Comité Children and Families del Senado
Comité Children and Families del Senado, 3 de febrero de 2026
2025-2026 Regular Session · 450 CAP · 37 min
Esta es una transcripción automática del video de la Asamblea General, hecha por un modelo de reconocimiento de voz. No es un registro oficial y puede entender mal palabras, nombres y números. No se identifica a quienes hablan. El video es el registro: cada marca de tiempo enlaza al momento en que se reproduce.
El video es de la Asamblea General y se reproduce desde su canal de Vimeo. Seleccione cualquier tiempo de abajo para reproducir ese momento. Ver en el canal de Vimeo de la Asamblea General · Agenda
Resumen
Escrito por un modelo de IA (gpt-6.1-sol) a partir de la transcripción. No forma parte del registro, y el video es lo que se dijo.
El comité recomendó por unanimidad la aprobación de SB 431, que, según su promotor, exigiría que las escuelas inscriban a los estudiantes en cuidado de crianza temporal en un plazo de dos días escolares, y de SR 622, que crearía un comité de estudio conjunto de la Cámara de Representantes de Georgia y el Senado de Georgia sobre el aumento de los costos del cuidado de crianza temporal. La discusión sobre la inscripción se centró en equilibrar el acceso rápido a la escuela con las preocupaciones sobre la falta de expedientes estudiantiles y la seguridad. Georgia Appleseed apoyó la propuesta de inscripción. Dos personas que testificaron en representación de Georgia Empowerment apoyaron el comité de estudio y pidieron una participación significativa de personas con experiencia en el cuidado de crianza temporal. El promotor aceptó trabajar con la Cámara para incluir esas voces en el proceso.
Proyectos de ley tratados (2)
Cada relato abarca el tramo de la reunión que indica. El número del proyecto de ley se dice en ese tramo, salvo cuando era el único proyecto en la agenda de un comité.
SB 431. Education; enrollment of foster care students within two school days of a request for enrollment by such student's parent or legal custodian; require
Desde 0:19:08 · turnos 6 a 73
El promotor dijo que SB 431 exigiría que las escuelas receptoras inscriban a los estudiantes en cuidado de crianza temporal en un plazo de dos días escolares, proporcionen a los padres o custodios legales información específica de contacto de la escuela y permitan que el Department of Education exija medidas correctivas. El promotor dijo que los testimonios ante el comité de estudio describieron demoras en la inscripción después de cambios de colocación, pérdida de créditos y un estudiante que tuvo que repetir un grado. Un miembro del comité preguntó si inscribir a los estudiantes antes de que lleguen sus expedientes podría generar riesgos de seguridad y si los expedientes podrían transferirse más rápido. El promotor dijo que las restricciones de privacidad complican las transferencias, reconoció que no tenía una solución completa a la preocupación sobre la seguridad y dijo que se estaban considerando por separado cambios más amplios en la transferencia de expedientes. El promotor destacó el daño que causa a los estudiantes en cuidado de crianza temporal perder días de escuela. El comité votó por unanimidad a favor de recomendar la aprobación. En un testimonio posterior, una persona de Georgia Appleseed apoyó el proyecto de ley y dijo que el estudio de la organización encontró que más de 35 condados negaban la inscripción a niños, en parte debido a nuevos requisitos de expedientes establecidos por HB 268.
SR 622. Joint Study Committee on Evaluating Escalating Costs in Georgia's Foster Care System; create
Desde 0:26:01 · turnos 48 a 78
El promotor dijo que SR 622 crearía un comité de estudio conjunto de la Cámara de Representantes de Georgia y el Senado de Georgia para examinar el aumento de los costos del cuidado de crianza temporal tras un déficit presupuestario del Department of Human Services que afectó programas y servicios. El promotor identificó posibles factores que impulsan los costos, entre ellos la atención a niños con necesidades complejas, las demoras en la aprobación de la atención por parte de la organización de atención administrada responsable y la atención ordenada por los tribunales. El promotor dijo que estos problemas surgieron después de que el comité de estudio anterior terminó sus reuniones y que necesitaban un examen más profundo. Una persona que testificó en representación de Georgia Empowerment apoyó la propuesta y pidió que se involucrara desde el principio a jóvenes y otras personas con experiencia en el cuidado de crianza temporal, posiblemente como miembros del comité. Una segunda persona que testificó, dedicada a la defensa de derechos y con casi 17 años de experiencia vinculada al sistema de cuidado de crianza temporal de Georgia, dijo que esa participación podría ayudar a identificar gastos ineficaces, oportunidades de apoyo más temprano y brechas entre las políticas y la práctica. El promotor dijo que el texto de la resolución debe coincidir con la versión de la Cámara y aceptó trabajar con la Cámara para incluir en el proceso a personas con experiencia vivida. No se presentó ninguna enmienda y el comité votó por unanimidad a favor de recomendar la aprobación.
