---
title: POLLARD v. COOPER
collection: opinions
id: S25A0278
cite_as: POLLARD v. COOPER, S25A0278 (Ga. Mar. 4, 2025)
canonical_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25A0278
md_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25A0278.md
text_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25A0278/text
source_url: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10349385/pollard-v-cooper/
date: 2025-03-04
status: published
corpus_version: opinions-2026-09-14
license: Public record of the Supreme Court of Georgia, via CourtListener and the court's own website; see about.md
publisher: Georgia Commons, an independent project of Georgia Civic Data. Not the State of Georgia. Not legal advice.
up: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/2025.md
previous: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S24C1320.md
next: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S24A1024.md
index: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/index.md
omitted: opinion extras
omitted_chars: 817
omitted_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25A0278.md?full=1
docket: S25A0278
court: Supreme Court of Georgia
case_type: civil
authoring_justice: Per Curiam
disposition: Affirmed without opinion
vote: All the Justices concur
word_count: 118
date_filed_source: courtlistener
record_source: courtlistener
legal_areas:
  - civil procedure
upstream_id: "10349385"
summaries_model: claude-sonnet-5
---

# POLLARD v. COOPER

Supreme Court of Georgia, docket S25A0278, filed 2025-03-04.

## Opinion

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: March 4, 2025

S25A0278. POLLARD et al. v. COOPER et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion

pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.

## Summaries written by Georgia Commons

The following was written by claude-sonnet-5 from the opinion above and is not part of the court's opinion. Quote the opinion, not the summary.

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed a lower court's ruling in a dispute between the Pollards and Coopers without issuing a written explanation, using a court rule that allows summary affirmances.

### Plain-language summary

This case involved a dispute between a group identified as Pollard and others against a group identified as Cooper and others. The opinion does not describe the underlying facts or legal issues, because the Supreme Court of Georgia chose to resolve the appeal through a short order rather than a full written opinion.
Under Supreme Court Rule 59, the court can affirm a lower court's decision without explaining its reasoning when it finds no need for a detailed opinion. Here, the court used that rule to affirm the judgment below, meaning the losing party's appeal did not succeed and the lower court's ruling stands as issued.

### Holding, as summarized

The court affirmed the lower court's judgment without a written opinion, relying on Supreme Court Rule 59, which permits summary affirmance when the court determines no opinion is necessary to explain the outcome.

### Disposition

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.

### Why it matters

For the parties involved, this ends the appeal and leaves the lower court's judgment in place. For the public, it illustrates how the Supreme Court of Georgia can resolve some appeals quickly, without a detailed opinion explaining its reasoning.

> The summarized reasoning, checked quotes, suggested questions, and the CourtListener opinion records (817 characters) are at https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25A0278.md?full=1