SB 29: DNA Sampling, Collection, and Analysis; collection of DNA samples of individuals arrested for the commission of a felony at the time such individuals are booked or otherwise processed by a detention facility; provide
Última acción: 27 de marzo de 2026 · House Withdrawn, Recommitted
Georgia lawmakers are considering a bill, the 'Ashley Spence Act,' that would require police to collect DNA samples from people arrested for serious violent felonies, not just those convicted, at the time of booking.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Comm Sub, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Under current Georgia law, DNA samples are generally collected from people after they are convicted of a felony, not simply arrested. This bill would change that for a specific category of crimes: it directs that anyone arrested for a 'serious violent felony' (as defined in O.C.G.A. § 17-10-6.1, which covers crimes like murder, rape, and armed robbery) must have a DNA sample collected by the arresting officer or at the detention facility when they are booked. If someone is arrested without a warrant, the sample cannot be taken until a judge or grand jury finds probable cause. The bill also updates rules for destroying DNA records when charges are dismissed, reduced, or a conviction is reversed, spelling out more situations that trigger expungement. It requires the state to pay for DNA testing costs and to supply prepaid DNA collection kits to law enforcement agencies. The changes would only take effect on July 1, 2028, and only if the General Assembly specifically appropriates funding for the program.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Requires DNA samples to be collected from anyone arrested for a serious violent felony, not just those convicted, at the time of booking or processing.
- Requires the state, rather than local detention facilities alone, to cover the cost of DNA testing and to furnish postage-prepaid DNA collection kits to law enforcement.
- Expands the list of documents (such as prosecutor statements or expired statute-of-limitations proof) that can trigger removal of a person's DNA profile from the state database.
- Blocks DNA collection from someone if the state already has an un-destroyed DNA sample from that person on file.
- Requires that DNA from a warrantless arrest not be collected until a judge or grand jury makes a probable cause finding.
- Makes the entire Act contingent on the state specifically funding it, with a target effective date of July 1, 2028.
A quién afecta
People arrested for serious violent felonies in Georgia, law enforcement officers and detention facility staff who must collect and process DNA samples, the GBI's Division of Forensic Sciences, court clerks and prosecutors who handle expungement paperwork, and the state budget, which must fund the program before it takes effect.
Por qué importa
If funded, Georgia would begin collecting DNA from people merely arrested for serious violent crimes, before any conviction, expanding the state's DNA database earlier in the criminal process. The bill also gives people whose charges are dropped or reduced more documented paths to get their DNA profile removed.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 names the bill the 'Ashley Spence Act.'
- Section 2 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 35-3-160 to add arrest for a 'serious violent felony' (defined by cross-reference to O.C.G.A. § 17-10-6.1) as a new trigger for mandatory DNA collection, and requires the state to pay all testing costs and supply prepaid collection kits.
- Section 3 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 35-3-161 so DNA is collected by the arresting officer or at booking rather than within 30 days of incarceration, and requires a probable cause finding before taking DNA from a warrantless arrest.
- Section 4 rewrites O.C.G.A. § 35-3-165 to broaden the grounds and paperwork for expunging a person's DNA profile, including dismissed charges, expired statutes of limitations, or reduced sentences.
- Section 5 makes the Act effective July 1, 2028, only if the General Assembly appropriates specific funding for it.
- Section 6 repeals conflicting laws.
Del proyecto de ley
“Who has been arrested for the commission of a serious violent felony in this state.”
“However, if the person is arrested without a warrant, then the DNA sample shall not be taken until a probable cause determination has been made by a judge or grand jury.”
“This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2028, only if funds are specifically appropriated for the purposes of this Act”
Cronología del estado
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Withdrawn, Recommitted (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted As Amended (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
Mostrar el historial completo (12 acciones)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- Senate Hopper (Senado)
Patrocinadores
- Ricky Williams (R, SD-025)
- John Albers (R, SD-056)
- Randy Robertson (R, SD-029)
- Mike Hodges (R, SD-003)
- Timothy Bearden (R, SD-030)
- Billy Hickman (R, SD-004)
- Kay Kirkpatrick (R, SD-032)
- Matt Brass (R, SD-006)
- Chuck Payne (R, SD-054)
- Max Burns (R, SD-023)
- Marty Harbin (R, SD-016)
- Frank Ginn (R, SD-047)
- Bo Hatchett (R, SD-050)
- Shawn Still (R, SD-048)
- Clint Dixon (R, SD-045)
- Clint Crowe (R, HD-118)
Votaciones
- Votación: Senado3 de marzo de 2025
44 a favor, 11 en contra (0 sin votar, 1 ausentes)
Temas
- DNA collection
- criminal justice
- law enforcement procedures
- violent crime arrests
- state funding