SB 618: Municipal Court of the City of Decatur; the assessment and collection of a technology fee; authorize
Last action May 11, 2026 · Effective Date 2026-05-11
A Senate bill would let the Municipal Court of the City of Decatur add a technology fee, up to $15, onto criminal and quasi-criminal fines to help pay for court and police technology.
The summaries below were written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5) from the text of the bill and are not part of it. Quote the text, not the summary. The stored text is the Enrolled version, the latest LegiScan holds.
In plain language
This bill authorizes the Municipal Court of the City of Decatur to charge a technology fee as a surcharge on top of criminal and quasi-criminal fines. The Decatur city government sets the exact fee amount and can change it over time, but the fee can never exceed $15, and the municipal court judge may waive it case by case. The money raised must go only toward specific technology needs: computer hardware and software, imaging and communications equipment like scanners and printers, and police department technology such as body cameras, vehicle cameras, drones, and the 9-1-1 emergency dispatch system. The funds must be kept in a separate account managed by the court clerk and the city's chief financial officer, and spent only with the city manager's approval. The bill also repeals any conflicting laws.
What the bill does
- Authorizes the Decatur Municipal Court clerk to charge and collect a technology fee, capped at $15, added to criminal and quasi-criminal fines.
- Lets the City of Decatur's governing authority set and change the fee rate over time, as long as it stays at or under $15.
- Gives the municipal court judge discretion to waive the fee on a case-by-case basis.
- Restricts use of the fee money to specific technology purchases for the court and police department, including computers, imaging equipment, and police cameras and drones.
- Requires the fee revenue to be kept in a separate account overseen by the court clerk and the city's chief financial officer, spent only with the city manager's approval.
Who it affects
People fined in the Municipal Court of the City of Decatur for criminal or quasi-criminal offenses, the court clerk and judge, the City of Decatur's finance department and city manager, and the Decatur police department, which would benefit from the technology funded by the fee.
Why it matters
Anyone fined in Decatur's municipal court could pay up to $15 more per case, though judges can waive it. The money would fund specific upgrades like police body cameras, drones, and the city's 9-1-1 dispatch system, changing how those tools get paid for.
Key provisions
- Section 1(a) authorizes the fee as a surcharge on fines, caps it at $15, lets the city set and adjust the exact rate, and allows judicial waivers case by case.
- Section 1(a) lists three allowed uses: computer hardware and software, imaging and communications equipment, and police department technology including cameras, drones, and 9-1-1 systems.
- Section 1(b) requires the funds be kept in a segregated account managed by the court clerk and city chief financial officer and spent only on city manager's direction.
- Section 1(b) allows the funds to reimburse the city's information technology department for services to the court or police.
- Section 2 repeals any conflicting laws.
From the bill
“such fee shall not exceed $15.00 and that the judge of the municipal court shall be authorized to waive such fee on a case-by-case basis”
“Funds collected pursuant to this section shall be maintained in a segregated account by the clerk of the municipal court and the chief financial officer of the city, separate from other funds of the city”
Status timeline
- Effective Date 2026-05-11
- Act 619
- Senate Date Signed by Governor (Senate)
- Senate Sent to Governor (Senate)
- House Passed/Adopted (House)
- House Third Readers (House)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (House)
- House Second Readers (House)
Show full history (13 actions)
- House First Readers (House)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senate)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senate)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senate)
- Senate Hopper (Senate)
Sponsors
- Elena Parent (D, SD-044)
- Mary Oliver (D, HD-084)
Votes
- Senate voteMarch 16, 2026
48 yea, 1 nay (3 not voting, 2 absent)
- House voteApril 2, 2026
110 yea, 63 nay (1 not voting, 2 absent)
Topics
- court fees
- local government funding
- police technology
- Decatur municipal court
- public safety funding