Transcripción
84 turnos. Seleccione un tiempo para reproducir ese momento del video.
- 0:17:48
The Children and Families Committee. It's been a little crazy around here today, so apologize if anybody got here an hour early for the committee meeting. We were, uh, voting up until just recently. So, um, with that, I'm gonna ask Senator Hatchett to open us in prayer.
- 0:18:07
All right. Thank you. Uh, let us pray. Dear Heavenly Father, thank you for today. Uh, thank you for, uh, allowing us all to arrive here safely. Thank you for our families back home. Please watch over, protect us, and, uh, help us deliberate today, and get us home safely to our families this afternoon. In Jesus name we pray, amen.
- 0:18:30
Amen.
- 0:18:30
Thank you. We have two bills today, and since I'm the sponsoring senator for both of 'em, I'm gonna ask my vice chair, Senator Hatchett, to scoot over here and, uh, run the meeting.
- 0:18:59
Thank you, Madam Chair, and I will let you decide which one you wanna do first.
- 0:19:04
Okay.
- 0:19:07
Let's do Senate Bill 431-
- 0:19:10
All right
- 0:19:10
... first. This bill, which, uh, is LC492569, is a result of the study committee that met over the summer, and the information from people who testified that foster kids who change placements and schools are not always being immediately enrolled. In some cases, this has resulted in losing credits that did not transfer, and in one case that we heard about, a student had to repeat a grade.
- 0:19:44
We've got, uh, we've identified a number of school districts that are not immediately enrolling the kids. The Department of Education testified, and they told us they really don't have the authority to tell the local districts that they have to do immediate enrollment. We passed Senate Bill 268 on school safety, which required record transfer, and some schools are delaying due to waiting for records that are protected by HIPAA and other federal laws.
- 0:20:18
So this bill specifically addresses foster students, and it requires the school, the receiving school to enroll within two school days. It requires the school districts to provide the parent or legal custodian with accurate contact information, including the school's RESA student affairs officer and the chief privacy officer. The Department of Education can then require the receiving school to comply with a corrective action plan.
- 0:20:51
And that is all the bill does, and I'm happy to take any questions. I don't know if anybody's signed up to testify.
- 0:20:57
I don't think we have anybody signed up. Does anybody have any questions for the chairwoman?
- 0:21:00
Do we have a sign-up sheet?
- 0:21:02
Mm-hmm.
- 0:21:02
Yeah, okay.
- 0:21:03
Uh, what number are you? Nine?
- 0:21:05
Nine.
- 0:21:05
All right.
- 0:21:08
Thank you. Um, I didn't follow the work of the study committee, so I ask this question, uh, as a sincere just kind of trying to update myself. Um, the school safety bill, 26- what was it? 26-
- 0:21:22
268
- 0:21:23
... 68. Um, I believe that one of the issues that that
- 0:21:31
bill tried to deal with was, um, the issue that in some of the, um, gun in schools incidents, not just here, but nationally, um, children with behavioral issues were being moved from schools to school, and sometimes the new school didn't know that the child had a history of severe behavioral issues. Um, so I believe that the, um, waiting till the records get there was an effort to correct that.
- 0:22:10
I have heard since then that one of the unintended consequences is that children are stuck being out of school because the records aren't there, which is not good either. Um, m- my concern is that foster children, um, may have, you know, they may be at higher risk of behavioral problems, and is there a counter concern that if the records aren't there, um, that ch- other children could be endangered?
- 0:22:47
Is there a- also a way that we can speed up the records? That seems to me that that would be the answer, is to, um, speed up getting those records.
- 0:22:57
Well, again, uh, I think the local school districts have the, um, sort of the a- authority in these situations, but these kids are in state custody, and so it's a little bit different than the, the rest of the kids, if you know what I mean.
- 0:23:14
I do.
