House · Passed · 2025-2026 Regular Session
HB 1569: McDonough, City of; Municipal Court; authorize assessment and collection of a technology fee
Last action May 11, 2026 · Effective Date
A bill covering only the City of McDonough would let its Municipal Court add up to a $15 technology fee to criminal fines, with the money earmarked for court and public safety technology.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
This bill applies only to the Municipal Court of the City of McDonough. It authorizes the court clerk to charge a technology fee, set by the municipal court judge, of up to $15.00 on every criminal and quasi-criminal fine paid to the court. The fee is a surcharge on top of any other fines or fees already required by law. The money collected must be kept in a separate account managed by the city's chief financial officer or finance director along with the court clerk, and spent only on court and public safety technology such as computer hardware and software, evidence management systems, body cameras, license plate readers, drones, and similar equipment. Funds can also reimburse the city's IT department for services to the court or public safety. The fee only applies when a case ends in conviction, a no-contest plea, or final disposition; it cannot be charged if a case is dismissed or dropped (nolle prossed).
What the bill does
- Authorizes the Municipal Court of the City of McDonough to charge a technology fee of up to $15.00 as a surcharge on criminal and quasi-criminal fines.
- Restricts use of the fee revenue to specific technology purposes, including computer equipment, software subscriptions, body and vehicle cameras, license plate readers, and drones.
- Requires the collected funds to be kept in a segregated city account separate from other city funds, managed by the finance director and court clerk.
- Allows the funds to reimburse the city's information technology department for services provided to the court or public safety operations.
- Bars the fee from being charged in cases that are dismissed or nolle prossed, limiting it to convictions, no-contest pleas, or final case dispositions.
Who it affects
People convicted of criminal or quasi-criminal offenses in the Municipal Court of the City of McDonough, who would pay the added fee on top of their fine. It also affects the McDonough municipal court clerk, city finance officials, and the city's information technology and public safety departments.
Why it matters
Anyone fined in McDonough's municipal court would pay up to $15 more, funding technology like body cameras and license plate readers for local courts and police. The measure applies only within this one city and does not change fees or procedures anywhere else in Georgia.
Key provisions
- Section 1(a) sets the fee ceiling at $15.00 per fine and lists six categories of technology purchases the money can fund, from general IT equipment to drones and license plate readers.
- Section 1(b) requires the funds to be held in a segregated account controlled by the city's finance officer and court clerk, spent only with direction from the mayor or city administrator.
- Section 1(c) limits when the fee can be assessed, excluding dismissed or nolle prossed cases and making clear it is an addition to existing fines.
- Section 2 repeals any conflicting laws.
From the bill
“an amount not to exceed $15.00 as a surcharge to each criminal and quasi-criminal fine paid to the court”
“No fee shall be assessed for cases that are dismissed or nolle prossed.”
Discussed in meetings (4)
The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.
House floor session, March 27, 2026 (legislative day 38, part 1)
From 0:36:37 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 3289
Summary by Georgia Commons: The clerk read a favorable committee report for HB 1569 and later listed it as a McDonough measure on the uncontested local calendar. No individual presentation or debate followed. The House passed the local calendar, including this bill, 153-0.
Status timeline
- Effective Date
- Act 601
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted (House)
Show full history (13 actions)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Mary Ann Santos (D, HD-117)
- Noelle Kahaian (R, HD-81)
Votes
- House voteMarch 27, 2026
153 yea, 0 nay (20 not voting, 3 excused)
- Senate voteApril 2, 2026
49 yea, 0 nay (3 not voting, 2 excused)
Topics
- municipal court fees
- McDonough Georgia
- local government funding
- court technology
- public safety technology