HR 1703: House Study Committee on Criminal Post-Conviction Litigation; create
Última acción: 25 de marzo de 2026 · House Committee Favorably Reported
A Georgia House resolution would create a 12-member study committee to examine long delays in resolving ineffective assistance of counsel claims after criminal convictions, with a report due by December 1, 2026.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto de la resolución; no forman parte de él. La resolución está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Introduced, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
When someone convicted of a crime in Georgia claims their trial lawyer performed poorly enough to violate their right to counsel, Georgia court rules require a new lawyer to raise that claim, often causing years-long delays before a motion for new trial is decided. The resolution's preamble cites Georgia Supreme Court cases and a recent concurring opinion from Chief Justice Nels Peterson describing the state's post-conviction system as 'a mess' that requires legislative action to fix. This resolution creates the House Study Committee on Criminal Post-Conviction Litigation, made up of 12 members including legislators, judges, the Attorney General, and representatives of defense lawyers and prosecutors. The committee would study the delays and problems described and recommend legislation. It must hold meetings, may issue a report with proposed legislation, and is set to be abolished on December 1, 2026.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Creates a 12-member House Study Committee on Criminal Post-Conviction Litigation to examine delays in resolving ineffective assistance of counsel claims.
- Directs the Speaker of the House to appoint five legislative members, including chairs of specific House committees, and seven nonlegislative members such as judges and legal association leaders.
- Authorizes the committee to study the problems described in the resolution and recommend legislation or other action.
- Sets rules for committee meetings, expense reimbursement for members, and funding from House-appropriated funds.
- Requires any approved findings or recommendations to be filed as a report with the Clerk of the House before the committee is abolished.
- Abolishes the committee automatically on December 1, 2026.
A quién afecta
The resolution directly affects members appointed to the study committee, including legislators, superior court judges, the Attorney General, the Chief Justice, and leaders of the State Bar, criminal defense lawyers, and prosecutors. More broadly, it concerns criminal defendants raising ineffective assistance of counsel claims and the public defender system.
Por qué importa
The study could lead to legislation changing how Georgia handles claims that a defendant's trial lawyer performed poorly, a process the resolution says currently causes years-long delays in resolving appeals for people convicted of crimes, affecting defendants, courts, and public defender offices statewide.
Disposiciones clave
- Paragraph (1) creates the House Study Committee on Criminal Post-Conviction Litigation.
- Paragraph (2) sets the committee's 12 members: five appointed legislators (including specific committee chairs) and seven nonlegislative members such as judges, the Attorney General, and bar leaders.
- Paragraph (3) directs the committee to study the delays in post-conviction litigation and recommend action or legislation.
- Paragraph (5) sets expense allowances for legislative, state official, and nonlegislative members, capped at five days unless extended, funded through House appropriations.
- Paragraph (6) requires any approved findings or recommendations to be filed as a report with the Clerk of the House before abolishment.
- Paragraph (7) abolishes the committee on December 1, 2026.
Del proyecto de ley
“Georgia's post-conviction litigation system is a mess. It's a mess in large part because of a series of well-meaning but short-sighted decisions this Court made over the course of several decades.”
“In short, the system is broken. We did a lot of the breaking. But it will require legislative action to fix it.”
Cronología del estado
- House Committee Favorably Reported (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Hopper (Cámara de Representantes)
Patrocinadores
- Stan Gunter (R, HD-008)
- Tyler Smith (R, HD-018)
- Rob Leverett (R, HD-123)
- Esther Panitch (D, HD-051)
- Scott Holcomb (D, HD-101)
- Chuck Efstration (R, HD-104)
Temas
- criminal justice
- ineffective assistance of counsel
- public defenders
- court delays
- legislative study committees