SB 424: "Transactional Gold and Silver Act"; enact

In plain language

What the bill does

Who it affects

Why it matters

Key provisions

From the bill

Discussed in meetings (12)

The House and Senate meetings that took this bill up, from their machine transcripts. Each account was written by Georgia Commons with AI and is not part of the record; the video is what was said.

1. Senate floor session, January 28, 2026 (legislative day 8)

   From 0:25:16 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Read and Referred)

   Summary by Georgia Commons: SB 424 received a first reading and was referred to Banking and Financial Institutions. Later, the sponsor described a system allowing Georgians to own fractional amounts of gold or silver in a state-supervised depository and use a card to spend the value. The sponsor said this would make precious-metal ownership accessible without buying an entire coin and offer another payment option. The sponsor described gold as protection against inflation, said Texas already had a depository and five other states had transactional gold systems, and identified Glint as existing technology for such transactions. No questions or vote followed the presentation.

2. Senate floor session, February 10, 2026 (legislative day 16)

   From 2:11:03 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: During a personal-privilege speech leading up to identifying the bill, a senator advocated recognizing gold and silver as legal tender, creating a state-backed electronic transfer system and removing state taxes on their use. The senator said these changes would offer stable money and protection against federal overreach, and cited activity in Texas, Florida and Arkansas. No action on the bill was shown.

3. Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee, February 19, 2026

   From 1:09:55 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the bill would recognize gold and silver as legal tender, remove state capital gains taxes on their use, and establish a five-member commission overseeing insured storage and electronic payments. The sponsor said user fees would cover operations and small purchases would broaden access. Members questioned why existing private services were insufficient, gold's volatility, lost tax revenue, a new commission and whether users might mistake insurance for a state guarantee. The sponsor acknowledged federal taxes would remain and offered to add warnings about investment risk. The treasurer said Georgia could explore contractors or other states' services without building a facility. A Goldback witness supported legal-tender status and tax exemptions but opposed state participation. A Sound Money Defense League witness opposed the proposal as unnecessary and challenged claims about federal taxation and confiscation protection. A Verfin Solutions witness warned of taxpayer exposure and consumer confusion. A Glint Pay witness supported state authorization and argued it could offer protection against federal interference. Witnesses for the Transactional Gold Project and National Security Investment Consulting Institute argued that limited oversight would protect consumers, expand competition and help households hedge against inflation. The treasurer said their reading did not impose state liability. No vote occurred; the chair planned further questions and a Tuesday vote.

4. Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee, February 24, 2026

   From 0:05:05 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the bill would recognize gold and silver as legal tender and establish oversight of storage providers and electronic payments. The sponsor argued this would offer an inflation hedge and let people buy and spend small amounts. Citing a fiscal note, the sponsor said implementation would have no state cost, with users paying storage fees and merchants paying transaction fees. The sponsor said state capital-gains taxes would no longer apply, but sales taxes would remain. One member pressed for exact fees and who would collect them. The sponsor said fees would depend on competitive bids. Other members questioned fraud reimbursement, public demand, lost tax revenue and why state involvement was necessary when gold-backed payments already exist. The sponsor acknowledged existing services and said customer protections would be addressed through contracting. The committee secretary raised price volatility and inadequate investment disclosures. The sponsor proposed risk disclaimers. A Sound Money Trade Organization witness supported legal-tender recognition but opposed state involvement in storage, citing competition, cybersecurity and potential costs. A Citizens for Sound Money witness opposed the bill as written for similar reasons. A Libertarian Party of Georgia witness supported passage despite preferring a private-market approach. An NSIC witness said private providers would operate under state safeguards, vendors would cover hacked accounts, and accepting gold or silver would be optional. A member disputed whether the bill clearly limited state operation of a depository. The committee voted 5–3 to advance the bill to Rules.

