Ir al contenido
Georgia Commons

Código Oficial de Georgia Anotado

Título 14. CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS · Capítulo 2. BUSINESS CORPORATIONS · Artículo 5. OFFICE AND AGENT · Parte 2. VENUE

14-2-510. Venue.

Vigente

Actualizado hasta: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

El texto siguiente es la ley tal como la imprime el estado, en inglés.

  1. (a)

    Venue in proceedings against a corporation shall be determined in accordance with the pertinent constitutional and statutory provisions of this state in effect as of July 1, 1989, or thereafter.#

  2. (b)

    Each domestic corporation and each foreign corporation authorized to transact business in this state shall be deemed to reside and to be subject to venue as follows:#

    1. (1)

      In civil proceedings generally, in the county of this state where the corporation maintains its registered office; or if the corporation fails to maintain a registered office, it shall be deemed to reside in the county where its last named registered office or principal office, as shown by the records of the Secretary of State, was maintained;#

    2. (2)

      In actions based on contracts, in that county in this state where the contract to be enforced was made or is to be performed, if the corporation has an office and transacts business in that county;#

    3. (3)

      In actions for damages because of torts, wrong, or injury done, in the county where the cause of action originated, if the corporation has an office and transacts business in that county;#

    4. (4)

      In actions for damages because of torts, wrong, or injury done, in the county where the cause of action originated. If venue is based solely on this paragraph, the defendant shall have the right to remove the action to the county in Georgia where the defendant maintains its principal place of business. A notice of removal shall be filed within 45 days of service of the summons. Upon motion by the plaintiff filed within 45 days of the removal, the court to which the case is removed may remand the case to the original court if it finds that removal is improper under the provisions of this paragraph. Upon the defendant’s filing of a notice of removal, the 45 day time period for filing such notice shall be tolled until the remand, the entry of an order by the court determining that the removal is valid, or the expiration of the time period for the plaintiff to file a motion challenging the removal, whichever occurs first; and#

    5. (5)

      In garnishment proceedings, in the county of this state in which is located the corporate office or place of business where the employee who is the defendant in the main action is employed.#

  3. (c)

    Any residences established by this Code section shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other residence that any domestic or foreign corporation may have by reason of other laws.#

  4. (d)

    Whenever this chapter either requires or permits a proceeding to be brought in the county where the registered office of the corporation is maintained, if the proceeding is against a corporation having a principal office as required under a prior general corporation law, the action or proceeding may be brought in the county where the principal office is located.#

Las notas siguientes se imprimen con la sección, pero no son ley promulgada (O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1(c)). Se muestran aparte del texto.

History

Code 1981, § 14-2-510, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 228, § 4.

Editor's notes

Ga. L. 2000, p. 228, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: ‘‘The Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Civil Litigation Im-provement Act of 2000.’’’

Cross references

Venue generally, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II.

Law reviews

For article summarizing law relating to jurisdiction and venue over domestic and foreign corporations in Georgia, and service thereon, see 21 Mercer L. Rev. 457 (1970). For article, ‘‘Foreign Corporations in Georgia,’’ see 10 Ga. St. B. J. 243 (1973). For article, ‘‘Current Problems with Venue in Georgia,’’ see 12 Ga. St. B. J. 71 (1975). For article, ‘‘Defending the Lawsuit: A First-Round Checklist,’’ see 22 Ga. St. B. J. 24 (1985). For annual review of Georgia Corporation and Business Organization Law, see 15 (No. 7) Ga. St. B. J. 20 (2010). For article, ‘‘2015 Georgia Corporation and Business Organization Case Law Developments,’’ see 21 Ga. St. B. J. 30 (Apr. 2016). For annual survey on business associations, see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 71 (2016). For article, ‘‘2016 Georgia Corporation and Business Organization Case Law Developments,’’ see 22 Ga. St. B. J. 58 (April 2017). For note discussing complications created by alternative places of venue for corporations, see 11 Ga. L. Rev. 149 (1976). For note, ‘‘Venue in Multidefendant Civil Practice in Georgia,’’ see 6 Ga. State U. L. Rev. 427 (1990). For note on 2000 amendment of O.C.G.A. § 14-2-510, see 17 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 37 (2000). For comment on Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184, 138 S.E.2d 100 (1964), see 1 Ga. St. B. J. 236 (1964). For comment on Lamex, Inc. v. Sterling Extruder Corp., 109 Ga. App. 92, 135 S.E.2d 445 (1964), see 2 Ga. St. B. J. 127 (1965). For comment advocating a ‘‘single-act’’ jurisdictional statute as basis for jurisdiction over a foreign corporation, in light of Singer v. Walker, 21 A.D.2d 285, 250 N.Y.S.2d 216 (1964), see 2 Ga. St. B. J. 131 (1965).

Leer la página oficial (el PDF del estado, abierto en la página de la que se leyó este texto).

Actualizado hasta: Including Acts of the 2025 Regular Session of the General Assembly.

Texto leído de t14-(v12)-2017-pdf.pdf, Volumen V12, edición 2017, páginas 92 a 94; acción de fusión: annotated; SHA-256 del archivo f2fad2b71b39.