---
title: Choudhary v. Ogles et al.
collection: opinions
id: S26A1023
cite_as: Choudhary v. Ogles et al., S26A1023 (Ga. Aug. 11, 2026)
canonical_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26A1023
md_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26A1023.md
text_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26A1023/text
source_url: https://www.gasupreme.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/s26a1023.pdf
date: 2026-08-11
status: published
corpus_version: opinions-2026-09-14
license: Public record of the Supreme Court of Georgia, via CourtListener and the court's own website; see about.md
publisher: Georgia Commons, an independent project of Georgia Civic Data. Not the State of Georgia. Not legal advice.
up: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/2026.md
previous: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S25G1418.md
next: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26G0149.md
index: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/index.md
omitted: opinion extras
omitted_chars: 1120
omitted_url: https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26A1023.md?full=1
docket: S26A1023
court: Supreme Court of Georgia
case_type: civil
case_name_full: Shazia Zahoor Choudhary v. Jonathan Paul Ogles et al.
authoring_justice: Per Curiam
disposition: Affirmed without opinion
vote: All the Justices concur
word_count: 133
date_filed_source: courtlistener
record_source: gasupreme
legal_areas:
  - civil procedure
upstream_id: ga-s26a1023
summaries_model: claude-sonnet-5
---

# Choudhary v. Ogles et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia, docket S26A1023, filed 2026-08-11.

## Opinion

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

No. S26A1023

Shazia Zahoor Choudhary

v.

Jonathan Paul Ogles et al.

On Appeal from the Superior Court of Bibb County

No. 2023CV079324

Decided: August 11, 2026

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opin- ion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.

## Summaries written by Georgia Commons

The following was written by claude-sonnet-5 from the opinion above and is not part of the court's opinion. Quote the opinion, not the summary.

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed a Bibb County trial court's decision in a civil dispute without issuing a written explanation, using a court rule that lets it dispose of appeals without a full opinion.

### Plain-language summary

This case came to the Supreme Court of Georgia as an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court of Bibb County involving Shazia Zahoor Choudhary and Jonathan Paul Ogles and others. The opinion does not describe the underlying facts or legal arguments.
Under Supreme Court Rule 59, the court is permitted to affirm a lower court's ruling without writing a full explanatory opinion when it finds no need to elaborate on the reasoning. Here, the court used that rule to affirm the Bibb County trial court's judgment, meaning that decision stands. All Justices agreed with this outcome.

### Holding, as summarized

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the trial court's judgment without explanation, exercising its authority under Supreme Court Rule 59 to dispose of an appeal without issuing a full written opinion when it determines no opinion is necessary.

### Disposition

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.

### Why it matters

For the parties involved, this ends the appeal and leaves the Bibb County trial court's ruling in place. Because no written reasoning was issued, the decision does not create guidance for future litigants or lawyers facing similar disputes in Georgia courts.

> The summarized reasoning, checked quotes, suggested questions (1,120 characters) are at https://georgiacommons.org/opinions/S26A1023.md?full=1