Ir al contenido
Georgia Commons
Menú

Comité Regulated Industries and Utilities del Senado

Comité Regulated Industries and Utilities del Senado, 26 de febrero de 2026

2025-2026 Regular Session · 450 CAP · 39 min

Esta es una transcripción automática del video de la Asamblea General, hecha por un modelo de reconocimiento de voz. No es un registro oficial y puede entender mal palabras, nombres y números. No se identifica a quienes hablan. El video es el registro: cada marca de tiempo enlaza al momento en que se reproduce.

Copiar para un LLM, Ver como markdown y Enviar a una IA usan la versión en Markdown, en inglés: los resúmenes que escribió Georgia Commons, bajo encabezados que lo indican, y luego toda la transcripción con sus tiempos. Ver sin formato es solo la transcripción.

El video es de la Asamblea General y se reproduce desde su canal de Vimeo. Seleccione cualquier tiempo de abajo para reproducir ese momento. Ver en el canal de Vimeo de la Asamblea General · Agenda

Resumen

Escrito por un modelo de IA (gpt-6.1-sol) a partir de la transcripción. No forma parte del registro, y el video es lo que se dijo.

El comité escuchó testimonios adicionales sobre SB 367 y votó a favor de recomendar su aprobación, con dos miembros en contra y el resto a favor. Una persona sobreviviente de cáncer habló sobre la importancia del tratamiento oportuno, y una persona que anteriormente administraba un hospital apoyó la flexibilización de los requisitos de certificado de necesidad, citando la experiencia en Florida. La discusión incluyó si una mayor competencia podría perjudicar a los hospitales rurales. El comité anunció otra reunión para el lunes al mediodía y levantó la sesión.

Proyectos de ley tratados (1)

Cada relato abarca el tramo de la reunión que indica. El número del proyecto de ley se dice en ese tramo, salvo cuando era el único proyecto en la agenda de un comité.

SB 367. Certificate of Need; health care facilities, services, and equipment dedicated exclusively to the treatment of cancer; provide for exemption

Desde 0:25:35 · turnos 3 a 71

El patrocinador dijo que el proyecto de ley se había presentado en una reunión anterior e invitó a ofrecer testimonios adicionales. Una persona de Augusta sobreviviente de cáncer dijo que el acceso oportuno a la atención médica le había ayudado a sobrevivir al cáncer de páncreas durante nueve años y medio. Apoyó el proyecto de ley si este facilitaba el acceso a la atención del cáncer. Una segunda persona que prestó testimonio, que anteriormente administraba un hospital y actualmente ocupa la dirección ejecutiva de un centro de estudios, apoyó el proyecto de ley y una flexibilización más amplia de los requisitos de certificado de necesidad. Argumentó que estos requisitos restringen la oferta de servicios de salud y dijo que los cambios en Florida habían fomentado la construcción de hospitales, la capacidad de atención ambulatoria, la inversión y el acceso. También describió cómo un hospital para el que había trabajado gastó millones de dólares en oponerse a la aprobación de un hospital competidor. El patrocinador preguntó si la mayor competencia tras los cambios en Florida había provocado el cierre de centros, en particular de hospitales rurales. La persona que prestó testimonio ofreció proporcionar detalles, recordó una mayor colaboración y más alianzas, y dijo que algunos hospitales rurales habían ampliado el acceso, pero no proporcionó cifras de cierres. No se presentó ninguna enmienda ni texto sustitutivo durante esta discusión. El comité aprobó una moción para recomendar la aprobación, con dos miembros en contra y el resto a favor.

Transcripción

81 turnos. Seleccione un tiempo para reproducir ese momento del video.

  1. 0:14:46

    Yeah. Yeah, I'm, yeah, I'm pro-

  2. 0:18:47

    Okay.

  3. 0:18:50

    Yeah.

  4. 0:25:33

    The floor, I want a table here. Uh, Senate Bill 367, Senator Cowsert.

  5. 0:25:39

    Thank you. I, I reviewed the bill previously at a meeting, but there were a number of other people that wanted to be heard on this. So we wanna take the, any following testimony, anybody would like to be heard, then I will close, and we will see if we can move the bill.

  6. 0:25:52

    We have nobody on the signup sheet.

  7. 0:25:54

    You're kidding me.

  8. 0:25:55

    No, sir.

  9. 0:25:56

    All right.

  10. 0:25:57

    Move to pass.

  11. 0:25:57

    We have people testifying.

  12. 0:25:59

    Let's let them- Yeah, p- on, on Zoom? My bad.

  13. 0:26:01

    Yeah.

  14. 0:26:02

    You didn't have them on the signup sheet. Uh, J- Jackson, who's the first one?

  15. 0:26:08

    You are the one who determines the order, but we've got two people on Zoom. I don't have their names. Just pick one.

  16. 0:26:15

    Ronnie it is. Ronnie? Ronnie it is. Ronnie, you're on, baby. Go for it.

  17. 0:26:25

    Ronnie can't hear you. Speak up.

  18. 0:26:26

    Okay. Uh, can you hear me now?

  19. 0:26:28

    I got you, baby. Go ahead.

