House · Passed · 2025-2026 Regular Session
HB 161: Georgia Bureau of Investigation; authority to issue subpoenas of electronic communication records for purposes of investigating certain cyber enabled threats to life and property; provide
Last action July 1, 2025 · Effective Date
House Bill 161 expands the Georgia Bureau of Investigation's power to subpoena electronic communication records in more types of criminal investigations and rewrites the state's domestic terrorism law to make it a standalone crime with added penalties for ignoring GBI subpoenas.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
Currently, the GBI can subpoena electronic communication providers (like phone or internet companies) for subscriber records only in investigations involving certain child exploitation crimes or gang activity. This bill broadens that subpoena power to cover investigations of several other crimes, including terroristic threats, criminal damage to critical infrastructure, and the new domestic terrorism offense. It also makes it easier to punish someone for refusing to comply with such a subpoena by explicitly authorizing courts to treat noncompliance as contempt of court, and it bars companies from telling a subscriber that a subpoena has been issued while an investigation is pending. Separately, the bill restructures Georgia's domestic terrorism law. Instead of defining 'domestic terrorism' in one code section (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-220) and setting penalties in another (§ 16-11-221), the bill moves the actual definition of the crime into § 16-11-221 itself, adds a definition of 'assassination,' and makes conforming updates to related statutes on sanctuary policies and the Board of Homeland Security so they reference the new crime section.
What the bill does
- Expands the list of crimes for which the GBI director or deputy director can subpoena electronic communication or remote computing service records to include terroristic threats, damage to critical infrastructure, and other specified offenses.
- Allows a court to treat a person's refusal to obey a GBI subpoena for these records as contempt of court, creating a clearer enforcement mechanism.
- Bars phone and internet service providers from notifying a subscriber that GBI issued a subpoena for their records while a criminal investigation is pending.
- Removes the definition of 'domestic terrorism' from O.C.G.A. § 16-11-220 and instead defines the crime directly within the penalty section, O.C.G.A. § 16-11-221.
- Adds a new definition of 'assassination' to Georgia's domestic terrorism statute, meaning the intentional killing of an elected official to prevent or retaliate for official duties.
- Updates references to domestic terrorism in Georgia's sanctuary policy laws, racketeering law, and Board of Homeland Security definitions so they point to the new crime section instead of the old definition section.
Who it affects
This bill affects the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and its investigators, phone and internet service providers who must respond to subpoenas, people under criminal investigation whose communication records could be subpoenaed, local governments enforcing sanctuary policy laws, and anyone charged under Georgia's domestic terrorism or racketeering statutes.
Why it matters
Investigators would be able to obtain phone and internet subscriber records more quickly in a wider range of cases, including threats to infrastructure, without tipping off the subject during an active investigation. The domestic terrorism law becomes a clearer, standalone criminal offense rather than a definition paired with a separate penalty section, which could affect how prosecutors bring and courts interpret such charges.
Key provisions
- Section 1-1 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 35-3-4.1 to expand GBI subpoena authority to investigations of Code Sections 16-9-93, 16-10-28, 16-11-37, 16-11-39.1, and 16-11-221, in addition to the existing child exploitation and gang-related offenses.
- Section 1-1 adds that failure to obey a subpoena issued under this section may be punished as contempt of court.
- Section 1-1 adds a new rule that the issuance of a subpoena cannot be made public during a pending investigation or prosecution beyond what is necessary to issue and comply with it.
- Section 2-1 removes the definition of 'domestic terrorism' from O.C.G.A. § 16-11-220 and adds a definition of 'assassination' as the intentional killing of an elected public official tied to their official duties or position.
- Section 2-2 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 16-11-221 to define the crime of domestic terrorism directly, using language largely identical to the former definition, and keeps the existing tiered penalties based on death, kidnapping, serious bodily harm, or infrastructure damage.
- Sections 2-3 through 2-6 update references to domestic terrorism in the racketeering law, the state sanctuary policy law (O.C.G.A. § 20-3-10), the local sanctuary policy law (O.C.G.A. § 36-80-23), and the Board of Homeland Security definitions (O.C.G.A. § 38-3-40) to point to the new § 16-11-221 crime definition.
From the bill
“Failure to obey a subpoena issued under this Code section may be punished by the court as contempt of court.”
“The issuance of a subpoena pursuant to this Code section shall not be made public during any pending investigation or prosecution of criminal or unlawful activity beyond the extent necessary for the issuance and compliance of the subpoena”
“'Assassination' means the intentional killing of an elected public official by an individual acting to prevent or retaliate for the performance of official duties or because of the public position held by the official.”
Status timeline
- Effective Date
- Act 68
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
Show full history (16 actions)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Clint Crowe (R, HD-118)
- Matt Reeves (R, HD-99)
- Kimberly New (R, HD-40)
- Beth Camp (R, HD-135)
- Tyler Paul Smith (R, HD-18)
- John Albers (R, SD-56)
Votes
- House voteMarch 6, 2025
158 yea, 8 nay (7 not voting, 7 excused)
- Senate voteMarch 20, 2025
48 yea, 4 nay (1 not voting, 3 excused)
- House voteMarch 25, 2025
150 yea, 18 nay (6 not voting, 6 excused)
Topics
- domestic terrorism law
- Georgia Bureau of Investigation
- electronic records subpoenas
- criminal law
- homeland security