5. Senate Rules Committee, March 5, 2026

   From 0:24:59 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 424 would make gold legal tender in Georgia through a voluntary system. The sponsor said an audit review found no cost to the state and described a depository subject to state oversight. No substantive questions followed. The committee unanimously included the bill in the floor-calendar package.

6. Senate floor session, March 6, 2026 (legislative day 28, part 2)

   From 1:59:24 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel · Confirmed by the bill's status history (Senate Taken from Table)

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said the bill would create a voluntary system for holding gold and silver in a state-supervised depository and spending it through electronic payments. The sponsor said users could buy small amounts, such as $5 or $10, rather than whole coins. The sponsor described oversight involving the state treasurer and legislative and governor-appointed representatives, with contractors selected for the depository and payment system. Citing a fiscal review, the sponsor said user fees would cover costs without expense to the state. In questions, one member described debit-card purchases backed by gold and said treating gold as legal tender would eliminate income tax on gains in its value. A second supporter said the system would offer a way to protect savings against inflation. Another member questioned whether it would expand government involvement with the gold industry, but the chair did not provide a substantive answer. The Senate passed the bill, 29-21.

7. House Banks & Banking Committee, March 17, 2026

   From 0:34:12 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor said SB 424 would recognize gold and silver as legal tender, create a commission overseeing private storage and payment providers, and allow debit-card spending from precious-metal accounts. The sponsor presented this as an inflation safeguard accessible to small savers, with implementation in 2028. The sponsor said state capital-gains taxes would not apply, but acknowledged that federal taxes and sales taxes on purchases would remain. Private parties would have to consent to direct gold or silver payments. Members questioned fees, insurance, state costs, spending limits, market losses, competition and whether existing services made legislation necessary. The sponsor said users would fund storage, insurance and transactions, while competitive bidding would establish prices. A Treasury representative offered no cost estimate, but described participant-funded state programs and suggested considering reserves for oversight and provider disruptions. A Sound Money Defense League witness opposed the proposal, arguing that state-selected vendors would undermine existing competition and invite litigation. A National Security Investment Consultant Institute witness supported oversight as consumer protection and disputed the opponent's characterization of Texas litigation. That witness acknowledged that Texas and Florida payment systems were not yet operating. Several members urged more preparation. The chair announced tabling the bill until the following week for further answers. No amendment or counted vote was stated.

8. House Banks & Banking Committee, March 26, 2026

   From 0:15:07 · Watch on the General Assembly's Vimeo channel

   Summary by Georgia Commons: The sponsor presented a substitute for SB 424 that would put private gold and silver depositories and electronic payment systems under securities oversight, rather than a bullion depository commission, and remove state-run depositories. The sponsor said participation would be voluntary and legal-tender treatment would eliminate state taxes on gains, but not federal taxes. Asked about lost revenue, the sponsor acknowledged that no fiscal estimate covered that impact. Several members sought further study, citing opposition messages and limited time to review the substitute. The sponsor argued that delay would put Georgia behind Florida and Texas. Members questioned bank deposits, fraud, unknown storage fees, privacy, rulemaking authority, access for unbanked residents and price changes. The sponsor said existing gold holdings would not affect bank lending, fees remained to be negotiated, card safeguards would apply, and merchants would receive dollar payments. A securities official said the division had commodities experience and could develop compliance rules, investigate fraud and expand financial education. One member supported voluntary access but questioned the Secretary of State’s responsiveness. The committee approved an amendment allowing disclosure of account information to the securities commissioner for lawful investigations. The motion to approve the amended substitute failed; no vote count was stated.

• Read aloud: Senate floor session, February 25, 2026 (legislative day 24), 0:32:34
• Read aloud: Senate floor session, February 26, 2026 (legislative day 25), 0:28:50
• Read aloud: House floor session, March 9, 2026 (legislative day 29), 0:51:51
• Read aloud: House floor session, March 10, 2026 (legislative day 30), 0:42:20

Status timeline

Sponsors

Votes

Topics