  20. 0:26:29

    Okay. Hey, um, I

  21. 0:26:31

    Who are, where are you from?

  22. 0:26:33

    Uh, from, uh... Well, my dad's a military brat, but I've been here since '82, so I've been Augusta, Georgia since 1982.

  23. 0:26:40

    Go for it.

  24. 0:26:41

    Um, I was diagnosed-

  25. 0:26:43

    All right

  26. 0:26:43

    ... with pancreatic cancer nine and a half years ago now.

  27. 0:26:47

    Wow.

  28. 0:26:47

    Um, I was blessed to have found it early due to some complications, um, that I had with my panca- a couple of ca- uh, pancreatic attacks.

  29. 0:26:57

    Glad we're seeing

  30. 0:26:58

    Um, and I've been very blessed to have the, the greatest medical staff I think there is. Um, again, of course, with, when you have pancreatic cancer, you don't think you're gonna, you don't think you're, you're very long, you know, for this earth still. But, uh, due to the, uh, due to the access of care that I've received, and I'm sorry if I get emotional, um, due to the access of care that I received, the speed of care that I received, um, for the last nine and a half years, it's been, um, it's been, it's been a trek.

  31. 0:27:35

    It's been a fight the whole time, but it's, it... I'm only here because of the medical providers that have been fighting for me. And I can tell you clearly that the speed of the service and the access to the service that I received are the reason I'm still here. I was given-

  32. 0:27:57

    So Ronnie, you're, you're, Ronnie, you're 100% for this bill, right?

  33. 0:28:00

    I'm, uh, I'm 100% for... If this bill is about keeping access easier, um, for p- cancer patients, yes. 100%.

  34. 0:28:11

    I have a question.

  35. 0:28:11

    We have a question for you. Hang on one minute, Ronnie. It's for Senator-

  36. 0:28:14

    Thank, yeah. Thank you, Ronnie, for coming and, uh, testifying. God bless you, sir, and that is a testament to doctors and treatment. Are you a veteran?

  37. 0:28:25

    Uh, no.

  38. 0:28:26

    Okay. Uh, I just wanted to ask you that since you were in Augusta, but thank you, sir. Appreciate you.

  39. 0:28:32

    Of course.

  40. 0:28:33

    Questions for Ronnie? Ronnie, thank you very much for your testimony.

  41. 0:28:38

    Uh, you're welcome.

  42. 0:28:40

    Thank you. All right, thank you.

  43. 0:28:41

    Thank you.

  44. 0:28:44

    Whoever's next, please.

  45. 0:28:50

    Good morning.

  46. 0:28:51

    Yes, yes, ma'am. So who, who are you, and where are you from?

  47. 0:28:53

    Hi. My name is Amy McGuire. Can you hear me okay?

  48. 0:28:56

    Yes, ma'am.

  49. 0:28:57

    Great. I wanna thank you very much for this opportunity to speak in favor of this bill, and to talk, um, on a larger scale about the deregulation of CON. I understand you're just looking at some, as I have read the bill, but little bit about, uh, Mr. Chairman and members, just thank you for, um, considering this. I was a previous... I spent 25 years in healthcare administration at teaching hospitals in Florida. Um, was involved in GME and CON, and was often on the other side of many of this, and fought w- along with other executives, um, for other hospitals not to locate in our area.

  50. 0:29:30

    But a lot has changed in Florida, and I guess I come to you today as a citizen, a very proud citizen of Georgia, and a concerned resident, and I hope you'll consider just some information. I think Georgia is at a crossroads. We're a very fast-growing str- state. Aging demographics, persistent rural hospital challenges. Certainly, you're all aware of our workforce shortages and our rising healthcare cost. So I'm gonna focus my comments in sort of three buckets, and one, CON, um, has been through a lot of data, restricts supply in a growing state.

  51. 0:30:02

    Um, I am the executive director of a think tank, so I do a lot of research and policy on workforce, on economic impact, and other various pillars. The second pillar I'd like to talk about is workforce challenges, um, and that they require flexibility. And the third is deregulation is about patient care and access. So as you know, Georgia's one of the fastest-growing states. Our population growth, our health capacity, including surgical centers, imaging facilities, behavioral specialty care, all the things that you're dealing with.

  52. 0:30:33

    But as you look under a regulated CON, it's difficult for existing providers to effectively deliver care, like to Ronnie and his family. I'm assuming all of us have been impacted by cancer. I certainly have had a long list, um, including my mother-in-law and, and various others that have died. So the ability to access care timely is very important, not just in this, but in others. So as you consider, um, some of the things that Georgia learned, and again, Florida just, um- I guess in 2019 we started, um, with our deregulation of CON.

  53. 0:31:10

    But some of what has happened in that reform has been increased hospital construction, ambulatory care construction, especially in growing areas and in our rural areas. This has generated more jobs. Um, we've had more outpatient surgical capacity, which improves healthcare access. We've had greater private capital investment, which creates a positive economic impact, and we have expanded access. All of these are things I think Florida, um, did, and now I think Georgia can learn from some of that.