- 0:23:15
So, um, the, the problem with 268 was there was a may instead of a shall in involving the record transfer. And so, uh, there's been some discussion of just changing that for all the kids, and I think there's some work going on in that area, but I really wanted to focus on the foster kids in this bill, and that's why I didn't make it broader.
- 0:23:37
Well, is there anything that the foster care system can do to make sure that the schools know- You know, the situation the, the child is in, knows something about the child they're receiving, so that if precaution needs to be taken for behavioral issues, they can be taken-
- 0:24:02
There might be-
- 0:24:03
... even without the records
- 0:24:04
... there might be, except that, again, a lot of the information that is being requested to be transferred can't be released. And so, uh, it's a tricky-
- 0:24:16
Yeah
- 0:24:16
... sort of balance there, you know, b- between protecting the student's rights and protecting the other kids in the school. So-
- 0:24:25
I'm sure-
- 0:24:25
I don't, I don't totally know the answer how to fix that.
- 0:24:29
Yeah. I'm, I'm sure-
- 0:24:29
But I do know that there's some changes to 268 that are being entertained.
- 0:24:33
Okay. So I'm sure since you did a whole study committee on it, that you kind of weighed the pros and cons and, and you came to the conclusion that it was better to get more kids into school s- swiftly, um, than the risk of a bad situation happening because the school doesn't understand the behavioral complexities of a student entering their school. You weighed those.
- 0:25:02
Yeah, I think the foster kids are already facing challenges-
- 0:25:06
Mm-hmm
- 0:25:06
... that are beyond what the rest of the school population is facing. And a day out of school is, um, has big impacts-
- 0:25:17
It does
- 0:25:17
... on the kids. So that's why we're just trying to address this narrow population. And again, it's not a huge number of kids in the school population, but it's, um, definitely impacting some of the people that we heard from at the study committee.
- 0:25:31
Okay. Thank you.
- 0:25:33
Any other questions? Hearing none, uh, we'll entertain a motion. Move do pass. Move do pass by Senator Burns. Is there a second?
- 0:25:44
Second.
- 0:25:45
Second by Senator Parkes. All those in favor, raise your hand. And opposed? It's unanimous.
- 0:25:55
Okay. Thank you. And, um, I guess I'll go ahead and talk about the other bill now, Senate Resolution 622, Joint Study Committee. And what this bill has to do with, this also has come up recently, and this was not discussed in our study committee because this kind of came up after the study committee had finished our meetings. And it has to do with the issues at DHS recently, specifically a budget deficit that has gotten a lot of attention and has affected programs and services for foster care.
- 0:26:32
This is a multifactorial problem that we feel needs further discussion. Some of the factors that have been raised include increasing costs for complex needs kids in state custody, delays in approval for Medicare by the CMO provider that is accountable for the foster kids' care, resulting in the department paying those bills so that the kids get the care, and increasing court order directives for care, and many other things that were brought up.
- 0:27:06
So the lieutenant governor's office, the governor's office, and the department have been in discussions with the General Assembly ever since this information came out. And, um, so w- what I'm asking is that we approve this joint study committee to come up with solutions and to do a deeper dive for this complex issue of increasing costs for out-of-home care. This has to exactly match the House language. They've dropped the same bill on the other hand. Um, Representative Beth Kemp, who's now the Chairman of Juvenile Justice, and I are working on this.
- 0:27:41
And the Senate, as you know, has had three study committees in a row for addressing problems faced by kids in the foster system, and we've done a lot of legislation, also appropriations in this area, but the issues are complex, and we need to continue the work, particularly when it comes to dealing with the complex needs kids. So with that, I'm happy to take any questions.
- 0:28:06
Any questions from members of the committee? All right, we have... Oh, you have a question? No, no, no, no. Okay. Uh, we have three people signed up, um, to speak. It looks like all are in favor, and I think this bill's going the right way, so if we could keep it to our... Brevity will be your friend, I'll put it that way. Uh, so Devin Rudy-Johnson.
- 0:28:34
If you could just introduce yourself and tell us who you're with.
- 0:28:37
Good thing, uh-
- 0:28:38
Hang on one second. There we go.
- 0:28:40
We good now?
- 0:28:41
We're good.
