Comité Public Safety and Homeland Security de la Cámara de Representantes
Comité Public Safety and Homeland Security de la Cámara de Representantes, 1 de abril de 2026
2025-2026 Regular Session · 506 CLOB · 21 min
Esta es una transcripción automática del video de la Asamblea General, hecha por un modelo de reconocimiento de voz. No es un registro oficial y puede entender mal palabras, nombres y números. No se identifica a quienes hablan. El video es el registro: cada marca de tiempo enlaza al momento en que se reproduce.
El video es de la Asamblea General y se reproduce desde su canal de Vimeo. Seleccione cualquier tiempo de abajo para reproducir ese momento. Ver en el canal de Vimeo de la Asamblea General · Agenda
Resumen
Escrito por un modelo de IA (gpt-6.1-sol) a partir de la transcripción. No forma parte del registro, y el video es lo que se dijo.
El comité examinó SB 454 y lo aprobó con enmiendas mediante una votación a viva voz, sin que se escuchara oposición. La presidencia explicó que los cambios harían que las cajas de seguridad para llaves en el exterior de las escuelas fueran opcionales en lugar de obligatorias y eliminarían una excepción que ya no sería necesaria. No hubo preguntas sustantivas ni más debate.
Proyectos de ley tratados (1)
Cada relato abarca el tramo de la reunión que indica. El número del proyecto de ley se dice en ese tramo, salvo cuando era el único proyecto en la agenda de un comité.
SB 454. Regulation of Fire and Other Hazards; use of temporary door locking devices in public buildings during certain emergency situations; authorize
Desde 0:18:31 · turnos 9 a 14
La presidencia dijo que SB 454 combinaba los proyectos de ley de dos legisladores y describió cambios a su disposición sobre las cajas de seguridad para llaves en las escuelas. La presidencia explicó que sustituir un requisito por una autorización permitiría, en lugar de exigir, que las escuelas primarias y secundarias instalaran al menos una caja de seguridad para llaves en el exterior. La presidencia también dijo que los cambios eliminaban una excepción para las escuelas cuyos órganos rectores hubieran implementado un proceso formal documentado, porque esa excepción resultaba innecesaria una vez que la instalación pasara a ser opcional. Un miembro del comité presentó una moción para aprobar el proyecto de ley con enmiendas, y otro miembro la secundó. No hubo preguntas sustantivas ni más discusión. La moción fue aprobada mediante una votación a viva voz, sin que se escuchara oposición.
Transcripción
16 turnos. Seleccione un tiempo para reproducir ese momento del video.
- 0:17:07
All right, everybody. We are, uh, we're going to go ahead and get started here in just a moment. Um-
- 0:17:14
Please view it on the
- 0:17:16
First of all, I'd like to thank all of y'all for being here, um, on a off day. And, uh, I'd like to start off by saying that, um, now that we're all here, we're not actually gonna have a meeting. So, thank y'all for coming.
- 0:17:30
That should be an April Fool's Day.
- 0:17:32
Thank you. Thank you for playing along, Mr. Skandalis.
- 0:17:38
My, uh, my wife and kids had one earlier this morning. They called me very first thing with one that, that I didn't think was funny at all, but-
- 0:17:47
They said you were good-looking?
- 0:17:50
Yeah, worse than that. They, yeah, they, uh, they played me pretty good, so I figured I had to do it back to somebody. Uh, Chairman Werkheiser is going to open us up in a word of prayer, and you are on, sir.
- 0:18:01
You mean make a motion and pray, or just pray? Our Father, we thank you for this opportunity. We thank you for giving us breath, and we thank you for all the things that you give us that we don't even recognize, and thank you for the opportunity to serve this state, and we just pray that we would do things in the best interest of the citizens of this state. And we just ask all these things in Jesus' name. Amen.
- 0:18:26
Thank you very much. All right. We are, uh, gonna be dealing with Senate Bill 454. Um, and Chairman Williams is here, and, uh, Representative Ridley is here, and they have the, the, essentially, t- their two bills were combined into this. What we're gonna be changing, if you'll look on page three- Um, in section two, what we've done is we've taken out some, um, language and changed on line 61, if you see where it says, um, "Elementary and secondary school in the state may provide for the installation at each school one l- one of at least, of at least one exterior lockbox." Um, that used to say shall.
- 0:19:16
The exemption language that was taken out, uh, in the old bill was from line 60 to 64, and it basically talked about unless a local board of education or other governing body had implemented a documented and a formal process, um, then they would have re- been required to do this. But now, since we're making it a may, it don't make sense to have that, uh, uh, exception language that was in there before. So that's been changed. That's all the changes in the bill. Um, and so do we have questions? Do you have a question?
- 0:19:46
No, I'd just like to make a motion that we, uh, adopt as amended. Second.
- 0:19:53
Okay. I have a motion and a second. Anybody got any questions, any discussion about any of this? Any comments from the authors? I think they're all aware and all good with the, the changes here, so all right. Seeing no further discussion, all in favor say aye.
- 0:20:09
Aye.
- 0:20:09
Any opposed, same sign. All right, thank y'all very much. And I would like to say this, this will for sure be the last meeting we have of this committee, God willing, uh, this session. So, uh, I wanna thank Michael, and I wanna thank Megan, and I wanna thank Ann for, uh, helping us. They've done a great job.
- 0:20:31
All right. Thank y'all all very much. I appreciate your, uh, your help during the session, and, uh, we'll see you next year. Thanks.