House · Passed · 2025-2026 Regular Session
HR 32: General Assembly; increase maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property - CA
Last action May 14, 2025 · Effective Date
A Georgia House resolution would ask voters to amend the state constitution to raise the acreage cap for farmland and timberland taxed under the bona fide conservation use program from 2,000 to 4,000 acres per owner.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the resolution and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest the General Assembly's website lists.
In plain language
Georgia's constitution lets landowners get a special tax assessment on farmland and timberland if they agree to keep it in agricultural or timber use, known as bona fide conservation use property. Current law caps how much land a single owner can enroll at 2,000 acres. This resolution proposes raising that cap to 4,000 acres. The change would go through Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III of the Georgia Constitution. It does not change the rules requiring landowners to sign a ten-year covenant to keep the land in conservation use, or the penalty for breaking that covenant, which is repayment of the tax savings plus possible other penalties. Because this is a constitutional amendment, it cannot take effect on its own. It must go before Georgia voters on a statewide ballot, worded as a yes-or-no question about raising the acreage limit from 2,000 to 4,000 acres for the stated purpose of protecting family farmland.
What the bill does
- Raises the maximum acreage a single owner can enroll as bona fide conservation use farmland or timberland from 2,000 to 4,000 acres.
- Leaves unchanged the five-acre cap for bona fide residential transitional property under the same constitutional provision.
- Keeps the existing requirement that landowners sign a covenant to maintain the land in conservation use.
- Keeps the existing ten-year penalty rule requiring repayment of tax savings, and possibly other penalties, if the covenant is broken early.
- Sends the proposed change to Georgia voters as a statewide ballot question rather than enacting it directly.
Who it affects
Owners of large farms and timber tracts in Georgia who use the conservation use tax program, county tax assessors and boards who administer the assessments, and Georgia voters, who will decide the outcome on a statewide ballot.
Why it matters
If voters approve it, owners of large agricultural and timber holdings could shelter up to twice as much land under the reduced conservation use tax assessment, potentially lowering their property tax bills. County tax digests and local property tax revenue could be affected in areas with large qualifying landholdings.
Key provisions
- Section 1 amends Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III(e)(1) of the Georgia Constitution, changing the acreage limit for bona fide conservation use property from 2,000 to 4,000 acres.
- Section 1 leaves intact the requirement that the General Assembly define assessment methods using current use, annual productivity, and real property sales data.
- Section 1 preserves the covenant requirement and the ten-year recapture penalty for breaching the conservation use covenant.
- Section 2 sets the ballot language voters will see, framing the question as increasing the acreage cap from 2,000 to 4,000 acres to protect family farmland.
- Section 2 specifies that if ratified by voters, the amendment becomes part of the Georgia Constitution.
From the bill
“A breach of such covenant within ten years shall result in a recapture of the tax savings resulting from such methods of assessment and taxation and may result in other appropriate penalties”
“Shall the Constitution of Georgia, for the purpose of protecting family ( ) NO farmland, be amended so as to increase the maximum acreage to qualify for assessment and taxation as a bona fide conservation use property from 2,000 acres to 4,000 acres?”
Status timeline
- Effective Date
- Act 363
- House Date Signed by Governor (House)
- House Sent to Governor (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Third Read (Senate)
- Senate Engrossed (Senate)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senate)
Show full history (22 actions)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Postponed (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
- House First Readers (House)
- House Hopper (House)
Sponsors
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
- Robert Dickey (R, HD-134)
- Leesa Hagan (R, HD-156)
- Debbie Buckner (D, HD-137)
- Sam Watson (R, SD-11)
Votes
- House voteMarch 3, 2025
168 yea, 5 nay (1 not voting, 6 excused)
- Senate voteMarch 18, 2025
29 yea, 23 nay (1 not voting, 3 excused)
- Senate voteMarch 18, 2025
50 yea, 1 nay (1 not voting, 4 excused)
Topics
- property taxes
- farmland conservation
- constitutional amendment
- timber land
- agricultural taxation