- 0:28:42
All right. Hello. Thank you all for l- allowing us to speak. My name is Devin Rudy-Johnson. I work with Georgia Empowerment. Um, we believe that when there are decisions being made about young people in foster care, that lived experience voice should be involved. Um, and we are very grateful to Senator Kirkpatrick for involving us so far. Um, and we just, we are in favor. We're really excited about both of these bills. Um, and we believe that it's best practice to involve young people or people with lived experience in these things from the very beginning and throughout, um, to avoid tokenization and parentification and just collecting stories.
- 0:29:23
They should be there to help drive the change. Um, and Senator Kirkpatrick did let us know that, uh, there's plans to involve their testimony, um, going forward. But I'd love if my colleague with lived experience, Reginald Holloway, could speak to what it would mean to be involved throughout, from the beginning to the end of the study committee, and maybe even being a committee member.
- 0:29:51
Good afternoon.
- 0:29:52
Good afternoon.
- 0:29:55
Thank you for the opportunity to speak and participate in today's hearing. My name is Reginald Holloway, and I'm here as a advocate alongside Georgia Empowerment, but I'm also someone with nearly 17 years of lived experience connected to Georgia's foster care system. I believe that consideration for SR 622 is an important step f- toward the future of youth in care. Establishing a study committee to examine rising foster care costs acknowledges that the system is under strain.
- 0:30:27
But I want to offer this perspective. Costs does not rise in ins- in isolation. They rise in response to children in crisis, families seeking stability, and systems making decisions without always hearing from those most impacted. Having a front row view into the realities of budget deficits and the effects of funding cuts, I can say clearly that voices with lived experience are not optional, they are necessary.
- 0:30:58
At Georgia Empowerment, we live by a simple but powerful principle, nothing about us without us. That phrase does not mean opposition. It means partnership. It means policies are stronger, smarter, and more effective when people who are most affected are a part of the conversation from the beginning, not after decisions have already been made. When we talk about deficits, we often speak in numbers, but behind every number is a real life impacted.
- 0:31:30
A placement that didn't last, a service that came too late, or a young person who aged out without the support they needed earlier. These realities are not always visible in data, but they are deeply understood through lived experience. This is why it is essential that lived experience experts be included on the SR 622 Study Committee, not as symbolic representation, but as subject matter experts whose insights come from navigating the system in real time.
- 0:32:04
Lived experience helps identify where dollars are being spent without impact, where early investments could prevent higher costs later, and where policy intentions may not align with real world outcomes. Without lived experience, a study risk, a study committee risk examining this system from the outside in. With it, this committee has the opportunity to understand the system from the inside out, leading to recommendations that are more practical, more humane, and more sustainable.
- 0:32:38
If Georgia is serious about understanding the true cost of foster care, then we must also be intentional about listening to the people who live those costs every day. In that spirit, I respectfully ask the committee members to consider including lived experience experts on the SR 622 Study Committee. Thank you for your time and consideration.
- 0:33:02
Thank you very much for your testimony. Are there any questions from the committee for the presenter? No? No. All right, thank you very much.
- 0:33:09
Thank you.
- 0:33:10
Uh, next we have Darlene Lynch.
- 0:33:18
Well, I had actually signed up to support the bill you already voted out of committee. But I-
- 0:33:24
We heard you loud and clear.
- 0:33:26
I'll just say real quick, though, two sentences. I'm Darlene Lynch, legal and policy director from Georgia Appleseed. Uh, we have been a nonprofit working for 20 years with and in schools to improve the school environment, make sure kids get enrolled. We did our own study and saw 35-plus counties were denying enrollment for children, in part because of the new record requirements under HB 268, and we fully support, uh, Senator Kirkpatrick's bill. Thank you.
- 0:33:56
Thank you. All right, that's all the testimony that we have today. Um, would the author like to close? Are you good? All right.
- 0:34:05
No, I just will make the point that because this is a joint study committee, the language has to exactly match between the Senate and the House. So I'm happy to work with the House to be sure that people with lived experience are included in the process.
- 0:34:19
Perfect. All right. I will entertain a motion.
- 0:34:22
Motion to, mo- mo- motion do pass.
- 0:34:24
Motion do pass. Is there a second? We got a second. All those in favor, raise your hand. Opposed? It's unanimous.
- 0:34:32
Thank you so much.
- 0:34:33
Do you wanna close the meeting?
- 0:34:34
You can close the meeting.
- 0:34:34
All right. Meeting is adjourned. See you out there.
- 0:34:40
Well-