HB 339: Motor vehicles; exempt ride share drivers or ride share network services from definition of motor carrier
Última acción: 14 de mayo de 2025 · Effective Date 2025-07-01
House Bill 339 would shield ride share companies like Uber and Lyft from lawsuits over crashes caused by their drivers, as long as the company followed background check and other legal requirements, and it also updates the legal definition of elderly or disabled passengers used in Georgia's motor carrier law.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Enrolled, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Georgia law regulates who counts as a 'motor carrier' and sets rules for vehicles that transport people for hire. This bill amends that law (O.C.G.A. § 40-1-100) to clean up and relocate the definition of 'elderly or disabled passenger' so it applies once, clearly, instead of being repeated in multiple places, and it removes an outdated definition of 'Department.' The bigger change is a brand new section, O.C.G.A. § 40-1-201, which says a ride share network service (the company that runs an app connecting riders and drivers) cannot be sued under theories like vicarious liability or product liability for a crash caused by one of its drivers. That protection only applies if the company was not itself negligent or criminally at fault, followed the legal duties it owes drivers, and ran a criminal background check on each driver at least every two years. The bill also says the company's digital network counts as a service, not a product, which matters for product liability claims.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Adds a new Georgia code section (O.C.G.A. § 40-1-201) that protects ride share companies from being held liable for a driver's crash if the company met certain conditions.
- Requires ride share companies to run a criminal background check, or get a certified private background check, on each driver at least once every two years to keep this liability protection.
- Declares that a ride share company's digital network is a 'service' rather than a 'product,' blocking product liability claims based on the app itself.
- Consolidates and rewrites the definition of 'elderly or disabled passenger' in Georgia's motor carrier law so it appears once instead of being repeated in several subsections.
- Removes an outdated definition that called the Department of Public Safety the 'Department' under this article.
A quién afecta
Ride share companies such as Uber and Lyft that operate in Georgia, the drivers who work for them, passengers who use ride share apps, and people injured in crashes involving ride share vehicles who might otherwise sue the company itself.
Por qué importa
If someone is hurt in a crash caused by a ride share driver, this bill would generally block them from suing the ride share company itself, as long as the company ran the required background checks and was not negligent. That shifts legal exposure toward the individual driver rather than the platform.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. § 40-1-100 to define 'elderly or disabled passenger' as anyone over 60 or unable to use mass transportation due to illness, injury, age, or disability, and removes duplicate versions of that definition elsewhere in the statute.
- Section 1 also removes the definition labeling 'Department' as the Department of Public Safety within this part of the code.
- Section 2 creates new Code Section 40-1-201, stating ride share network services are not liable under vicarious or product liability theories for a driver's crash if three conditions are met: no negligence or criminal misconduct by the company, compliance with legal duties to drivers, and a criminal background check every two years.
- Section 2 also states that a ride share company's digital or internet network is a service, not a product, for liability purposes.
- Section 3 repeals any conflicting laws.
Del proyecto de ley
“No ride share network service shall be liable under any theory of liability, including, but not limited to, vicarious or product liability, for any injury to persons or damage to property from the operation of a personal passenger car by a ride share driver”
“Any digital network or internet network used by a ride share network service shall be considered a service and shall not qualify as a product.”
Cronología del estado
- Effective Date 2025-07-01
- Act 257
- House Date Signed by Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Sent to Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Taken from Table (Senado)
- Senate Tabled (Senado)
Mostrar el historial completo (17 acciones)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Third Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Hopper (Cámara de Representantes)
Patrocinadores
- Rob Leverett (R, HD-123)
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
- Bruce Williamson (R, HD-112)
- Houston Gaines (R, HD-120)
- Stan Gunter (R, HD-008)
- Demetrius Douglas (D, HD-078)
- Brian Strickland (R, SD-042)
Votaciones
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes4 de marzo de 2025
166 a favor, 0 en contra (8 sin votar, 6 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado2 de abril de 2025
46 a favor, 7 en contra (2 sin votar, 1 ausentes)
Temas
- ride share regulation
- motor vehicle law
- liability protection
- Uber and Lyft
- driver background checks