SB 57: "Freedom of Speech and Belief Act"; enact
Última acción: 6 de marzo de 2025 · Senate Lost
A Georgia Senate bill would bar large banks, payment processors, and utility companies from cutting off service to customers based on a 'social credit score' tied to their political speech, gun ownership, or religious beliefs.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Comm Sub, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
This bill, called the Freedom of Speech and Belief Act, adds a new part to Georgia's consumer protection law (O.C.G.A. Title 10, Chapter 1, Article 15). It targets large financial institutions (banks or credit unions with over $1 billion in assets, or payment processors handling over $1 billion in transactions) and utility providers (electric, water and sewer, natural gas, and broadband). These 'essential services providers' would be barred from cutting off or restricting service to an existing customer based on that customer's exercise of rights protected by the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, such as speech, religion, association, or gun ownership, or based on a 'social credit score' built from those factors or from things like refusing to disclose greenhouse gas emissions or refusing to adopt diversity quotas. The bill makes violations an unfair or deceptive trade practice under Georgia's Fair Business Practices Act. It also creates a private lawsuit option letting a harmed customer sue for actual damages or $50,000, whichever is more, with triple damages or $150,000 possible for willful violations, plus injunctions and attorney's fees.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Prohibits large banks, credit unions, payment processors, and utility companies from cutting off service to existing customers based on their exercise of constitutional rights like speech, religion, or gun ownership.
- Defines a 'social credit score' to include factors such as refusing to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, refusing diversity or gender quotas, or declining to help employees get abortions or gender reassignment care, and bars service denial based on such scores.
- Bars covered companies from coordinating with each other, directly or through intermediaries, to jointly deny someone essential services for these reasons.
- Makes violations an unfair or deceptive trade practice enforceable under Georgia's Fair Business Practices Act of 1975.
- Creates a private right of action letting harmed customers sue for the greater of actual damages or $50,000, with triple damages or $150,000 for willful violations, plus injunctive relief and attorney's fees.
- Carves out an exception letting financial institutions use pre-disclosed, impartial financial risk standards to evaluate customers in industries like firearms, ammunition, oil, or natural gas without it counting as prohibited discrimination.
A quién afecta
Large banks and credit unions with more than $1 billion in assets, large payment processors and card networks handling over $1 billion in transactions, and utility providers offering electric, water and sewer, natural gas, or broadband service. It also affects any Georgia customer with an existing account or agreement with those companies, particularly those whose political, religious, or firearm-related activities might otherwise trigger service restrictions.
Por qué importa
If enacted, Georgians who use major banks, payment processors, or utility companies could not have their accounts or service cut off because of their political speech, religious practice, gun ownership, or refusal to meet corporate diversity or climate disclosure standards, and could sue for significant damages if that happened.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 titles the bill the 'Freedom of Speech and Belief Act.'
- Section 2 lays out legislative findings that freedom of association should not let essential service providers deprive citizens of financial or utility services based on their exercise of constitutional rights.
- Section 3 adds new Code Section 10-1-439.20 defining 'discriminate in the provision of essential services,' 'essential services,' 'financial institution' (banks/credit unions over $1 billion in assets or payment processors over $1 billion in transactions), and 'social credit score.'
- New Code Section 10-1-439.21 prohibits essential services providers from discriminating against customers with an established business relationship or coordinating with others to do so.
- New Code Section 10-1-439.22 makes violations subject to the Fair Business Practices Act and creates a private lawsuit allowing recovery of actual damages or $50,000 (whichever is greater), up to triple damages or $150,000 for willful violations, plus injunctive relief and attorney's fees.
- The financial-risk exception in subparagraph (E) lets banks use pre-disclosed, impartial risk standards for industries like firearms or oil and gas without that counting as a prohibited social credit score.
- Section 4 repeals all conflicting laws.
Del proyecto de ley
“An essential services provider shall not: (1) Discriminate in the provision of essential services against a person that has an established business relationship with such essential services provider”
“'Social credit score' means a score or rating determined by an analysis or evaluation of one or more the following: (A) A person's exercise of any constitutional right protected by the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution”
“Recover, for each violation, actual damages caused by such violation or $50,000.00, whichever is greater”
Cronología del estado
- Senate Lost (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- Senate Hopper (Senado)
Patrocinadores
- Blake Tillery (R, SD-019)
- Greg Dolezal (R, SD-027)
- Brian Strickland (R, SD-042)
- Frank Ginn (R, SD-047)
- Max Burns (R, SD-023)
- Billy Hickman (R, SD-004)
- Ricky Williams (R, SD-025)
- Marty Harbin (R, SD-016)
- Jason Anavitarte (R, SD-031)
- Russ Goodman (R, SD-008)
- Bo Hatchett (R, SD-050)
- Steve Gooch (R, SD-051)
- Chuck Hufstetler (R, SD-052)
Votaciones
- Votación: Senado6 de marzo de 2025
32 a favor, 22 en contra (2 sin votar, 0 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado6 de marzo de 2025
49 a favor, 7 en contra
- Votación: Senado6 de marzo de 2025
33 a favor, 22 en contra (1 sin votar, 0 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado6 de marzo de 2025
13 a favor, 43 en contra
Temas
- banking regulation
- utility services
- free speech
- gun rights
- consumer protection law