HB 513: Local government; criteria for service delivery strategy; revise provisions
Última acción: 14 de mayo de 2025 · Effective Date 2025-07-01
House Bill 513 lets local governments keep existing gas station video surveillance ordinances and changes how counties fund shared services with cities under Georgia's service delivery strategy law.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Enrolled, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Georgia law generally bars counties and cities from requiring gas stations to install video surveillance equipment. This bill carves out an exception: any local government that had already adopted such an ordinance before May 6, 2024 can keep enforcing it. The bill also rewrites part of the state's service delivery strategy law (O.C.G.A. § 36-70-24), which governs how counties and cities divide the cost of shared services. It clarifies that when a county and cities jointly fund a county-wide service, the county's share must come from unincorporated area residents, and it expands and reorganizes the list of taxes and fees counties can use for that funding, adding zoning fees and alcohol licensing fees. It also requires counties to give an annual report to other local governments detailing funds received and costs for these services, and it specifies that future legislative changes to this section do not automatically trigger a required review of existing strategies. The surveillance provision takes effect July 1, 2025; the service delivery changes take effect January 1, 2026.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Allows counties, municipalities, or consolidated governments that adopted gas station video surveillance ordinances before May 6, 2024 to keep enforcing them, despite the general ban on such mandates.
- Confirms that when a county and one or more cities jointly fund a county-wide service, the county's portion of that funding must come from unincorporated area residents.
- Expands the list of allowable funding sources for county services to include zoning fees, alcohol licensing fees, and solid waste franchise fees, while excluding amounts collected from incorporated areas.
- Requires counties to give each party to a service delivery strategy an annual report showing funds received and the cost of providing the relevant services.
- Specifies that a party does not have to keep separate accounts to comply with the new reporting requirement.
- States that a General Assembly amendment to the service delivery criteria law does not itself trigger a required review and revision of an already-approved strategy.
A quién afecta
Georgia counties, municipalities, and consolidated governments, especially those with existing gas station surveillance ordinances; unincorporated area residents and property owners who fund county services; and local governments that are parties to service delivery strategy agreements with their counties.
Por qué importa
Local governments that already required gas station cameras can keep those rules in place instead of repealing them. Counties gain clearer authority and more funding tools, plus a new reporting duty, when splitting the cost of shared services with cities, which affects how unincorporated residents are charged.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. § 36-60-32 to let local governments that adopted gas station video surveillance ordinances before May 6, 2024 continue enforcing them, effective July 1, 2025.
- Section 2 revises O.C.G.A. § 36-70-24 to state the county's share of jointly funded county-wide services must be borne by unincorporated area residents, individuals, and property owners.
- Section 2 adds zoning fees, alcohol licensing fees, and solid waste franchise fees to the list of funding sources counties may use, excluding amounts from incorporated areas.
- Section 2 requires counties to give an annual report to each strategy party listing funds received and the cost of covered services, without requiring separate accounts.
- Section 3 revises O.C.G.A. § 36-70-28 to state that a General Assembly amendment to the service delivery criteria section does not by itself require a strategy review.
- Section 4 sets the surveillance provision effective July 1, 2025, and the service delivery provisions effective January 1, 2026.
Del proyecto de ley
“a county, municipal corporation, or consolidated government which, prior to May 6, 2024, has adopted one or more ordinances related to the placement of video surveillance equipment at any business or location where the retail sale of automotive gasoline occurs is authorized to continue regulating the placement of said video surveillance equipment”
“the county share of such funding shall be borne by the unincorporated residents, individuals, and property owners that receive the service”
“No amendment to Code Section 36-70-24 made by the General Assembly shall constitute an event necessitating review and revision to an approved strategy”
Cronología del estado
- Effective Date 2025-07-01
- Act 270
- House Date Signed by Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Sent to Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
Mostrar el historial completo (16 acciones)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- House Passed/Adopted (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Third Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Hopper (Cámara de Representantes)
Patrocinadores
- John LaHood (R, HD-175)
- Victor Anderson (R, HD-010)
- James Burchett (R, HD-176)
- John Corbett (R, HD-174)
- Brian Prince (D, HD-132)
- Max Burns (R, SD-023)
Votaciones
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes6 de marzo de 2025
169 a favor, 1 en contra (3 sin votar, 7 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado2 de abril de 2025
50 a favor, 2 en contra (2 sin votar, 2 ausentes)
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes4 de abril de 2025
163 a favor, 2 en contra (6 sin votar, 9 ausentes)
Temas
- local government funding
- gas station surveillance
- service delivery strategy
- county and city cost sharing
- property taxes and fees