HB 979: State government; procedures for retrocession of jurisdiction in certain circumstances; provide
Última acción: 27 de marzo de 2026 · House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended
This bill rewrites how Georgia's Governor may accept the federal government's transfer (retrocession) of legal jurisdiction over land on military installations, and separately requires public disclosure of settlement agreements resolving harassment or discrimination claims against the General Assembly.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Comm Sub, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Current Georgia law lets the Governor accept 'retrocession,' meaning the federal government handing back some or all of its legal jurisdiction over land it owns in Georgia, based on a simple written notice describing the land. This bill replaces that loose process with detailed requirements: the request must name the requesting official and their authority, clearly state what jurisdiction is being requested, describe the military installation by exact boundaries, and say whether future land added to the base is included. If the Governor accepts, the acceptance and related documents must be filed with the local recording office and copies sent back to the requester. The bill also lets a state agency, local government, or district make a reciprocal agreement with a federal agency to divide duties on jointly governed military land, but only for cases involving people under 17. Separately, the bill adds a new Code section requiring that settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly, its chambers, or its members and staff be publicly disclosed with the claimant's name redacted, applied retroactively, while otherwise keeping the General Assembly outside Georgia's open records law (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70 through 50-18-78). The law would take effect once the Governor signs it.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Replaces the current simple written-notice process for retroceding federal jurisdiction over land with a detailed request requirement naming the official, describing the land by exact boundaries, and stating the scope of jurisdiction sought.
- Requires the Governor's acceptance of a retrocession request to specify exactly which parts of the request are accepted and to be filed with the local recording office.
- Allows state agencies, local governments, or districts to enter reciprocal agreements with federal agencies over military installations with concurrent jurisdiction, but only for handling cases involving people under 17.
- Creates a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-79) requiring settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly to be made public with the claimant's identity redacted, applied retroactively.
- Keeps the General Assembly generally exempt from Georgia's open records law except for this new settlement-disclosure requirement.
- Sets the effective date as the day the Governor signs the bill or it otherwise becomes law.
A quién afecta
The Governor's office, federal agencies that control military installations in Georgia, state agencies and local governments near those installations, and people (especially minors) who might be involved in incidents on jointly governed military land. The General Assembly, its members and staff, and people who have filed harassment or discrimination claims against them are also affected by the new disclosure rule.
Por qué importa
Georgians living near military bases could see clearer rules for how state and federal authority over those lands is divided, particularly for incidents involving minors. Separately, settlements resolving harassment or discrimination complaints against state lawmakers or legislative staff would become publicly disclosable, with the claimant's name kept private, changing what has been confidential information.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 50-2-27(b) to require the Governor to reject retrocession requests unless they state the requester's name, position, and authority, describe the land by metes and bounds, and clarify jurisdiction scope.
- Section 1 adds subsection (c) requiring the Governor's acceptance to specify accepted elements and be filed with the recording office and sent to the requester.
- Section 1 adds subsection (e) allowing reciprocal duty-sharing agreements between state and federal agencies over concurrent jurisdiction land, limited to alleged acts by people under 17.
- Section 2 creates O.C.G.A. § 50-18-79, requiring public disclosure (with claimant identity redacted) of settlement agreements resolving harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims against the General Assembly, applied retroactively.
- Section 2 also states this disclosure duty is the only way the General Assembly is subject to the open records law, otherwise exempting it from O.C.G.A. §§ 50-18-70 through 50-18-78.
- Section 3 sets the effective date as the date of the Governor's approval or the date the bill becomes law without signature.
Del proyecto de ley
“The Governor shall not accept a request of retrocession of jurisdiction unless the written request:”
“The duties authorized in such reciprocal agreement shall be limited to when alleged acts have been committed by persons under 17 years of age upon a United States military installation subject to concurrent jurisdiction.”
Cronología del estado
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub As Amended (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- House Passed/Adopted (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Third Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
Mostrar el historial completo (12 acciones)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Hopper (Cámara de Representantes)
Patrocinadores
- Josh Bonner (R, HD-073)
- Tyler Smith (R, HD-018)
- Bethany Ballard (R, HD-147)
- Soo Hong (R, HD-103)
- Scott Holcomb (D, HD-101)
- Chuck Payne (R, SD-054)
Votaciones
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes4 de marzo de 2026
161 a favor, 0 en contra (3 sin votar, 13 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado23 de marzo de 2026
50 a favor, 1 en contra (0 sin votar, 3 ausentes)
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes27 de marzo de 2026
149 a favor, 6 en contra (7 sin votar, 14 ausentes)
Temas
- military installations
- state government transparency
- open records law
- legislative accountability
- jurisdiction over federal land