Skip to content
Georgia Commons
Menu

House · Engrossed · 2025-2026 Regular Session

HB 979: State government; procedures for retrocession of jurisdiction in certain circumstances; provide

Last action March 27, 2026 · House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended

This bill rewrites how Georgia's Governor may accept the federal government's transfer (retrocession) of legal jurisdiction over land on military installations, and separately requires public disclosure of settlement agreements resolving harassment or discrimination claims against the General Assembly.

Read the full bill text

These buttons carry the bill's own text, not the summaries below. Copy for LLM, View as markdown, and Send to AI use the Markdown version: the text as filed, then the summaries under a heading that names them as ours. View raw is the text alone.

The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Comm Sub version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.

In plain language

Current Georgia law lets the Governor accept 'retrocession,' meaning the federal government handing back some or all of its legal jurisdiction over land it owns in Georgia, based on a simple written notice describing the land. This bill replaces that loose process with detailed requirements: the request must name the requesting official and their authority, clearly state what jurisdiction is being requested, describe the military installation by exact boundaries, and say whether future land added to the base is included. If the Governor accepts, the acceptance and related documents must be filed with the local recording office and copies sent back to the requester. The bill also lets a state agency, local government, or district make a reciprocal agreement with a federal agency to divide duties on jointly governed military land, but only for cases involving people under 17. Separately, the bill adds a new Code section requiring that settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly, its chambers, or its members and staff be publicly disclosed with the claimant's name redacted, applied retroactively, while otherwise keeping the General Assembly outside Georgia's open records law (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70 through 50-18-78). The law would take effect once the Governor signs it.

What the bill does

  • Replaces the current simple written-notice process for retroceding federal jurisdiction over land with a detailed request requirement naming the official, describing the land by exact boundaries, and stating the scope of jurisdiction sought.
  • Requires the Governor's acceptance of a retrocession request to specify exactly which parts of the request are accepted and to be filed with the local recording office.
  • Allows state agencies, local governments, or districts to enter reciprocal agreements with federal agencies over military installations with concurrent jurisdiction, but only for handling cases involving people under 17.
  • Creates a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-79) requiring settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly to be made public with the claimant's identity redacted, applied retroactively.
  • Keeps the General Assembly generally exempt from Georgia's open records law except for this new settlement-disclosure requirement.
  • Sets the effective date as the day the Governor signs the bill or it otherwise becomes law.

Who it affects

The Governor's office, federal agencies that control military installations in Georgia, state agencies and local governments near those installations, and people (especially minors) who might be involved in incidents on jointly governed military land. The General Assembly, its members and staff, and people who have filed harassment or discrimination claims against them are also affected by the new disclosure rule.

Why it matters

Georgians living near military bases could see clearer rules for how state and federal authority over those lands is divided, particularly for incidents involving minors. Separately, settlements resolving harassment or discrimination complaints against state lawmakers or legislative staff would become publicly disclosable, with the claimant's name kept private, changing what has been confidential information.

Key provisions

  • Section 1 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 50-2-27(b) to require the Governor to reject retrocession requests unless they state the requester's name, position, and authority, describe the land by metes and bounds, and clarify jurisdiction scope.
  • Section 1 adds subsection (c) requiring the Governor's acceptance to specify accepted elements and be filed with the recording office and sent to the requester.
  • Section 1 adds subsection (e) allowing reciprocal duty-sharing agreements between state and federal agencies over concurrent jurisdiction land, limited to alleged acts by people under 17.
  • Section 2 creates O.C.G.A. § 50-18-79, requiring public disclosure (with claimant identity redacted) of settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly, applied retroactively.
  • Section 2 also states this disclosure duty is the only way the General Assembly is subject to the open records law, otherwise exempting it from O.C.G.A. §§ 50-18-70 through 50-18-78.
  • Section 3 sets the effective date as the date of the Governor's approval or the date the bill becomes law without signature.

From the bill

“The Governor shall not accept a request of retrocession of jurisdiction unless the written request:”

Introduces the new, stricter conditions the Governor must follow before accepting federal jurisdiction transfers.

“The duties authorized in such reciprocal agreement shall be limited to when alleged acts have been committed by persons under 17 years of age upon a United States military installation subject to concurrent jurisdiction.”

Limits the new reciprocal duty-sharing agreements to cases involving minors on military land.

Discussed in meetings (15)

The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.

  1. House Judiciary Committee, February 5, 2026

    From 1:14:48 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said HB 979 would establish a process for the federal government and Georgia to share jurisdiction over juvenile offenses on military installations. The sponsor explained that Georgia could accept jurisdiction but would not be required to do so. According to the sponsor, the goal was to let young people use the state's juvenile system and rehabilitation services rather than a federal system geared toward adults. The sponsor described this as a Department of Defense priority and said 26 states had such arrangements. A Georgia Department of Veterans' Services witness expressed the agency's full support. A committee member supported returning authority to the state and moved to approve the bill. The committee approved it by voice vote, with no opposition heard.

  2. House Rules Committee, February 9, 2026

    From 0:37:20 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said HB 979, requested by a Department of Defense division, would create a process for Georgia to share jurisdiction over military installations and accept juvenile cases. The sponsor said the federal system lacked a juvenile process. A member asked about added juvenile-court costs in communities with large military populations. The sponsor said accepting cases would be optional, courts could decline cases they lacked resources to handle, and funding could be addressed in future budgets. The sponsor also said state proceedings could offer rehabilitation unavailable in the federal system. No calendar action was taken.

  3. House floor session, March 4, 2026 (legislative day 27, PM, part 2)

    From 0:29:22 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 1925

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said HB 979, requested by a Pentagon office, would allow shared jurisdiction over juvenile cases on military installations so young people could receive more appropriate treatment than the federal adult system provides. Asked where such arrangements already exist, the sponsor said only part of Fort Benning had one. The sponsor said the bill would establish geographic areas around military installations and allow the state to accept cases individually rather than require it to do so. In response to cost and legislative authority questions, the sponsor said there was no current additional state expense and that legislation was necessary for the federal government to give jurisdiction to Georgia. The House passed the bill 161–0.

  4. House Rules Committee, March 4, 2026

    From 0:34:41 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 1881

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The committee added HB 979 to the day's supplemental calendar under modified structured rules without stated opposition. No provisions were discussed.

  5. Senate Veterans, Military, and Homeland Security Committee, March 17, 2026

    From 0:04:19 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said HB 979 would let Georgia accept jurisdiction over juvenile cases on federal installations without separate local agreements. The sponsor said the Department of Defense requested the measure because the federal system lacks a juvenile system and state courts offer rehabilitation options. Asked about installations crossing county lines, the sponsor said the framework would cover county boundaries while leaving acceptance voluntary. A member and legislative counsel noted that the text did not expressly limit the measure to juveniles. The sponsor confirmed that intent, and the committee adopted an amendment limiting it to people under 18. One member questioned excluding adults and asked whether Georgia-specific case data established a need. The sponsor said no such data had been provided, but 26 states had similar language and the bill would streamline an existing process. Asked about military branches, the sponsor said it covered all federal installations in Georgia. Members also discussed adult jurisdiction and a Fort Stewart shooting; the sponsor said the circumstances of that case were unclear. The committee approved the amended bill by voice vote, with opposition heard and no count announced.

  6. Senate Rules Committee, March 19, 2026

    From 0:14:19 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The presenter said the bill would create a framework for military installations to transfer jurisdiction over juvenile cases to Georgia if the state agreed to accept it. No separate vote or scheduling decision was recorded.

  7. Senate Rules Committee, March 20, 2026

    From 0:17:07 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the bill would establish a framework for federal military installations to transfer jurisdiction over juvenile cases to the state. The sponsor said the Pentagon’s Office of Family Policy requested the measure. A committee member later selected it for the floor calendar, which the committee approved unanimously.

  8. Senate floor session, March 23, 2026 (legislative day 36)

    From 4:38:06 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Third Read)

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The presenter said HB 979, requested by the Pentagon’s Office of Military Community and Family Policy, would let Georgia accept jurisdiction over juvenile offenses on military installations. The presenter said federal courts lack a juvenile code and that state juvenile courts could provide more appropriate case handling. The presenter emphasized that the framework was optional, not a mandate. An amendment changed the applicable age from under 18 to under 17 to match Georgia’s juvenile system. Asked about a military parent’s deployment, the presenter said the child’s case could still proceed and supervision could be transferred to another jurisdiction. A second amendment’s sponsor proposed public disclosure of legislative employment settlements involving harassment, discrimination or retaliation, with the claimant’s identity removed. The clerk read language applying that disclosure requirement retroactively without broadly subjecting the legislature to open-records or open-meetings laws. Both amendments were adopted without objection. The Senate adopted the amended substitute and passed it 50-1.

  9. House floor session, March 27, 2026 (legislative day 38, part 2)

    From 0:30:11 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended)

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said HB 979 would allow federal military installations to transfer authority over juvenile cases to the state. The sponsor said the Senate narrowed the framework to people younger than 17, and a House amendment would add creation of a trade commission. One member challenged removal of Senate language that would make state-paid settlements of legislative sexual harassment, discrimination or retaliation claims available through open records requests, with claimants' names removed. The member argued that removing it undermined transparency. The sponsor said the issue had not been discussed collectively in the House and deserved debate before action. Another member urged passage of the transparency language before the session ended. The House adopted its amendment without objection and agreed to the Senate substitute as amended, 149 to 6.

Status timeline

  1. 2026-03-27House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended (House)
  2. 2026-03-23Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senate)
  3. 2026-03-23Senate Third Read (Senate)
  4. 2026-03-19Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
  5. 2026-03-18Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senate)
  6. 2026-03-06Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
  7. 2026-03-04House Passed/Adopted (House)
  8. 2026-03-04House Third Readers (House)
Show full history (12 actions)
  1. 2026-02-06House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
  2. 2026-01-27House Second Readers (House)
  3. 2026-01-16House First Readers (House)
  4. 2026-01-15House Hopper (House)

Sponsors

  • Josh Bonner (R, HD-73)Primary sponsor
  • Tyler Paul Smith (R, HD-18)
  • Bethany Ballard (R, HD-147)
  • Soo Hong (R, HD-103)
  • Scott Holcomb (D, HD-101)
  • Chuck Payne (R, SD-54)

Votes

  1. PassedHouse voteMarch 4, 2026

    161 yea, 0 nay (3 not voting, 13 excused)

    PASSAGE: House Vote #632

  2. PassedSenate voteMarch 23, 2026

    50 yea, 1 nay (0 not voting, 3 excused)

    PASSAGE BY SUBSTITUTE: Senate Vote #793

  3. PassedHouse voteMarch 27, 2026

    149 yea, 6 nay (7 not voting, 14 excused)

    Agree to Senate Sub as Am: House Vote #777

Topics

  • military installations
  • state government transparency
  • open records law
  • legislative accountability
  • jurisdiction over federal land

Ask about this bill

Answers come from this document. Not legal advice.

Machine-readable https://georgiacommons.org/bills/2025-2026/hb979.md · https://georgiacommons.org/bills/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp

HB979: State government; procedures for retrocession of jurisdiction in certain circumstances; provide | Georgia Commons