SB 587: Offenses Against Public Health and Morals; the establishment of an animal cruelty database; provide

In plain language

What the bill does

Who it affects

Why it matters

Key provisions

From the bill

Discussed in meetings (18)

The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.

1. Senate Public Safety Committee, March 2, 2026

   From 0:22:01 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 587 would prevent people convicted of animal cruelty from adopting animals and authorize the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council to maintain a publicly searchable statewide database, subject to funding. The sponsor emphasized that the database would cover convictions, not accusations. The chair suggested that identifying animal abusers could also help prevent harm to people, and the sponsor agreed. A witness for the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council supported the proposal, saying shelters could use the database to identify applicants with animal abuse histories. The witness said Florida and Tennessee had adopted similar registries and that work with legislative counsel would continue to refine the bill. The committee unanimously approved it.

2. Senate Rules Committee, March 5, 2026

   From 0:52:06 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 587 would create a database of people convicted of animal abuse, maintained by the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council. The sponsor said people listed in the database would be permanently barred from adopting animals. The committee unanimously included the bill in the floor-calendar package.

3. Senate floor session, March 6, 2026 (legislative day 28, part 1)

   From 6:03:26 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Tabled)

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 587 would require the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council to create and maintain a statewide animal-cruelty database, updated at least monthly with convictions and guilty pleas. The sponsor said humane societies could check it to help prevent people convicted of cruelty from adopting more animals. The sponsor cited recent animal-abuse cases as the reason for the proposal. An amendment required court clerks to send conviction and sentencing information to the council. The Senate adopted the amendment without objection and passed the bill as amended, 54 to 0.

4. House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, March 17, 2026

   From 1:16:11 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 587 would create a database of people convicted of animal cruelty, updated at least monthly, so humane societies and other adoption organizations could identify applicants and deny adoptions. The sponsor said funding would depend on appropriations and distributed a cost breakdown prepared by the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council, without stating an amount. A council witness supported the bill and said no matching federal funding was known to be available when a committee member asked. Another supporting witness described adopting a dog that had suffered abuse and urged passage. No vote was taken because the committee lacked a quorum.

5. House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, March 19, 2026

   From 0:24:27 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The chair called up SB 587, and members made and seconded a motion to pass the version before the committee. No amendments or substantive discussion followed. The committee approved it by voice vote, with no opposition heard.

6. House Rules Committee, March 20, 2026

   From 0:32:43 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 587 would create a statewide database maintained by the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council for people convicted of animal cruelty, not merely accused. The sponsor said adoption organizations could check it when deciding whether to allow someone to adopt a pet and reported strong support from animal adoption groups. There were no questions or recorded vote.

7. House Rules Committee, March 25, 2026

   From 0:41:52 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The committee placed SB 587 on the day's calendar without objection after a motion and second. There was no discussion of the bill's contents.

8. House floor session, March 25, 2026 (legislative day 37, PM)

   From 3:53:38 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (House Postponed)

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The chair postponed the bill until the next legislative day. No substantive discussion occurred.

9. House floor session, March 27, 2026 (legislative day 38, part 1)

   From 1:47:33 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (House Withdrawn, Recommitted)

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The majority leader initially included SB 587 in a motion to return three bills to the Rules Committee. That motion and the accompanying caption readings were withdrawn. The majority leader later made a separate motion to remove this bill from the calendar and return it to Rules. The House agreed without objection, with no discussion of the bill's substance.

10. House Rules Committee, March 31, 2026

    From 0:53:39 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor initially said SB 587 combined an animal-cruelty database proposal with another House member's database-protection language. Later, a substitute presenter said the added language would allow proper welfare checks on elderly and disabled people without identifying their residences. No questions were asked about the substitute. The committee approved it with no opposition stated and later placed SB 587 on the day's floor calendar, also with no opposition stated.

11. House floor session, March 31, 2026 (legislative day 39, part 1)

    From 1:12:42 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the 2026 House Journal, p. 3841

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The presenter said SB 587 would let law enforcement seek a superior court order when someone whose welfare is under investigation has moved from a known address to an unknown location. The presenter cited a tragic incident in Griffin as a reason for the change. The presenter also said the bill would create an animal cruelty database to prevent people listed for animal abuse from obtaining another animal to abuse. No members asked questions. The House adopted the Rules Committee substitute without objection and passed the bill 163 to 0.

12. Senate floor session, March 31, 2026 (legislative day 39, part 2)

    From 3:41:07 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Agreed House Amend or Sub)

    Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor asked senators to agree to the House substitute for the animal-cruelty database bill. The clerk described added provisions allowing court orders to locate alleged victims of child or elder abuse and requiring conviction information to be sent to the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council. The sponsor described the added section as protecting children moved during an open investigation. No questions or opposition followed. The Senate agreed, 48 to 0.

• Read aloud: Senate floor session, February 26, 2026 (legislative day 25), 0:22:50
• Read aloud: Senate floor session, March 3, 2026 (legislative day 26), 0:35:02
• Read aloud: Senate floor session, March 4, 2026 (legislative day 27), 0:51:14
• Read aloud: House floor session, March 9, 2026 (legislative day 29), 1:02:18
• Read aloud: House floor session, March 10, 2026 (legislative day 30), 0:46:54
• Read aloud: House floor session, March 19, 2026 (legislative day 34), 0:36:16

Status timeline

Sponsors

Votes

Topics