  54. 0:31:41

    So there are targeted solutions that I believe you could look at. One is this, in expanding the beating blanket restrictions, but really looking at the support that's needed in some of these service lines and in some of these areas. And capital follows certainty, and investment follows that. The workforce challenges do require us to be flexible. And I would just close with a couple of thoughts. You know, around the nation we're seeing this border competition as some states regulated, some states don't.

  55. 0:32:13

    I believe we're seeing a lot of that in Georgia right now, and patients and employers will feel the difference in my opinion. I believe we need a more consolidated approach to CON, and I commend all of you for the beginning of this and the start. So I just wanted to take a few minutes and share some of those thoughts and data, and, um, again, thank you for all that you all do. I know it's a hard job.

  56. 0:32:37

    Chairman Cow- Cowsert has a question for you.

  57. 0:32:40

    Amy, thanks for being with us today. So you had experience in Florida at the time they essentially abolished CON?

  58. 0:32:49

    Ye- yes, sir. And even prior, oh, if I may, um, not only that, years ago, um, I was in the C-suite of a hospital that spent millions of dollars, um, against a CON for a hospital. And there are a lot of legal costs that did not need to be incurred. And so as I have moved, now I had served on a, not only hospital board, but in the C-suite. Uh, you will look around and you'll see hospitals opening up urgent care emergency centers. You will see hospitals benefiting from this.

  59. 0:33:20

    And I think if you had three CEOs of hospitals in Florida testifying before you today, they would tell you what a benefit it has been, the deregulation of CON.

  60. 0:33:31

    One of the rationales behind it-

  61. 0:33:35

    S-

  62. 0:33:35

    ... is that, uh, the increased competition might actually put some people out of business, and we've been told for years that rural hospitals were particularly vulnerable on other areas of CON anyway. Did you experience in Florida that any facilities shut down, particularly in the rural parts of the state after CON was abolished?

  63. 0:33:56

    I'd love to get you more detail. Um, and what I recall in my memory as I age is there was a lot more collaboration. There were a lot more, um, rural hospitals that were partnering to provide better care, better access, um, when CON was deregulated. And we did it in phases, certainly in certain service lines, and that was a huge benefit. I think you, it gave the market a chance to adjust, and it also was an opportunity for hospitals to find great partners. I, I think what we see here, and again, as a, um, resident who really cares about our healthcare in Georgia, um, I think we have physicians wanting to come here.

  64. 0:34:33

    You may have seen the data. You know, I think we had 16,000 people leave Florida for Georgia last year. I don't know which of those are doctors, but I will tell you there's so much about our state that is becoming much more attractive. So it's a long way of answering. I can get you the exact specifics. What I do know is, um, several of the rural hospitals were able to expand access.

  65. 0:34:53

    Thank you.

  66. 0:34:55

    Questions for Miss Amy, anybody? Thank you, Miss McGuire, for your testimony. Thank you, everybody.

  67. 0:34:59

    Thank you so much.

  68. 0:35:00

    Thank you. Anybody from the audience that didn't have a sign-up sheet? Anybody got a- anything to add to this? Okay. Mr. Mont- Monty, you got anything to add to this? No, sir. Okay.

  69. 0:35:14

    What's the position of this?

  70. 0:35:15

    Do you know what the position would be, the j- hospital association's position is on this?

  71. 0:35:22

    We're not taking. Taking a position. All right. Miss Anna, I know you're in here somewhere. I saw you walk in. Any position on your side?

  72. 0:35:38

    Some of our friends are for it, some of our friends against it, right? I vote for my friends. I like that. All right. Any more, any more discussion from the panel, uh, from the members? I'll entertain a motion. Move to pass. Motion to pass. Senator Brass? Mr. Chairman, I'll second. Second, Senator Albers. Any discussion? All those in favor, please raise your right hand. Hello over there. Anybody opposed to this? Okay, we got two opposed, the rest for. Motion passed.

  73. 0:36:09

    Let me get this microphone for a second. This one's really-

  74. 0:36:12

    Go ahead.

  75. 0:36:13

    Before we adjourn, I just wanted to remind members our committee dinner is Monday, March the 9th. And, uh, please let, uh, Paige know if you're gonna come, and if anybody that hadn't signed up to sponsor yet, uh, if you would just reach out to her, and we look forward to seeing y'all then. We are meeting again, uh-

  76. 0:36:34

    How did that go?

  77. 0:36:34

    Yeah. We, we are meeting again in this committee on Monday at 12 o'clock. Uh, so members, please plan to be here. That, I believe, will be our last meeting of the year. We have one governor's bill coming through that the floor leader, Bo Hatchett's, asked to have a hearing on, so we'll be here Monday at, uh, noon. Right?

  78. 0:36:55

    Monday at noon.

  79. 0:36:56

    Yeah, Monday at noon.

  80. 0:36:57

    Adjourned.

  81. 0:36:58

    Thank you all for coming. Meeting adjourned.

Legible por máquinas https://georgiacommons.org/meetings/2026-02-26/senate-regulated-industries-and-utilities.md · https://georgiacommons.org/meetings/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp