar of Georgia's Office of the General Counsel, the body that oversees attorney discipline, submitted a notice confirming Lank had completed those conditions.
  3. Relying on that confirmation, the court concluded Lank had satisfied the requirements for reinstatement and ordered her restored to the practice of law.

Topics

  • attorney reinstatement
  • State Bar of Georgia
  • law license

Ask about this case

Answers come from this document. Not legal advice.

Machine-readable https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S16Y0723/10975766.md · https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp